Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T15:36:02.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symbol and Myth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Alexander Altmann
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are two ways in which Symbol and Myth are related to each other. Firstly, a certain class of symbols represents the remnant of myths. Such figures as, e.g. the Dragon, Leviathan, etc., which we find in Biblical literature, are not used in the full sense of the underlying mythological conception, but in a metaphorical sense. They are chosen by the author because of their mythical associations, but not in their mythical meaning. Ametaphor of this kind is, as H. J. D. Astley put it, “broken-down mythology.” There are a great many symbols both in poetry and mysticism which must be understood as the relics of mythical thought. We owe a great deal to ethnology for having thrown light on this relation. The microcosm-macrocosm symbolism, for instance, becomes more intelligible if we consider that in primitive mythology the world emerged from the body of primordial man. The gifts to the dead appear in later forms of sacrificial cults as purely symbolical, but there is no doubt that originally they were intended for the real use of the dead. In these and in numerous other cases the symbol has only a reduced value as compared with the original-myth from which it is borrowed. It is not self-evident, but relies on the mythical conception, without, however, taking it seriously. It is “merely” a symbol, and has no truth of its own.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 20 , Issue 76 , July 1945, pp. 162 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

page 162 note 1 Cf. Astley, H. J. A., Biblical Anthropology, p. 86Google Scholar.

page 162 note 2 Cf. Cassirer, E., Philosophic der symbolischen Formen, II, pp. 115–116Google Scholar.

page 162 note 3 Cf. Cassirer, loc. cit., II, p. 198.

page 162 note 4 Cf. Bachofen, J. J., Versuch über die Gräbersymbolik der Alien, Basle, 1859Google Scholar.

page 163 note 1 For an exposition and evaluation of the Romantic School, cf. Baumler, A.'s Introduction to Der Mythos von Orient u. Okzident, ed. Schroeter, M., 1926Google Scholar.

page 163 note 2 Cf. Allwohn, A., Der Mythos bei Schelling, 1927, pp. 32–33Google Scholar.

page 164 note 1 Cf. A. Bäumler, loc. cit., pp. 101–102.

page 164 note 2 See also Dacqué, E., Urwelt, Sage und Menschheit 1928, pp. 20–38Google Scholar.

page 164 note 3 Cf. A. Bäumler, loc. cit., p. 103.

page 165 note 1 Cf. Freud, S., Totem and Taboo (Translated by Brill, H. A.), pp. v, xiiGoogle Scholar.

page 165 note 2 Cf. Jung, C. G., Wirklichkeit der Seele, 1934, p. 66Google Scholar; Seelenprobleme der Gegenwart, 1932, p. 396Google Scholar.—Our exposition of Jung is indebted to Kellner, K., C. G. Jung's Philosophie auf der Grundlage seiner Tiefenpsychologie, 1937Google Scholar.

page 166 note 1 Cf. Jung, C. G., Psychology and Religion, pp. 64, 122–123Google Scholar.

page 166 note 2 Cf. Jung, C. G., Seelenprobleme, etc., p. 175Google Scholar.

page 166 note 3 Cf. Jung, C. G., Psychologische Typen, 1930, p. 598Google Scholar.

page 166 note 4 Cf. Jung, C. G., Das Unbewusste im normalen und kranken Seelenleben, 1926, p. 101Google Scholar.

page 166 note 5 Cf. Psychol. Typen, p. 645.

page 166 note 6 Cf. Jung, C. G., über die Energetik der Seele, 1928, p. 76Google Scholar.

page 167 note 1 Cf. Seelenpr., pp. 165–166.

page 167 note 2 Cf. Psychol. Typen, p. 657.

page 169 note 1 Cf. Bevan, Edwyn, Symbolism and Belief, 1938, pp. 11–13Google Scholar.

page 169 note 2 Cf. Dumas, G., Le symbolisme dans langue, in Revue Philosopkique de la France et de L'Etranger, 59, CXVII, 1934, p. 8Google Scholar ff.

page 169 note 3 Cf. Edmund Husserl, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (Translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson), §§ 36 and 43

page 170 note 1 Cf. Cohen, Hermann, Die Religion der Vernunfi aus den Quetten des Juden-tums, 1913Google Scholar.

page 170 note 2 Cf. loc. cit., p. 152.

page 170 note 3 Cf. loc. cit.; see also Söderblom, Nathan, The Living God, pp. 265 ff.Google Scholar; Martin Buber, I and Thou.

page 170 note 4 Cf. Goldziher, I., Mythology among the Hebrews (Translated by Martineau, R., 1877)Google Scholar.

page 170 note 5 Cf. Gunkel, Hermann, Schüpfung und Chaos in Urzeit und Endzeit, 1921Google Scholar.

page 171 note 1 Cf. Scholem, G. G., Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, 1941Google Scholar.