Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T16:37:31.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Science and the History of Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Andrew Elfenbein
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Cognitive psychologists studying the reading process have developed a detailed conceptual vocabulary for describing the microprocesses of reading. Modified for the purposes of literary criticism, this vocabulary provides a framework that has been missing from most literary-critical investigations of the history of literate practice. Such concepts as the production of a coherent memory representation, the limitations of working memory span, the relation between online and offline reading processes, the landscape model of comprehension, and the presence of standards of coherence allow for close attention to general patterns in reading and to the ways that individual readers modify them. The interpretation of Victorian responses to the poetry of Robert Browning provides a case study in the adaptation of cognitive models to the history of reading. Such an adaptation can reveal not only reading strategies used by historical readers but also those fostered by the discipline of literary criticism. (AE)

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 121 , Issue 2 , March 2006, pp. 484 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

References

Works Cited

Albrecht, Jason E., and Edward J. O'Brien. “Updating a Mental Model: Maintaining Both Local and Global Coherence.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (1993): 1061–70.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Isobel. Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics, and Politics. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Augst, Thomas. The Clerk's Tale: Young Men and Moral Life in Nineteenth-Century America. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Holquist, Michael. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “From Work to Text.” Image-Music-Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. New York: Hill, 1988. 155–64.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. “Reading.” The Space of Literature. Trans. Ann Smock. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1982. 191–97.Google Scholar
Bortolussi, Marisa, and Dixon, Peter. Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. New York: Cambridge UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Brake, Laurel. “Literary Criticism and the Victorian Periodicals.” Yearbook of English Studies 16 (1986): 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Deborah. Literacy in American Lives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantlinger, Patrick. The Reading Lesson: The Threat of Mass Literacy in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Brewer, Kenneth. “Lost in a Book: Aesthetic Absorption 1820–1880.” Diss. Stanford U, 1998.Google Scholar
Brimley, George. Rev. of Men and Women. Fraser's 53 (1856): 105–16.Google Scholar
Brimley, George. “Tennyson's Poems.” 1855. Essays by George Brim-ley. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 1882. 1–91.Google Scholar
Budd, Desiree, Whitney, Paul, and Turley, Kandi Jo. “Individual Differences in Working Memory Strategies for Reading Expository Texts.” Memory and Cognition 23 (1995): 735–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, Nicolas. “Predictive Inferences Are Represented as Hypothetical Facts.” Journal of Memory and Language 50 (2004): 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, David, and Waters, Gloria. “Verbal Working Memory and Sentence Comprehension.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999): 77–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavallo, Gugliemo, and Chartier, Roger, eds. A History of Reading in the West. Trans. Lydia G. Cochrane. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1999.Google Scholar
Clark, William George. “Preface.” Essays by George Brim-ley. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 1882. vi-x.Google Scholar
Cleghorn, Thomas. “Writings of Charles Dickens.” North British Review 3 (1845): 65–87.Google Scholar
Cramer, Maurice Browning. “Browning's Literary Reputation at Oxford, 1855–1859.” PMLA 57 (1942): 232–40.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas, and Richardson, Alan. “Literary Studies and Cognitive Science: Toward a New Inter-disciplinarity.” Mosaic 32 (1999): 123–40.Google Scholar
Cupchik, Gerald C., et al. “The Landscape of Emotion in Literary Encounters.” Cognition and Emotion 12 (1998): 825–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth, and Patricia, A. Carpenter. “Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (1980): 450–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Barbara J. “London Quarterly and Holborn Review.” Sullivan 3: 203–09.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, Howard, and Cohen, Neal J. From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection: Memory Systems of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch. 1871–72. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982.Google Scholar
Engle, Randall W. “Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 (2002): 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret W. Dido's Daughters: Literacy, Gender, and Empire in Early Modern England and France. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Charles R., John E. Hummel, and Chad J. Mar-solek. “Causality and the Allocation of Attention during Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 (1990): 233–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Freund, Elizabeth. The Return of the Reader: Reader-Response Criticism. London: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Garner, Ruth. Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood: Ablex, 1987.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, and Kaschak, Michael P. “Neuroimaging Studies of Language Production and Comprehension.” Annual Review of Psychology 54 (2003): 91–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerrig, Richard J. Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven: Yale UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Gerrig, Richard J., and Rapp, David N. “Psychological Processes Underlying Literary Impact.” Poetics Today 25 (2004): 265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Pamela. “Ingestion, Contagion, Seduction: Victorian Metaphors of Reading.” Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory 8 (1997): 83–104.Google Scholar
