Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T04:32:38.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nature of Artifacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Michael Losonsky
Michael Losonsky
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Book II, Chapter 1 of the Physics Aristotle attempts to distinguish natural objects from artifacts. He begins by stating that a natural object ‘has in itself a source of change and staying unchanged, whether in respect of place, or growth and decay, or alteration’. But this is not sufficient to distinguish natural objects from artifacts. As he points out later, a wooden bed, for example, can rot or burn, and this is surely a change whose source is, in part, internal to the bed. To make his distinction, Aristotle writes that in a natural object the internal ‘source of change and remaining unchanged’ belongs to it ‘primarily and of itself, that is, not by virtue of concurrence’. The bed rots because it happens to be made of wood: the change is due to its material, not due to its essence, namely that it is a bed. A natural object, however, changes because of its essence, that is, because it is the natural object that it is.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 65 , Issue 251 , January 1990 , pp. 81 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Physics, trans. Charlton, W. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974), 192b20–2Google Scholar; also see 193a10–17.

2 Ibid., 192b15–20.

3 ‘A New System of the Nature and the Communication of Substances’, Philosophical Papers and Letters, Loemker, L. (ed.) (University of Chicago Press, 1956), 745 and 747.Google Scholar

4 Wiggins, David, Sameness and Substance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980), 89.Google Scholar

5 Schwartz, Stephen P. ‘Putnam on Artifacts’, Philosophical Review 87 (1978), 566–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 ‘Referring to Artifacts’, Philosophical Review 89 (1980), 109–114.Google Scholar

7 Wiggins, , 87.Google Scholar

8 Marx, , Economic Manuscripts of 1857–58, Collected Works (New York: International Publishers, 1986), Vol. 28, 285.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., 29.

10 White, Lynn Jr, Medieval Technology and Social Change (Oxford University Press, 1964), 41–57.Google Scholar

11 For example see Cadwallader, Martin, Analytical Urban Geography (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985)Google Scholar; Golden, Hilda H., Urbanization and Cities (Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1981)Google Scholar; or Mumford, Lewis, The City in History (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961).Google Scholar

12 Grazis, Denos C., (ed.), Traffic Science (New York: John Wiley, 1974).Google Scholar

13 Edie, Leslie C., ‘Flow Theories’Google Scholar, Grazis, , op. cit., 2.Google Scholar

14 Meditations on First Philosophy, trans. Cottingham, John (Cambridge University Press, 1986), 58.Google Scholar

15 Works, (London: W. Johnston and others, 1772), Vol. 5, 443Google Scholar. Quoted in Macey, Samuel L., Clocks and the Cosmos (Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books, 1980), 89f.Google Scholar

16 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Book III, Ch. 6, sec. 3, Nidditch, Peter H. (ed.) (Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

17 Landes, David S., Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983), 53–58.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., 9.

19 Ibid., 6.

20 See Britten's Watch and Clock Maker's Handbook, 15th edn (Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1955)Google Scholar, or Rawlings, A. L., The Science of Clocks and Watches (Luling, TX: Caldwell Industries, 1974).Google Scholar

21 Landes, , 135.Google Scholar

22 Britten, , 318Google Scholar. Also see Honig, Peter Scott, ‘History and Mathematical Analysis of the Fusee’, in The Clockwork Universe, Maurice, K. and Mayr, O. (eds) (New York: Neal Walton, 1980), 114–120.Google Scholar

23 Ibid., 76. This is corroborated by the fact that the introduction of equal hours in Japan coincides with the introduction of the mechanical clock after 1866. See Bedini, Silvio, ‘Oriental Concepts of the Measure of Time—The Role of the Mechanical Clock in China and Japan’, The Study of Time, Fraser, J. T. and Lawrence, N. (eds) (New York: Springer Verlag, 1975), 451–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 See the work of Derek de Solla Price, cited in Landes, , 54 and 402.Google Scholar

25 In addition to Landes, see de Grazia, Sebastian, Of Time, Work and Leisure (Garden City: Doubleday and Co., 1962), 289–312Google Scholar; Mumford, Lewis, Technics and Civilization (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1934, reprinted 1943)Google Scholar; and Rifkin, Jeremy, Time Wars: The Primary Conflict in Human History (New York: Henry Holt, 1987).Google Scholar

26 Landes, , 124ff.Google Scholar

27 I wish to thank Carl Steen for introducing me to the sciences of artifacts and Jim Fetzer for encouragement.