No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Punishment as Language
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
A number of philosophers and legal scholars have pointed out a fact about punishment that had not been sufficiently appreciated by many traditional accounts, utilitarian, retributive, or ‘mixed’: that evil inflicted on the person punished is not an evil simpliciter, but rather the expression of an important social message—that punishment is a kind of language. The message which it is seen to communicate can broadly be described as condemnation by society of the crime committed. In what is still the only attempt at a general and critical discussion— Anthony Skillen's ‘How to say Things with Walls’—this way of understanding punishment is termed ‘expressionism’. In this paper I propose to sort out the main varieties of expressionism in the philosophy of punishment, and to discuss some of their pros and cons.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1989
References
1 Skillen, A. J., ‘How to Say Things with Walls’, Philosophy 55 (1980), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Feinberg, J., ‘The Expressive Function of Punishment’, Doing and Deserving (Princeton University Press, 1970), 98.Google Scholar
3 Ibid., 100.
4 Stephen, J. F., A General View of the Criminal Laws of England (London: Macmillan, 1863), 99.Google Scholar
5 Stephen, J. F., A History of the Criminal Law of England (London: Macmillan, 1883), Vol. 2, 81.Google Scholar
6 Durkheim, E., The Division of Labor in Society, trans, by Simpson, G. (New York: The Free Press, 1964), 103.Google Scholar
7 Durkheim, E., Moral Education, Wilson, E. K. (ed.), trans, by Wilson, E. K. and Schnurer, H. (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1961), 176.Google Scholar
8 Durkheim, E., The Division of Labor in Society, 108.Google Scholar
9 Ewing, A. C., ‘Punishment as Viewed by the Philosopher’, The Canadian Bar Review 21 (1943), 116.Google Scholar
10 Ewing, A. C., The Morality of Punishment (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1929), 84.Google Scholar
11 Ewing, A. C., ‘Punishment as Moral Agency’, Mind 36 (1927), 297.Google Scholar
12 Bentham, J., Principles of Penal Law, Works, Bowring, J. (ed.) (New York: Russell & Russell, 1962), Vol. I, 398.Google Scholar
13 Hampton, J., ‘The Moral Education Theory of Punishment’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (1984), 230.Google Scholar
14 Duff, R. A., Trials and Punishments (Cambridge University Press, 1986), 266Google Scholar. (Duff's version of expressionism is not of the extrinsic type.)
15 In this section and at the beginning of the next I draw on section VI of my ‘The Middle Way in the Philosophy of Punishment’, Gavison, R. (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H. L. A. Hart (Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
16 Hart, H. L. A., Law, Liberty and Morality (Oxford University Press, 1963), 65 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
17 Ibid., 66.
18 Skillen, A. J., op. cit., 517.Google Scholar
19 Cf. e.g. Weber, M., ‘Politics as a Vocation’, Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967), 77–78.Google Scholar
20 Bradley, F. H., Ethical Studies, 2nd edn (London: Oxford University Press, 1962), 26.Google Scholar
21 Charvet, J., ‘Criticism and Punishment’, Mind 75 (1966), 578.Google Scholar
22 Skillen, A. J., op. cit., 521.Google Scholar
23 Cf. Hart, H. L. A., The Morality of the Criminal Law (Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, 1964), 39–41.Google Scholar
24 Skillen, A. J., op. cit., 521–522.Google Scholar
25 An earlier, much shorter version of this paper was read at the 12th International Wittgenstein Symposium in Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria, in August 1987.
You have
Access
- 59
- Cited by