^{page 141 note 1} Process and Reality, p. 29.

^{page 143 note 1} “Prehension” is a technical term which can most simply be explained as meaning “apprehension” without the “ap-,” i.e. without awareness. Whitehead points out that Bacon regarded objects as all “perceiving” one another to the extent that they affected each other.

^{page 144 note 1} Consider a percipient event (P) at region A. Now the mode of a sense-object “green” at A (abstracted from the sense-object whose relationship to region A the mode is conditioning) is the aspect from A of some other region B. The sense-object “green” relates region A to region B. That is to say, the mode of the sense-object “green” at A is expressible as location elsewhere.

^{page 144 note 2} Whitehead maintains (as did Leibniz) that, while consciousness is a rare character in the universe, only found in association with high-grade organisms, “experience” is universal, because all actual entities prehend one another.

^{page 146 note 1} Science and the Modern World, p. 245.

^{page 153 note 1} Cf. Science and the Modern World, p. 245Google Scholar.

^{page 153 note 2} Ibid., p. 247.

^{page 154 note 1} Science and the Modern World, p. 249.

^{page 155 note 1} The most fruitful way of conceiving God's “eternal” nature is to think of it as a vision and “valuation” of the realm of eternal forms, accompanied by an urge for their actualization in an orderly way in finite things.

^{page 156 note 1} Process and Reality, p. 487.

^{page 156 note 2} Ibid., p. 468.

^{page 157 note 1} Process and Reality, pp. 493–4.

^{page 158 note 1} Process and Reality, p. 489.

^{page 158 note 2} Ibid., p. 490.

^{page 158 note 3} Ibid., p. 495.

^{page 158 note 4} Ibid., p. 496.

^{page 159 note 1} Process and Reality, p. 486.

^{page 159 note 2} Ibid., p. 496.

^{page 160 note 1} Lecture on “Immortality” in The Philosophy of Alfred Frank Whitehead (North-Western University Press, 1941)Google Scholar.