Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:07:33.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impossibility of ‘Possible’ Worlds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2001

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The gist of these objections to the possible world account of necessity is that, for it to be true, ‘possible’ would have to be a name for an attribute. But to say that something is possible is not to describe it, but to say that there could be such a thing. And possibilities are not classes of entities. Possible worlds have been described as ways, but a way of getting to London from Cambridge is not an entity, and that there is a way is entailed by facts such as that if you travel south along the M3, you will get there.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1999