Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T09:41:15.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science Nominalized Properly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Terence Horgan
Terence Horgan*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy Memphis State University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although Hale and Resnik are correct in their specific objection to my proposal for nominalizing science, the proposal can be saved by means of a simple and plausible modification.

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , June 1987, pp. 281 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Hale, S. C., and Resnick, M. D. (1987), “Science Nominalized?”, Philosophy of Science 54: 277–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. (1984), “Science Nominalized”, Philosophy of Science 51: 529–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar