Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T00:36:53.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the phoneme as the unit of the ‘second articulation’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Bruce L. Derwing ,
Terrance M. Nearey  and
Maureen L. Dow
Bruce L. Derwing
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Terrance M. Nearey
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Maureen L. Dow
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reviews the recent experimental evidence bearing on the issue of the psychological reality of the phoneme, particularly its general CLASS character, the relative NON-DISCRIMINABILITY of its positional variants (allophones), and its status as a discrete SEGMENT. Evidence bearing on a few selected problems of English phonemics is also discussed. All of the experiments cited, however, seem to have been to some extent contaminated by orthographic effects; moreover, a host of other studies go so far as to suggest that knowledge of spelling may not only impinge critically on phonological judgements, but that the very ability to segment speech may be a by-product of learning an alphabetic orthography. But as the experiments to date have been largely restricted to overt judgements about a rather limited range of words, the possibility still remains open that a phonemic segmentation of speech may well occur at an unconscious, perceptual level even in the pre-literate period.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 3 , May 1986 , pp. 45 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, W. J. & Derwing, B. L. (1982). Response coincidence analysis as evidence for language acquisition strategies. Applied Psycholinguistics 3. 193–221.Google Scholar
Baker, W. J.Prideaux, G. D. & Derwing, B. L. (1973). Grammatical properties of sentences as a basis for concept formation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2. 201–220.Google Scholar
Baron, J.Treiman, R.Wilf, J. F. & Kellman, P. (1980). Spelling and reading by rules. In Frith, (1980a). 159–194.Google Scholar
Barton, D.Miller, R. & Macken, M. A. (1980). Do children treat clusters as one unit or two? Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 8. 105–137.Google Scholar
Bell, A. & Hooper, J. B. (eds.) (1978). Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review 65. 14–21.Google Scholar
Bruce, D. J. (1964). The analysis of word sounds by young children. British Journal of Educational Psychology 34. 158–170.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1975). Invented spelling in the open classroom. Word 27. 499–518.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. (1973). Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. (1976). Morpheme recognition and the learning of rules for derivational morphology. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 21. 38–66.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. (1979). Psycholinguistic evidence and linguistic theory. In Prideaux, G. D. (ed.) Perspectives in experimental linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 113–138.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. & Baker, W. J. (1980). Rule learning and the English inflections (with special emphasis on the plural). In Prideaux, G. D.Derwing, B. L. & Baker, W. J. (eds.) Experimental linguistics: integration of theories and applications. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia. 247–272.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. & Nearey, T. M. (1981). On the perceptibility of sub-phonemic differences: the tough-duck experiment. Journal of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association 3. 29–40.Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L. & Nearey, T. M. (1986). Experimental phonology at the University of Alberta. In Ohala & Jaeger (1986). 187–209.Google Scholar
Dow, M. L. (1981). On the role of orthography in experimental phonology. MSc thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Dow, M. L. (forthcoming). The psychological reality of sub-syllabic units. PhD dissertation, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. & Wilce, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers' conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics I. 371–385.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Lg 51. 419–439.Google Scholar
Fink, R. (1974). Orthography and the perception of stops after s. Language and Speech 17. 152–159.Google Scholar
Foss, D. J.Harwood, D. A. & Blank, M. A. (1980). Deciphering coding decisions: data and devices. In Cole, R. A. (ed.) Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 165–199.Google Scholar
Foss, D. J. & Swinney, D. A. (1973) On the psychological reality of the phoneme: perception, identification, and consciousness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12. 246–257.Google Scholar
Fox, B. & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: a developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 4. 331–342.Google Scholar
Fox, B. & Routh, D. K. (1980). Phonemic analysis and severe reading disability in children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 9. 115–119.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1948). Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. & Pike, K. L. (1949). Coexistent phonemic systems. Lg 25. 29–50.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (ed.) (1980a). Cognitive processes in spelling. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (1980b). Unexpected spelling problems. In Frith, (1980a). 495–515.Google Scholar
Fujimura, O. (1975). Syllables as a unit of speech recognition. IEEE transactions-ASSP 23. 82–87.Google Scholar
Fujimura, O. & Lovins, J. B. (1978). Syllables as concatenative phonetic units. In Bell, & Hooper, (1978). 107–120.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1978). An introduction to descriptive linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M. (1978). Critique: phonemic awareness skills and reading achievements. In Murray, F. B. & Pikulski, J. J. (eds.) The acquisition of reading: cognitive, linguistic, and perceptual prerequisites. Baltimore: University Park Press. 23–41.Google Scholar
Healy, A. F. & Cutting, J. E. (1976). Units of speech perception: phoneme and syllable. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15. 73–83.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1971). Linguistic speculations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, L. (1972). Mr. Chomskyon the phoneme. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. J. (1980a). Categorization in phonology: an experimental approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. J. (1980b). Testing the psychological reality of phonemes. Language and Speech 23. 233–253.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. J. (1984). Assessing the psychological status of the Vowel Shift Rule. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13. 13–36.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. J. & Ohala, J. J. (1984). On the structure of phonetic categories. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting, Berkeley Linguistics Society. 15–26.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell. Translated (1968) as Child Language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1950). The phoneme: its nature and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerek, A. (1976). The phonological relevance of spelling pronunciation. Visible Language 10. 323–338.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. H. (1979). Speech perception: a model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. JPh 7. 279–312.Google Scholar
