Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:36:48.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The velar glide in Axininca Campa*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Cari Spring
Cari Spring
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Black (1991) proposes that the failure of Velar Glide Deletion in some contexts motivates an iambic typology in which a disyllabic iamb is better than a monosyllabic iamb. Velar Glide Deletion in Axininca fails when a demotion on the iambic scale would result from its application. However, empirical findings from epenthesis, the regressive marker, augmentation and comparative data from Caquinte Campa argue against this analysis. It is important to note the relationship between the assumption that the root + suffix constitutes the prosodic domain of Velar Glide Deletion, as argued by the typological analysis, and the conclusion that Velar Glide Deletion fails when a monosyllabic foot would result from a disyllabic one. If the suffix is abandoned as part of the prosodic domain for computing Velar Glide Deletion, the root alone is the prosodic domain prohibiting Velar Glide Deletion. In the latter case, the minimal word blocking Deletion is a regular, minimal quantity-sensitive foot.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , August 1992, pp. 329 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Black, A. (1991). The phonology of the velar glide in Axininca Campa. Phonology 8. 183–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golston, C. (1991). The so-called minimal word in Axininca Campa. Ms, UCLA.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1985). Iambic and trochaic rhythm in stress rules. BLS 11. 429–446.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, S. (1989). Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Itô, J. (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1986). OCP effects; gemination and antigemination. LI 17. 207–263.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1986). Prosodic morphology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Brandeis University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. NLLT 8. 209–283.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1991). Minimality. Paper presented at the Illinois Phonology Conference.Google Scholar
Payne, D. (1981). The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. University of Texas at Arlington and Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Payne, D., Payne, J. & Santos, J. Sanchez (1982). Morfología, fonología, y fonética del Ashéninca del Apurucayali. Pucallpa, Peru: Institute Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Payne, D. & Spring, C. (1989). Fieldnotes on Axininca Campa.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1992). Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. CLS 26:2. 355–397.Google Scholar
Spring, C. (1989a). Reduplication without affixes: the prosodic word base in Campa languages. Ms, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Spring, C. (1989b). The ternary foot in Axininca stress. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Spring, C. (1990). Implications of Axininca Campa for prosodic morphology and reduplication. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Spring, C. (1991). How many feet per language? WCCFL 9. 493–508.Google Scholar
Spring, C. (to appear). ‘Maximization’ explains minimal word variability. NELS 22.Google Scholar
Swift, K. (1985). Morphology of Caquinte. MA thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Yip, M. (1983). Some problems of syllable structure in Axininca Campa. NELS 13. 243–251.Google Scholar