Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:49:58.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Saints and Heroes’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Elizabeth M. Pybus
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In his article ‘Saints and Heroes’, Urmson argues that traditional moral theories allow at most for a threefold classification of actions in terms of their worth, and that they are therefore unsatisfactory. Since the conclusion of his argument has led to the widespread use of the term ‘acts of supererogation’, and since I do not believe that such acts exist, I propose to argue that the actions with which he is concerned not only can, but should, be contained within the traditional classification.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1980