Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T14:40:04.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kant's Treatment of Animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Alexander Broadie
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Elizabeth M. Pybus
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Some of the greatest writers on moral philosophy have claimed that their theories about morality do not run counter to the moral views of ordinary men, but on the contrary are an elucidation of such views, or provide them with a sound philosophical underpinning. Aristotle, for example, made it quite clear that he could not take seriously a moral view that was at odds with the heritage of moral wisdom deeply imbedded in his society. His doctrine of the mean was based on a philosophical consideration of such wisdom. And Immanuel Kant thought that his moral philosophy articulated the moral views of ordinary men.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1974