Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:30:49.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalizing Evolutionary Altruism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Anthony Peressini
Anthony Peressini*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin-Madison
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, 600 North Park Street, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although accounts of evolutionary altruism which leave the question of whether altruism can evolve in nature open to empirical confirmation/refutation have been worked out for special (two-trait) cases, no real effort has been made to work out such accounts for general (N-trait) cases. It is tempting to take this lack of attention as evidence for an inextricably conventional element, which precludes such accounts from being of practical scientific value. I argue that such accounts do generalize in a natural way. As is often the case in science, generalizing theoretically simplified notions is not straightforward because of issues hidden in the special case. These issues do not, however, turn out to be essentially conventional.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 1993, pp. 568 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Elliott Sober for advice and comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barash, D. (1979), The Whisperings Within. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982), The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. ([1976] 1989), The Selfish Gene. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eells, E. (1991), Probabilistic Causality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964), “The Genetical Theory of Social Behavior: I and II”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–52.10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene, H.; Pavlovsky, O.; and Dobzhansky, T. (1954), “Interaction of the Adaptive Values in Polymorphic Experimental Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura”, Drosophila Pseudoobscura 8: 335–349.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. (1970), “The Units of Selection”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–14.10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1989), Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1988), “What is Evolutionary Altruism?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy (supplementary) 14: 75–99.10.1080/00455091.1988.10715945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1992), “The Evolution of Altruism: Correlation, Cost, and Benefit”, Biology and Philosophy 7: 177–187.10.1007/BF00129882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. (1971), “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism”, Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57.10.1086/406755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1975), “A Theory of Group Selection”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 72: 143–146.10.1073/pnas.72.1.143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D. S. (1980), The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1983), “The Group Selection Controversy: History and Current Status”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 159–187.10.1146/annurev.es.14.110183.001111CrossRefGoogle Scholar