^{page 216 note 1} E.g. Watson, : Philosophy of |Kant Explained, pp. 58–59Google Scholar. See also Green, T. H.: Works, II, p. 61Google Scholar.

^{page 216 note 2} Watson is being quoted.

^{page 217 note 1} It might be noted in passing that Descartes has the very same problem: it. appears in connection with sense-experience and its status as knowledge. He has to make use of the Deity to justify the synthesis of sense-qualities with extension or else sense-experience never is knowledge at all. Which alternative is the view of Descartes is not very clear. Kant's variation on Descartes' theme is interesting.

^{page 220 note 1} Critique of Pure Reason: Introd. VI.

^{page 220 note 2} Treatise of Human Nature, Bk. I, Part III, Sect. i.

^{page 221 note 1} Enquiry, Sect, iv. Part i. cf. Treatise, Bk. I, Part III, Sect, ii and iii, I which is not in the formulation of the problem fundamentally different from the Enquiry.

^{page 222 note 1} Critique of Pure Reason: Introd. VI n.

^{page 224 note 1} Broad, : Scientific Thought, pp. 171 fGoogle Scholar.

^{page 225 note 1} Scientific Thought, p. 176.

^{page 226 note 1} Treatise, Bk. I, Part I, Sect. vii. But the point is fundamental to his view of space.

^{page 227 note 1} Critique of Pure Reason: Analytic of Principles, Ch. II, Sect. iii.

^{page 228 note 1} Critique of Pure Reason: Analytic of Conceptions, Ch. II, Sect, ii, 22Google Scholar.

^{page 228 note 2} Ibid., or remarks on the three Analogies, following on Third Analogy.

^{page 229 note 1} Kant, 's Metaphysic of Experience, II, p. 283Google Scholar.

^{page 229 note 2} Commentary on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, pp. 364–65.

^{page 230 note 1} Critique of Pure Reason: System of the Principles of the Pure Understanding, Ch. II, Sect. iiiGoogle Scholar.

^{page 230 note 2} Ibid.

^{page 231 note 1} The Postulates of Empirical Thought. (Just before the Refutation of Idealism.)