¹ Early students of Franklin devoted considerable attention to Franklin's hoax without even mentioning Swift—some even praising Franklin for the originality of the idea Cf. James Parton, Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin (New York, 1864), i, 227 ff.; J. B. McMaster, Benjamin Franklin as a Man of Letters (Boston, 1882), chap, iv; John Bigelow, Life of Benjamin Franklin, 4th ed. (Phila., 1902), pt. ii, chap, vii; P. L. Ford, Many-Sided Franklin (New York, 1889), chap, x; P. L. Ford, Introduction to Sayings of Poor Richard (New York, 1889). In “Was Benjamin Franklin a Plagiarist?” (Bookman, iv, 24–30, Kate Stephen raises the question of Franklin's debt, quotes at length but without analysis, and concludes that Frankling “might not have known of'Squire Bickerstaff's jocularity” and that his hoax has the “vraisemblance of an original conception.” Paul Elmer More asserted the connection between Swift and Franklin, but left the point undeveloped, in Shelburne Essays (New York, 1906) p. 143. Bernard Faÿ is quoted in the note immediately following, and Carl Van Doren, in his recent Benjamin Franklin (New York, 1938) mentions the connection in a sentence (p. 107).

² Franklin … amused himself in his first almanac by continuing a witticism Swift had employed in his “Predictions for 1708 by Isaac Bickerstaff, Esquire,” who had violently and quaintly denounced the makers of almanacs by predicting the death of one of them, a man named Partridge … [This] did not escape Franklin's notice. So he announced boldly and with suavity (the element he added to Swift, who was more rough-shod in his attack) the death of his friend and colleague, Titan Leeds. The stars had made it known to him beyond a doubt, and Titan Leeds knew it very well too. This was the reason why Richard, who was not rich and had to make his living, had taken up the pen. Leeds was furious at this gruesome maneuver. He answered, stirring up a fine battle, to the great joy of Franklin, who needed just this advertisement to launch his book successfully. The quarrel lasted eight years, and ended by the clear triumph of Poor Richard, as Titan Leeds really died.—Bernard Faÿ, Franklin, the Apostle of Modern Times (Boston, 1929), pp. 161–162.

³ All quotations from Franklin, except where otherwise noted, are from Writings of Benjamin Franklin, 10 vols., A. H. Smyth, ed. (New York, 1905–07). All quotations from Swift are from Satires and Personal Writings, W. A. Eddy, ed. (London, 1932).—Temple Scott's edition of Swift's Prose Works lacks “Squire Bickerstaff Detected” and “An Account of the Proceedings of Isaac Bickerstaff, Esq.”

⁴ Franklin, Writings, ii, 202.

⁵ Swift, Satires, pp. 190–191.

⁶ Ibid., p. 185.

⁷ Franklin, Writings, ii, 203–204.

⁸ Swift, Satires, p. 189.

⁹ Franklin, Writings, ii, 204–205.

¹⁰ Swift, Satires, p. 188.

¹¹ Franklin, Writings, ii, 204.

¹² Swift, Satires, p. 188.

¹³ Franklin, Writings, ii, 205.

¹⁴ Thus Franklin reverted to the old hoax in 1739, when Leeds really did die. Poor Richard for 1740 prints a complimentary letter to Richard from the ghost of Leeds, who, for good measure, adds three prophecies, one of which forecasts that “J. J—n, Philomat, shall be openly reconciled to the church of Rome” (Writings, ii, 223). Here is another prophecy at the expense of a brother philomath, and here again an echo from Swift, who enlivened his account of Partridge's death by saying that the astrologer “declar'd himself a Nonconformist, and had a Fanatick Preacher” (Swift, Satires, p. 174). The religion had to be changed to suit the Philadelphia climate, but the basic libel was the same.

¹⁵ J. B. McMaster, Benjamin Franklin, p. 101; Ford's Introduction to Sayings, p. 9; Carl Van Doren's Introduction to Franklin and Edwards (New York, 1920), p. xx.

¹⁶ W. B. Cairns, American Literature, rev. ed. (New York, 1930), p. 95.

¹⁷ Van Doren, op. cit., p. xx.

¹⁸ Faÿ, op. cit., pp. 160, 168.

¹⁹ Swift, Satires, pp. 161, 171.

²⁰ Ibid., p. 174.

²¹ Franklin, Writings, ii, 196.

²² Ibid., I, 342.

²³ Ibid., ii, 213.

²⁴ Ibid., i, 342.

²⁵ Cf. “Prefaces” for 1733, 1737, 1739, 1750.

²⁶ In the body of the almanac for the first six years, I find only one touch suggestive of Richard, the character: the verses for December, 1734, are said to be “by Mrs. Bridget Saunders, my Dutchess, in answer to the December verses of last year.” But both sets of verses (Ford, Sayings of Poor Richard, pp. 31–32, 43) are impersonal: six lines each on a bad wife and a bad husband, neither identifiable as Richard or Bridget. The name Richard, or Dick, occurs in such impersonal lines as

wherein lame is scarcely to be regarded as additional information about Richard Saunders, but as a rhyme-word. More than this, the names, even, appear rarely in the body of the almanac (for these six years)—Bridget's once, and Richard's four or five times.

²⁷ Franklin, Writings, ii, 217.

²⁸ See also the preface for 1743 (impersonal directions for making wine) and that for 1748 (largely made up of extracts concerning the winter season in the Hudson's Bay country).

³⁰ Walter Blair, Native American Humor (New York, 1937), pp. 113–115.

³¹ Ibid., p. 18.

³² Cairns, op. cit., p. 95.

³³ Faÿ, op. cit., p. 162.