Levitt, J. (1978). The influence of orthography on phonology: a comparative study (English, French, Spanish, Italian, German). Linguistics 208. 43–67.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y.Shankweiler, D.Fischer, F. W. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18. 201–212.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. (1970). The voicing dimension: some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Hála, B.Romportl, M. & Janota, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague. Prague: Academia. 563–567.Google Scholar
Lotz, J.Abramson, A. S.Gerstman, L. J.Ingemann, F. & Nemser, W. J. (1960). The perception of English stops by speakers of English, Spanish, Hungarian, and Thai: a tape-cutting experiment. Language and Speech 3. 71–77.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. & Lindig, K. (1973). The perceptual reality of phonemes, syllables, words, and sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12. 419–430.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1964). Elements of general linguistics. Translated by Elisabeth, Palmer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1978). Phonological units in beginning speech. In Bell & Hooper (1978). 157–171.Google Scholar
Morais, J.Cary, L.Alegria, J. & Bertelsen, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition 7. 323–331.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. & Hogan, J. T. (1986). Phonological contrast in experimental phonetics: relating distributions of production data to perceptual categorization curves. In Ohala & Jaeger (1986). 141–161.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. I. & Nelson, L. D. (1970). Rated acoustic (articulatory) similarity for word pairs varying in number and ordinal position of common letters. Psychonomic Science 19. 81–82.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. & Jaeger, J. J. (eds.) (1986). Experimental phonology. Orlando, Fl.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
O'Neil, W. (1972). Our collective phonological illusions: young and old. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Mattingly, I. G. (eds.) Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 111–116.Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1976). Invented spelling in kindergarten. Young Children 31. 195–200.Google Scholar
Perin, D. (1983). Phonemic segmentation and spelling. British Journal of Psychology 74. 129–144.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1947). Phonemics: a technique for reducing languages to writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Read, C. (1971). Pre-school children's knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review 41. 1–34.Google Scholar
Read, C. (1973). Children's judgments of phonetic similarities in relation to English spelling. Language Learning 23. 17–38.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Moore, T. E. (ed.) Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press. 111–144.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, T. (1980). Reading of Hiragana. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Venezky, R. L. (eds.) Orthography, reading, and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press. 15–24.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1925). Sound patterns in language. Lg I. 37–51.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1933). La réalité psychologique des phonèmes. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 30. 247–265. Page references to translation ‘The psychological reality of phonemes’ in Makkai, V. B. (ed.) (1972). Phonological theory: evolution and current practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 22–31.Google Scholar
Savin, H. B. & Bever, T. G. (1970). The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9. 295–302.Google Scholar
Skjelfjord, V. J. (1976). Teaching children to segment spoken words as an aid to learning to read. Journal of Learning Disability 9. 297–306.Google Scholar
Skousen, R. (1982). English spelling and phonemic representation. Visible Language 16. 28–38.Google Scholar
Smith, I. (1982). Abstractness in phonology: the English velar nasal. Linguistics 20. 391–409.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1974). Speech perception. In Lass, N. J. (ed.) Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press. 243–282.Google Scholar
Trager, G. L. & Smith, H. L. (1957). An outline of English structure. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. & Baron, J. (1981). Segmental analysis ability: development and relation to reading ability. In Mackinnon, G. E. & Waller, T. G. (eds.) Reading research: advances in theory and practice. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. 159–198.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. & Breaux, A. M. (1982). Common phoneme and overall similarity relations among spoken syllables: their use by children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research II. 569–598.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 7. Translated (1969) by Baltaxe, C. A. M. as Principles of phonology. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vitz, P. C. & Winkler, B. S. (1973). Predicting the judged ‘similarity of sound’ of English words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12. 373–388.Google Scholar
Warren, R. M. (1982). Auditory perception: a new synthesis. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Waterson, N. (1971). Child phonology: a prosodic view. JL 7. 179–211.Google Scholar
Waterson, N. (1976). Perception and production in the acquisition of phonology. In von Raffler-Engel, W. & Lebrun, Y. (eds.) Baby talk and infant speech. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. 294–322.Google Scholar
Welz, T. T. (1982). Categorization and discrimination of word juncture in English. MSc thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Winer, B. F. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Zhurova, L. Ye. (1963). Razvitiye zvukovogo analiza slov u detey doshkol'nogo vozrasta. Voprosy psikhologii 9. 20–32. Translated as ‘The development of analysis of words into their sounds by preschool children’. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds.) (1973). Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 141–167.Google Scholar