Allison, A. F. “The Poetry of A. E. Housman,” Review of English Studies, xix (July, 1943), 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auden, W. H. “Jehovah Housman and Satan Housman,” New Verse, No. 28 (Jan., 1938), 16–17.Google Scholar

Auden, W. H. From Anneto Victoria. London: Cassell, 1938. Pp. 101.Google Scholar

Bailey, Ruth. A Dialogue on Modern Poetry. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1939. Pp. 40–42.Google Scholar

Barker, George. “A Study of Robert Bridges,” Nation, cliv (Aprile 4, 1942), 400.Google Scholar

Bayliss, Stanley. “Housman and the English Composer,” The Listener, xx (April 11, 1940). Reprinted as Appendix x in Grant Richards's Housman, pp. 452–453.Google Scholar

Blackmur, R. P. The Expense of Greatness. New York: Arrows, 1940. Pp. 202–205, 208.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. The Heritage of Symbolism. London: Macmillan, 1943. Pp. 32, 181, 182.Google Scholar

Brooks, Cleanth, and Warren, Robert Penn. Understanding Poetry. New York: Henry Holt, 1938. Pp. 384–387.Google Scholar

Brooks, Cleanth, and Warren, Robert Penn. Modern Poetry and the Tradition. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1939. Pp. 4, 15, 58.Google Scholar

Brooks, Cleanth, and Warren, Robert Penn. Purser, J. T., and Warren, R. P. An Approach to Literature. New York: F. S. Crofts, 1941. Pp. 442–443.Google Scholar

Brooks, Cleanth, and Warren, Robert Penn. “The Whole of Housman,” Kenyan Review, iii (Winter, 1941), 105–109.Google Scholar

Bullough, Geoffrey. The Trend of Modern Poetry. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1934, P. 5.Google Scholar

Bush, Douglas. Mythology and the Romantic Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1937. Pp. 474–475.Google Scholar

Chakravartz, Amiya. The Dynasts and the Post-War Age in Poetry. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1938. Pp. 4, 161, 168.Google Scholar

Daiches, David. Poetry and the Modem World. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1940. Pp. 19–22.Google Scholar

Drew, Elizabeth. Discovering Poetry. New York: W. W. Norton, 1933. Pp. 15, 27, 100, 167, 169, 182, 195.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism. London: Faber & Faber, 1933. Pp. 95, 144–145.Google Scholar

Empson, William. Some Versions of Pastoral. London: Chatto & Windus, 1935. Pp. 57–58.Google Scholar

Evans, B. Ifor. Tradition and Romanticism. London: Methuen, 1940. Pp. 3–4, 178.Google Scholar

Explicator. Vol. i. (April, 1943), item Q29 on ASL viii by R. T. R.; (May), item 57 on ASL ii by the Editors; (June), item 69 on ASL ii by W. L. Werner. Published at Fredericksburg, Virginia.Google Scholar

Explicator. “A. E. Housman Number,” vol. ii (March, 1944) item 34 on ASL i by T. S. K. Scott-Craig, with notes by Charles C. Walcutt and Cleanth Brooks. Item 35 on LP xxxvi by F. A. Philbrick and Ralph P. Boas. Item 36 on ASL viii by Frank Sullivan. Item 37 on ASL xliii by Louise S. Boas. Item 38 on LP xxxvii by W. L. Werner. Item 39 on MP ii by the Editors. Item 40, “Explications de texte on the Poetry of Housman: A Check-list,” by Robert Stallman.Google Scholar

Explicator. Vol. iii (Oct., 1944), item 6 on ASL xlii by Louise S. Boas: (Feb., 1945), item 26 on ASL xxxi by Robert Stallman.Google Scholar

Garrod, H. W. “Housman: 1939,” Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association, xxv (1939). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940. Pp. 7–21.Google Scholar

Graves, Robert. On English Poetry. London: Heinemann, 1922. Pp. 31–32.Google Scholar

Graves, Robert. Poetic Unreason. London: Cecil Palmer, 1925. Pp. 258–260, 263.Google Scholar

Grierson, H. J. C. Lyrical Poetry from Blake to Hardy. London: Hogarth Press, 1923. Pp. 122–123, 143, 153–154.Google Scholar

Grigson, Geoffrey. “Housman for Ourselves,” New Verse, No. 23 (Xmas 1936), 22–24.Google Scholar

Guerard, Albert. Robert Bridges: A Study of Traditionalism in Poetry. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1942. P, 56.Google Scholar

Haber, Tom Burns. “The Spirit of the Perverse in A. E. Housman,” South Atlantic Quarterly, xl (Oct., 1941), 368–378.Google Scholar

Haber, Tom Burns. “The Influence of the Ballads in Housman's Poetry,” Studies in Philology, xxxix (Jan., 1942), 118–129.Google Scholar

Holstein, Mark. “A Shropshire Lad,” Atlantic Monthly, clxxi (Jan., 1943), 83–93. [Of no critical value.]Google Scholar

Hughes, Glenn. Imagism and the Imagists. Stanford Univ., California: Stanford Univ. Press, 1941. P. 181.Google Scholar

Humphries, Rolfe. “A Disciple of Aristippus,” Nation, cliv (May 9, 1942), 550–552.Google Scholar

Jones, Ann. “The Shropshire Don,” Time and Tide, xxi (Jan. 20, 1940), 60–61.Google Scholar

Leavis, “English Letter,” Poetry, lx (Aug., 1934), 99.Google Scholar

Leavis, Revaluation: Tradition & Development in English Poetry. London: Chatto & Windus, 1936. P. 208.Google Scholar

Leavis, New Bearings in English Poetry. London: Chatto & Windus, 1938. Pp. 62–63, 66.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. Day. “A Hope for Poetry,” Collected Poems 1929–1933. New York: Random, 1935. Pp. 162, 169–170, 241, 250–252.Google Scholar

Lucas, F. L. The Decline and Fall of the Romantic Ideal. New York: Macmillan; Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1936. Pp. 44, 98, 154–155, 172–173.Google Scholar

Lynskey, Winifred. “A Critic in Action: Mr. J. C. Ransom,” College English, v (Feb., 1944), 240–242.Google Scholar

MacNeice, Louis. “Subject in Modern Poetry,” Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association, xxii (1937). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1938. P. 157.Google Scholar

MacNeice, Louis. Modern Poetry: A Personal Essay. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1938. Pp. 10, 28, 61, 78, 83–84, 87, 107, 125–126, 143, 154, 183.Google Scholar

MacNeice, Louis. The Poetry of W. B. Yeats. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1941. Pp. 68, 78, 158–159, 164, 211, 231.Google Scholar

Matthiessen, F. O. The Achievement of T. S. Eliot. London: Milford; Oxford Univ. Press, 1935. P. 2.Google Scholar

Miles, Josephine. “The Pathetic Fallacy and the Thing in Itself,” Poetry, lxi (Jan., 1944), 212–213, 216.Google Scholar

Putt, Gorley. “‘Go to the Professors‘!” Scrutiny, ii (Sept., 1933), 206–208. [Of no critical value.]Google Scholar

Ransom, John Crowe. The New Criticism. Norfolk: New Directions, 1941. P. 100.Google Scholar

Richards, Grant. Housman 1897–1936. With introd. by Mrs. E. W. Symons and appendixes by G. B. A. Fletcher and others. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Richards, I. A. Coleridge on Imagination: a Study of the critical theory of Coleridge. London: Regan Paul, 1934. Pp. 200–201, 205, 209–211.Google Scholar

Richmond, O. L. “Housman Considered Mainly as a Scholar,” University of Edinburgh Journal, ix (Autumn, 1938), 235.Google Scholar

Riding, Laura, and Graves, Robert. A Survey of Modernist Poetry. London: Heinemann, 1927. P. 198.Google Scholar

Ridley, M. R. Poetry and the Ordinary Reader. New York: Dutton, 1939. Pp. 82, 116.Google Scholar

Roberts, Michael. The Modern Mind. London: Faber & Faber, 1937. Pp. 239–246, 255.Google Scholar

Rylands, George H. W. Words and Poetry. London: Hogarth Press., 1928. Pp. 10, 29, 39, 41, 47, 65, 83, 103.Google Scholar

Sassoon, Siegfried. On Poetry. New York: Arrowsmith, 1939. Pp. 15–18.Google Scholar

Savage, D. S. The Personal Principle. London: Routledge, 1944. P. 64.Google Scholar

Schneider, Elizabeth. Aesthetic Motive. New York: Macmillan, 1939. Pp. 97–104.Google Scholar

Sitwell, Edith. Trio. London: Macmillan, 1938. Pp. 100–109.Google Scholar

Spender, Stephen. “The Essential Housman,” Horizon, i (April, 1940), 295–301.Google Scholar

Stallman, Robert. Dryden in Modern Poetry and Criticism. (Doctor's Thesis, University of Wisconsin: June, 1942). Pp. 33, 36–40, 42, 60, 185, 204, 451.Google Scholar

“The Triumph of Ben Jonson: Tests of Poetic Magic,” Times Literary Supplement, No. 1796 (July 4, 1936), 549–550.Google Scholar

Thomas, Wright, and Brown, Stuart Gerry. Reading Poems. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1941. Pp. 643–644, 754–756.Google Scholar

Tillyard, E. M. W. Poetry Direct and Oblique. London: Chatto & Windus, 1934. Pp. 164, 274.Google Scholar

Tillyard, E. M. W. and Lewis, C. S. The Personal Heresy; A Controversy. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1939. P. 29.Google Scholar

Trilling, Lionel. Matthew Arnold. New York: W. W. Norton, 1939. P. 177.Google Scholar

Trueblood, Charles. “Emily Dickinson,” Dial, lxxx (April, 1926), 309.Google Scholar

Vines, Sherard. Movements in Modern English Poetry and Prose. London: Oxford Univ. Press., 1927. Pp. 7–8, 39.Google Scholar

Walcutt, Charles Child. “Housman and the Empire: An Analysis of ‘1887,‘” College English, v (Feb., 1944), 255–258.Google Scholar

Ward, A. C. The Nineteen Twenties. London: Methuen, 1930. Pp. 51, 95.Google Scholar

Werner, W. L. “Housman's ‘1887‘—No Satire,” College Eng., vi (Dec, 1944), 165–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weygandt, Cornelius. The Time of Yeats. New York: Appleton-Century, 1937. Pp. 252–260.Google Scholar

Whitridge, Arnold. “Vigny and Housman: A Study in Pessimism,” American Scholar, x (Spring, 1941), 156–169.Google Scholar

Williams, Iolo. Poetry To-day. London: H. Jenkins, 1927. Pp. 60–67.Google Scholar

Winters, Yvor. Primitivism and Decadence. A Study of American ExperimentalGoogle Scholar

Poetry. New York: Arrows, 1937. P. 75.Google Scholar

Withers, Percy. A Buried Life: Personal Recollections of A. E. Housman. London: Cape, 1940.Google Scholar

Woodbridge, Benjamin M. “Poets and Pessimism: Vigny, Housman et Alii,” Romanic Rev., xxxv (1944), 43–51.Google Scholar

Yeats, W. B. Introduction to The Oxford Book of Modern Verse. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1936. P. xiii.Google Scholar

Zabel, Morton D. “The Intimate Stranger,” New Rep., cvi (April 13, 1942), 510–512.Google Scholar