Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:37:37.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shapere on Observation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Toby Linden*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland at College Park
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, 4360 Computer and Space Science Building, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD 20742-7615, USA.

Abstract

In his article “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy” (1982), Dudley Shapere argues for an analysis of what it is for an object to be directly observed (observable). He does so by presenting two contrasting ways of observing the center of the sun. However, his examples, which are probabilistic in nature, are at odds with his analysis, which is absolute. I argue that of the three features of the examples which could serve as the basis for the analysis only one—the amount of alteration to the information being transmitted—can plausibly do so. Having reworked Shapere's analysis on the basis of this feature, I show that the analysis still fails to provide a sufficient condition for observation.

Information

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable