^{page 504 note 1} Milford, fourth impression, 1926.

^{page 504 note 2} Idea of the Holy, p. 12

^{page 504 note 3} Loc. cit.

^{page 505 note 1} The phrases are Kant's.

^{page 505 note 2} Threshold of Religion, London, 1909, Pref., p. xi.Google Scholar

^{page 505 note 3} Ibid., p. xvi.

^{page 505 note 4} Op. cit., p. 124.

^{page 505 note 5} Loc. cit.

^{page 505 note 6} Op. cit., p. 120, from Codrington.

^{page 505 note 7} Op. cit., p. 121, from Tregear.

^{page 505 note 8} Op. cit., p. 125, from M'Gee.

^{page 507 note 1} Idea of the Holy, chap, xvii, p. 140 f.

^{page 507 note 2} Ibid., p. 130.

^{page 508 note 1} Idea of the Holy, p. 131.

^{page 510 note 1} That is, of course, as an ‘ a priori category.’ For the a posteriori argument, disavowed, or rather (on their own showing) transcended, by theories of ‘ experience,’ see below.

^{page 511 note 1} Idea of the Holy, pp. 140–1.

^{page 515 note 1} Dewey, , Experience and Nature (1925), pp. 17, 18.Google Scholar (Italics of the last sentence mine.)