¹ R. M., Hare, ‘What is Wrong with Slavery’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (1978–1979), 103: Hare understands slavery as a legal condition such, that the victim's ‘rights’, if any, are defined solely by laws she has no part in making, and such that she has herself no right of appeal against her ‘owner’. The Camaican regime, in his account, is the product of inefficient government rather than anarchist principle.Google Scholar

² P., Singer, Animal Liberation (London: Cape, 1977): this is not to say that I do not advocate these reforms!Google Scholar

³ R., Frey, Interests and Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).Google Scholar

⁴ L., von Mises, Liberalism, trans. R. Raico, A. Goddard (ed.) (Kansas City: Sheed Andre & McMeel, 1978), 21.Google Scholar

⁵ Cited by S. E., Mead, The Lively Experiment (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), 82.Google Scholar

⁶ M., Harris, Cows, Pigs, Wars and Witches (New York: Random House, 1974).Google Scholar

⁷ See my The Sature of the Beast (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

⁸ Aristotle, Politics I, 1254a24f.

⁹ See L., Tiger and R., Fox, The Imperial Animal (London: Seeker & Warburg, 1971); E. O. Wilson, Sociobiology (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

¹⁰ ‘Aristotle's Woman’, History of Political Thought 3, No. 2 (Summer 1982), 177.

¹¹ W. W., Fortenbaugh, ‘Aristotle on Slaves and Women’, Articles on Aristotle, II; J.Barnes, M.Schofield, R.orabji (eds) (London: Duckworth, 1977), 135. See my Aristotle's Man (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar

¹² Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics VII, 1148b32f.

¹³ Aristotle, Politics III, 1285 a18f.

¹⁴ 14 Aristotle, Politics I, 1252 b4f.

¹⁵ Aristotle, Sicomachean Ethics VIII, 1156a6ff.

¹⁶ K. A., Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957).Google Scholar

¹⁷ J., Jaynes, The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Aristotle, Politics III, 1287b4f.

¹⁹ Lisa, Newton, ‘The Profoundest Respect for Law’, Anarchism: Nomos, XIX, J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds) (New York: New York University Press, 1978), 165.Google Scholar

²⁰ T. R., Machan, Human Rights and Human Liberties (Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1975), 71; see also D. Rasmussen, ‘Essentialism, Values and Rights’, The Libertarian Reader, T. R. Machan (ed.) (Totowa, New Jersey: Rowan& Littlefield, 1982), 37.Google Scholar

²¹ R., Cohen, The Origins of the State, R.Cohen and E. R. Service (eds) (Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Problems, 1978), 1.Google Scholar

^{22 1787}: The Antifederalist Papers, M.Borden (ed.), (Michigan State University Press, 1965), 2.Google Scholar

²³ J., Hospers, Libertarianism (Los Angeles: Nash, 1971), 60.Google Scholar

²⁴ L., Spooner to Grover Cleveland, 1886, p. 3: Let's Abolish Government (New York: Arno, 1972).Google Scholar

²⁵ J. R. R., Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings, I (London: Allen & Unwin, 1954), 18; see also Letters, H. Carpenter (ed.), (Logndon: Allen & Unwin, 1981), 64: ‘The most improper job of any man, even saints, is bossing other men’.Google Scholar

²⁶ See Machan, op. cit. 143: this is not to say that it would be best to remain solitary all one's life.

²⁷ H., Spencer, Man Versus the State (Caldwell, Idaho: Caxton, 1960), 41; R., Nozick, Anarchy, , State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974), 290.Google Scholar

²⁸ See M. N., Rothbard, The Ethics of Liberty (Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1982), 187, after A. J. Nock.Google Scholar

²⁹ H., Spencer, Principles of Sociology, I, 575; D. Wiltshire, The Social and Political Thought of H. Spencer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), 106.Google Scholar

³⁰ Mao, Tse-Tung, Thoughts of Chairman Mao (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1967), 163.Google Scholar

³¹ A., Bellegarigue: G. Woodcock, Anarchism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975), 258; E. Goldman, My Further Disillusionment in Russia (Garden City: Doubleday, 1924), 153.Google Scholar

³² C., Navari, ‘The Origins of the Nation-State’, The Nation-State L. Tivey (ed.) (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981), 17.Google Scholar

³³ T., Paine, Rights of Man, 1792, II, 1; G. Ostergaard, ‘Resisting the Nation-State’, Tivey, op. cit. 83.Google Scholar

³⁴ J. J., Martin, Men Against the State, (Colorado Springs: R. Myles, 1970: first printed DeKalb: Allen Ass, 1953), 4; Warren was very concerned for the right of children to independence; see also L. S., Moss, ‘Private Property Anarchism’, Further Explorations in the Theory of Anarchy, G. Tullock (ed.) (Blacksburg, Virginia: University Publications, 1974), 1.Google Scholar

³⁵ The Essential Kropotkin, E., Capouya and K. Tompkins (eds) (London: Macmillan, 1976), 39.Google Scholar

³⁶ Aristotle, Politics, III, 1280a25ff.

³⁷ Kropotkin: Capouya and Tompkins, op. cit. 110.

³⁸ Bakunin: D., Guerin, Anarchism, trans. M. Klopper (London: Monthly Review Press, 1970), 67. Amoralism is an infection that gravely damaged Benjamin Tucker, another great libertarian, as well. Anarchists who draw their inspiration from Spooner or Kropotkin are less confused.Google Scholar

³⁹ T. Jefferson to Cabell, 1816: A., Koch, The Philosophy of Thomas Jefferson (New York: Columbia University Press, 1943), 163.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Jefferson: A., Koch, Power, Morals and the Founding Fathers (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1961), 29.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Jefferson: Writings, V, 116: S. G., Brown, The First Republicans (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1954), 12.Google Scholar

⁴² Jefferson to Madison, 1785: Brown, op. cit. 51.

⁴³ M. P., Follett, Dynamic Administration, H. C. Metcalf and L. Urwick (eds) (Bath: Management Publications Trust Ltd, 1941), 30; see also F. C., Thayer, An End to Hierarchy! An End to Competition! (New York: Franklin Watts, 1973).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Follett, op. cit. 39.

⁴⁵ J. W., Burton, Systems, States, Diplomacy and Rules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968), 23.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ See A., Collier, R.D., Laing: The Philosophy and Politics of Psychotherapy (Hassocks: Harvester, 1977), 36.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Mead, op. cit. 100.