No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
The thesis which I wish to recommend to you is that science is a form of art though not of fine art: that like art, it is a human invention, not less real for that, and having value, or being valuable, partly if not mainly because of that. I mean to indicate by this statement that for me at least a better insight can be got into the nature of science by considering it as a form of art, and asking how it differs from and how it resembles fine art.
Information
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1926
References
page 5 Note 1 Read before the Bedford College Philosophical Society on November 25, 1925.
page 10 Note 1 Cf. Browning’s “With this same key Shakespeare unlocked his heart.” Once more! Did Shakespeare? If so, the less Shakespeare he.
page 11 Note 1 Art. Clive Bell (new edition) London, 1924. If only for lack of space I am unable to discuss this phrase, or in general the question of what a work of art contains, its contents.
page 11 Note 2 George Frederick Watts. By Watts, M. S.. Vol. iii. p. 12, London, 1912.Google Scholar
page 13 Note 1 Cf. in Wordsworth’s poem on the poet: In common things that round us lie Some random truths he can impart.
page 13 Note 2 Art and the Material. Manchester University Press. 1925.
page 16 Note 1 Hence, I may observe, the room left for individual (almost artistic) style in scientific exposition.
page 18 Note 1 A.B.C. of Relativity. London, 1925.
You have
Access
- 1
- Cited by