Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T12:16:32.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Measuring Rods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

John C. Graves and
James E. Roper
John C. Graves
Affiliation:
Princeton University
James E. Roper
Affiliation:
Princeton UniversityNow at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Now at Michigan State University.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we show that a restricted form of time travel both accords with special relativity kinematics and avoids several prima facie objections. We argue that such time travel provides a reasonable way to interpret certain phenomena which can readily be described, and the analogues of which have already been observed at the level of elementary particle reactions. We then describe how a time-traveling object could measure itself, and demonstrate how, in the appropriate circumstances, such an experiment could convince a theorist who insisted on a single criterion for length measurements that his standard had itself changed in length. The same experiment can shed light on the possibility of detecting a universal expansion; and we show that, given certain experimental results, one must conclude that every member of a class of time travelers has changed in length simultaneously, though perhaps only while going backwards in time.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 1965, pp. 39 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Feynman, R., “The Theory of Positrons,” Physical Review, vol. 76 (1949), pp. 749–759.10.1103/PhysRev.76.749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Grünbaum, A., “Geometry, Chronometry, and Empiricism,” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G.), vol. III, Minneapolis, 1962, pp. 405–526.Google Scholar
[3] Grünbaum, A., Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
[4] Grünbaum, A., “Is a Universal Nocturnal Doubling Falsifiable or Physically Vacuous?” Philosophical Studies, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Helmholtz, H., “The Origin and Meaning of the Geometrical Axioms,” Mind, vol. I (1876), pp. 301–321.Google Scholar
[6] Hempel, C. G., “Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation,” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G.) vol. III, Minneapolis, 1962, pp. 98–169.Google Scholar
[7] Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, 1962.Google Scholar
[8] Leighton, R., Principles of Modern Physics, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[9] Massey, G. J., The Philosophy of Space, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, 1963.Google Scholar
[10] Poincaré, H., The Foundations of Science, Lancaster, 1946.Google Scholar
[11] Putnam, H., “It Ain't Necessarily So,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 59 (1962), pp. 658–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Reichenbach, H., The Philosophy of Space and Time, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
[13] Reichenbach, H., The Direction of Time, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Schlegel, H., Time and the Physical World, East Lansing, 1961.Google Scholar
[15] Smart, J. J. C., “Is Time Travel Possible?” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 60 (1963), pp. 237–241.10.2307/2023644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Wheeler, J. and Feynman, R., “Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 17 (1945), pp. 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Wheeler, J. and Feynman, R., “Classical Electrodynamics in terms of Direct Interparticle Action,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 21 (1949), pp. 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Wiener, N., Cybernetics, New York, 1948.10.1038/scientificamerican1148-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar