Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T06:13:05.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Privacy and the Right to Privacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

H. J. McCloskey
H. J. McCloskey
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The right to privacy is one of the rights most widely demanded today. Privacy has not always so been demanded. The reasons for the present concern for privacy are complex and obscure. They obviously relate both to the possibilities for very considerable enjoyment of privacy by the bulk of people living in affluent societies brought about by twentieth-century affluence, and to the development of very efficient methods of thoroughly and systematically invading this newly found privacy. However, interesting and important as it is as a socio-philosophical inquiry, the concern of this paper is not with why privacy has come to be so highly prized, but rather with whether it is rightly prized, and if so, when and why. This means that my concern will be with what privacy is, what is its domain, whether there is a right to privacy, and, if so, whether it is an ultimate, basic, albeit, a prima facie right, or simply a conditional right.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 55 , Issue 211 , January 1980, pp. 17 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Stephen, J. F., Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, White, R. J. (ed.) (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1967), 160. First edition (London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1873).Google Scholar

2 Warren, S. D. and Brandeis, L. D., ‘The Right to Privacy’, Harvard Law Review IV, No. 5 (12 1890–1991), 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Op. cit., 206.

4 Ernst, M. L. and Schwartz, A. U., The Right to Be Let Alone (New York: Macmillan & Co., 1962), 17.Google Scholar

5 Clarke, C. F. O., Private Rights and the Freedom of the Individual (Enstone; The Ditchley Foundation, 1972), 8.Google Scholar

6 Beardsley, E., ‘Privacy: Autonomy and Selective Disclosure’, Nomos XIII 1971 (J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds) New York; Atherton), 70.Google Scholar

7 Westin, A. F., Privacy and Freedom, 1971 (London; Bodley Head, 1967), 7.Google Scholar

8 Parker, R. B., ‘A Definition of Privacy’, Rutgers Law Review 27, No 1 (Summer 1974), 275–296.Google Scholar

9 McCloskey, H. J., ‘The Political Ideal of Privacy’, Philosophical Quarterly, 21 No. 85 (10 1971), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 van den Haag, E., ‘On Privacy’, Nomos XIII (1971), 149.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., 151.

12 Thomson, J. J., ‘The Right to Privacy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 4, No. 4 (Summer 1975), 295–314.Google Scholar

13 Fried, C., ‘Privacy’, Yale Law Journal, 77, No. 3 (01 1967–1968), 475–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Fried, C., An Anatomy of Values: Problems of Personal and Social Choice (Cambridge: Harvard, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 ‘Privacy’, op. cit., 477–478.Google Scholar

16 Rachels, J., ‘Why Privacy is Important’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 4, No. 4 (Summer 1974), 323–333.Google Scholar

17 Benn, S. I., ‘Privacy, Freedom and Respect for Persons’, Nomos XIII (1971), 1–26.Google Scholar

18 Reiman, J. H., ‘Privacy, Intimacy and Personhood’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, No. 1 (Fall 1976), 26–44, esp. 29–39.Google Scholar

19 Hofstadter, S. H. and Horowitz, G., The Right To Privacy (New York: Central Book Co, 1964), 7.Google Scholar

20 Freund, P. A., ‘Privacy: One Concept or Many’, Nomos XIII (1971), 182–198.Google Scholar