Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:29:02.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Notice: Freud, Philosophical and Empirical Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Frank Cioffi
Frank Cioffi
Affiliation:
Canterbury
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Those who are interested in Freud and psychoanalysis will be familiar with questions such as ‘Is Freudian psychology pseudo-scientific?’ ‘Is Freudian psychology falsifiable?’ ’Is unfalsifiability an adequate criterion of pseudo-science?’, and they might naturally suppose that it is these questions of which Erwin has attempted a ‘final accounting’. Surprisingly, these questions hardly feature in Erwin's book. Though at the outset Peter Medawar's notorious judgment that psychoanalysis is ‘the most stupendous intellectual confidence trick of the twentieth century’ is cited, Erwin does not seem to think it is part of his final accounting to say either whether he thinks it justified or, if not, why someone of Medawar's distinction should nevertheless have thought so.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 72 , Issue 281 , July 1997, pp. 435 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Alasdair, Maclntyre, ‘Psychoanalysis: the Future of an Illusion’, Against the Self-images of the Age (London: Duckworth, 1976), p. 35.Google Scholar

2 Ernest, Gellner, The Psychoanalytic Movement (London: Paladin, 1985), p. 162.Google Scholar

3 Paul, Kline, Fact and Fantasy in Freudian Theory (London: Methuen, 1972), p. 94; 1981, p. 129.Google Scholar

4 William, JamesThe Principles of Psychology (New York: Dover, 1950), p. 555.Google Scholar

5 Allen, Esterson, Seductive Mirage (Chicago: Open Court, 1993).Google Scholar

6 Paul, Meehl, ‘Some Methodological Reflections on the Difficulties of Psychoanalytic Research,’ Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 4, 1970), p. 407.Google Scholar

7 Sigmund, Freud, The Interpretation of Dreams (London: Allen & Unwin, 1954), p. 191.Google Scholar

8 Sigmund, Freud, Collected Papers, Vol. 3, (London: Hogarth, 1925), p. 65.Google Scholar

9 Sigmund, Freud, Collected Papers, Vol. 3, (London: Hogarth, 1925), p. 557.Google Scholar

10 Richard, Wollheim, Freud (London: Fontana, 1992), pp. 88–91.Google Scholar

11 Skinner, B. F., ‘Critique of Psychoanalytic Concept and Theories’, The Validation of Scientific Theories, (edited by Phillip, Frank) (New York: Collier, 1959), p. 12.Google Scholar

12 Paul, Robinson, Freund & his Critics, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), p. 229.Google Scholar

13 Allen, Esterson, ‘Grünbaum's Tally Argument’, History of the Human Sciences, February, 1996.Google Scholar

14 Sigmund, Freud, Collected Papers, Vol. 3 (London: Hogarth, 1925), p. 245.Google Scholar

15 Sigmund, Freud, Collected Papers, Vol. 3(London: Hogarth, 1925), p. 480.Google Scholar

16 Nagel, T., ‘Freud's Permanent Revolution’, New York Review of Books, (May 12, 1994).Google Scholar

17 Sigmund, Freud, Three Essays on Sexuality (London: Penguin, 1977), p. 112.Google Scholar

18 Sigmund, Freud, ‘The Psychoanalytic Movement’, Collected Papers, Vol. 1 (London: Hogarth, 1924), p. 300.Google Scholar

19 Sigmund, Freud, Autobiographical Study (London: Hogarth, 1950), p. 70.Google Scholar

20 Adolf, Grünbaum, ‘The Degeneration of Popper's Theory of Demarcation’, in Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honor of John Watkins, (ed. by Fred, D'Agostino and Ian, Jarvie) (Boston, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1989).Google Scholar

21 Cioffi, F., ‘Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-science and Testability’, Popper and the Human Sciences (ed. by Currie, G. and Musgrave, A.), (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985).Google Scholar

22 Griinbaum, A., Clinical Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis, (Madison, Connecticut: International Universities Press, Inc., 1993), p. 50.Google Scholar

23 Sigmund, Freud, Outline of Psychoanalysis (London: Hogarth, 1949), p. 56.Google Scholar

24 Cioffi, F., ‘“Exegetical Myth-Making” in Griinbaum's Indictment of Popper and Exoneration of Freud’, in Psychoanalysis and Theories of the Mind, (ed. by Crispin, Wright and Peter, Clark), (Blackwell, 1988). pp. 61–87.Google Scholar