An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
Footnotes
†
Send reprint requests to the author.
‡
I would like to thank Philip Kitcher for his editorial help.
References
Franklin, Allan, and Howson, Colin (1998), “Comment on ‘The Structure of a Scientific Paper’ by Frederick Suppe”, Philosophy of Science65: 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert (1965), “The Inference to the Best Explanation”, Philosophical Review74: 88–95.10.2307/2183532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter (1993), “Is the Best Good Enough?”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society93: 89–104.10.1093/aristotelian/93.1.89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter (1998), “The Best Explanation of a Scientific Paper”, Philosophy of Science65: 406–410.10.1086/392652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W. J. (1968), “Rises, Trenches, Great Faults, and Crustal Blocks”, Journal of Geophysical Research 73/6(March 15): 1959–1982.10.1029/JB073i006p01959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian (1995), “Induction”, in Audi, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 368–369.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (1993). “Credentialing Scientific Claims”, Perspectives on Science 1/2: 153–203.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (1997), “Science Without Induction”, in Earman, John and Norton, John D. (eds.), The Cosmos of Science: Essays of Exploration. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, and Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz, pp. 386–429.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (1998) “The Structure of a Scientific Paper”, Philosophy of Science65: 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar