Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:48:03.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Objectivity in Experimental Inquiry: Breaking Data-Technique Circles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Sylvia Culp
Sylvia Culp*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I respond to H. M. Collins's claim (1985, 1990, 1993) that experimental inquiry cannot be objective because the only criterium experimentalists have for determining whether a technique is “working” is the production of “correct” (i.e., the expected) data. Collins claims that the “experimenters' regress,” the name he gives to this data-technique circle, cannot be broken using the resources of experiment alone. I argue that the data-technique circle, can be broken even though any interpretation of the raw data produced by techniques is theory-dependent. However, it is possible to break this circle by eliminating dependence on even those theoretical presuppositions that are shared by an entire scientific community through the use of multiple independently theory-dependent techniques to produce robust bodies of data. Moreover, I argue, that it is the production of robust bodies of data that convinces experimentalists of the objectivity of their data interpretations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , September 1995, pp. 438 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008

‡

I would like to thank Philip Kitcher, Gerald Doppelt, Arthur Falk, Quentin Smith, and an anonymous referee for their insightful criticism and helpful suggestions. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the University of California, San Diego, University of Illinios, Urbana-Champaign, University of California, Irvine, Rice University and Western Michigan University. This work was supported by a New Faculty Research Support Program Grant and by funds from the Faculty Research and Creative Activities Support Fund, Western Michigan University.

References

Ackermann, R. J. (1985), Data, Instruments, and Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambler, R. P. and Scott, G. K. (1978), “Partial Amino Acid Sequence of Penicillinase Coded by Escherichia coli Plasmid R6K”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 75: 3732–3736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, H. M. (1985), Changing Order. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. (1990), Artificial Experts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. and Pinch, T. (1993), The Golem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costerton, J. W. (1979), “The Role of Electron Microscopy in the Elucidation of Bacterial Structure and Function”, Annual Review of Microbiology 33: 459–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culp, S. C. (1994), “Defending Robustness: the Bacterial Mesosome as a Test Case”, in Hull, D., Forbes, M. and Burian, R. M. (eds), PSA-1994, 1. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 46–57.Google Scholar
Daston, L. and Galison, P. (1992), “The Image of Objectivity”, Representations 40: 81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975), Against Method. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. (1986), The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A. (1990), Experiment Right or Wrong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, W. and Maxam, A. (1973), “The Nucleotide Sequence of the lac Operator”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 70: 3581–3584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jardine, N. (1986), The Fortunes of Inquiry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, N. (1991), The Scenes of Inquiry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1958), Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kosso, P. (1989), Observability and Observation in Physical Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Light, A. (1974), Proteins: Structure and Function. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Longino, H. (1990), Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxam, A. and Gilbert, W. (1977), “A New Method for Sequencing DNA”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 74: 560–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Old, R.; Murray, K.; and Roizes, G. (1975), “Recognition Sequence of Restriction Endonuclease III from Hemophilus influenzae”, Journal of Molecular Biology 92: 331–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrin, J. ([1913] 1923), Atoms. Translated by Hammick, D.L. Originally published as Les Atomes (Paris: Alcan). New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, N. (1993), “Facts, Artifacts, and Mesosomes: Practicing Epistemology with the Electron Microscope”, Studies in the. History of the Philosophy of Science. 24: 227–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956), The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sanger, F.; Nicklen, S.; and Coulson, A. R. (1977), “DNA Sequencing with Chain-terminating Inhibitors”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 74: 5463–5467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanger, F; Air, G. M.; Barrell, B. G.; Brown, N. L.; Coulson, A. R.; Fiddes, J. C.; Hutchison III, C. A.; Slocombe, P. M.; and Smith, M. (1977), “Nucleotide Sequence of Bacteriophage ⊘X174 DNA”, Nature 265: 687–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salton, M. R. J. and Owen, P. (1976), “Bacterial Membrane Structure”, Annual Review of Microbiology 30: 451–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutcliffe, J. G. (1978a), “Nucleotide Sequence of pBR322”, Diss. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, J. G. (1978b), “Nucleotide Sequence of the Ampicillin Resistance Gene of Escherichia coli Plasmid pBR322”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 75: 3737–3741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. D. (1968), The Double Helix. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W.C. (1974), “Complexity and Organization”, in Schaffner, K.F. and Cohen, R.S. (eds.), PSA-1972 (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 20). Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W.C. (1981), “Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination”, in Brewer, M. B. and Collins, B. E. (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 124–163.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W.C. (1991), “Taming the Dimensions Visualizations in Science”, in Forbes, M., Wessels, L., and Fine, A. (eds.), PSA-1990, 2. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 111–135.Google Scholar