Goldman, Susan R., and Saul, Elizabeth U. “Flexibility in Text Processing: A Strategy Competition Model.” Learning and Individual Differences 2 (1990): 181–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C., Keith K. Millis, and Zwaan, Rolf A. “Discourse Comprehension.” Annual Review of Psychology 48 (1997): 163–89.Google Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C., Murray Singer, and Trabasso, Tom. “Constructing Inferences during Narrative Text Comprehension.” Psychological Review 101 (1994): 371–95.Google Scholar
Green, Melanie C., and Brock, Timothy C. “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2000): 701–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, Craig A., and Schneider, Ralf. “From Iser to Turner and Beyond: Reception Theory Meets Cognitive Criticism.” Style 36 (2002): 640–62.Google Scholar
Harker, W. John. “Information Processing and the Reading of Literary Texts.” New Literary History 20 (1989): 465–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT P, 1995.Google Scholar
Ireland, Alexander, Mrs, . “On ‘A Toccata of Galuppi's.‘” Browning Studies, Being Select Papers by Members of the Browning Society. Ed. Berdoe, Edward. New York: Macmillan, 1895. 187–94.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Just, Marcel Adam, and Patricia, A. Carpenter. “A Capacity Theory of Comprehension: Individual Differences in Working Memory.” Psychological Review 99 (1992): 122–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, Walter. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter, and Teun, A. van Dijk. “Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production.” Psychological Review 85 (1978): 363–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbaum, Robert. The Poetry of Experience: The Dramatic Monologue in Modern Literary Tradition. New York: Norton, 1957.Google Scholar
Latané, David E. Jr. Browning's Sordello and the Aesthetics of Difficulty. Victoria: U of Victoria, 1987.Google Scholar
Leighton, Angela. “Touching Forms: Tennyson and Aestheticism.” Essays in Criticism 52 (2002): 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderholm, Tracy, Virtue, Sandra, Tzeng, Yuhtsuen, and Broek, Paul van den. “Fluctuations in the Availability of Information during Reading: Capturing Cognitive Processes Using the Landscape Model.” Discourse Processes 37 (2004): 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, Robert F., Jr., Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch, and Klusewitz, Madeline A. “College Students' Conditional Knowledge about Reading.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (1993): 292–52.Google Scholar
Martin, Loy D. Browning's Dramatic Monologues and the Post-Romantic Subject. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Maynard, John. “Reading the Reader in Robert Browning's Dramatic Monologues.” Critical Essays on Robert Browning. Ed. Mary Ellis Gibson. New York: 1992. 69–78.Google Scholar
Mays, Kelly J. “The Disease of Reading and Victorian Periodicals.” Literature in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century British Publishing and Reading Practices. Ed. Jordan, John O. and Patten, Robert L. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995. 165–94.Google Scholar
McNicoll, Thomas. “New Poetry.” London Quarterly Review 6 (1856): 493–507.Google Scholar
Morris, William. “Men and Women by Robert Browning.” 1856. The Hollow Land and Other Contributions to the Oxford and Cambridge Magazine. Ed. LeMire, Eugene D. The William Morris Lib. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1996. 259–88.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Edward J., Anne E. Cook, and Peracchi, Kelly A. “Updating Situation Models: A Reply to Zwaan and Madden (2004).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004): 289–91.Google Scholar
Margaret, Oliphant. The Autobiography of Mrs. Oliphant. 1899. Ed. Elisabeth Jay. Peterborough: Broadview, 2002.Google Scholar
Margaret, Oliphant. “Modern Light Literature—Poetry.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 79 (1856): 125–38.Google Scholar
Perfetti, Charles A., and Bolger, Donald J. “The Brain Might Read That Way.” Scientific Studies of Reading 83 (2004): 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressley, Michael, and Afflerbach, Paul. Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1995.Google Scholar
Preyer, Robert O. “The Romantic Tide Reaches Trinity: Notes on the Transmission and Diffusion of New Approaches to Traditional Studies at Cambridge, 18201840.” Victorian Science and Victorian Values: Literary Perspectives. Ed. Paradis, James and Postlewait, Thomas. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1985. 39–68.Google Scholar
Price, Leah. “Reading: The State of the Discipline.” Book History 7 (2004): 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, I.A. Principles of Literary Criticism. 1924. London: Routledge, 1967.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Ed. and trans. Thompson, John B. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Jonathan. The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes. New Haven: Yale UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Rubin, David C. Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-Out Rhymes. New York: Oxford UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Ralf, Schneider. “Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literary Character: The Dynamics of Mental-Model Construction.” Style 35 (2001): 607–42.Google Scholar
Singer, Murray, and Ritchot, Kathryn F.M. “The Role of Working Memory Capacity and Knowledge Access in Text Inference Processing.” Memory and Cognition 24 (1996): 733–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Slinn, E. Warwick. Victorian Poetry as Cultural Critique: The Politics of Performative Language. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2003.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, Peter. “If Meaning Is Constructed, What Is It Made From? Toward a Cultural Theory of Reading.” Review of Educational Research 71 (2001): 133–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, Ellen. Gaps in Nature: Literary Interpretation and the Modular Mind. Albany: State U of New York P, 1993.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Meir. “Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes.” Poetics Today 24 (2003): 297–395, 517–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, Brian. “What's ‘New’ in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice.” Current Issues in Comparative Education 5.2 (2003). 23 Nov. 2005 <http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/articles/bs152.htm>.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alvin, ed. British Literary Magazines. 4 vols. Westport: Greenwood, 1983–86.Google Scholar
Tom, Trabasso, and Broek, Paul van den. “Causal Relatedness and Importance of Story Events.” Journal of Memory and Language 24 (1985): 595–611.Google Scholar
Tucker, Herbert F. “Dramatic Monologue and the Overhearing of Lyric.” Critical Essays on Robert Browning. Ed. Gibson, Mary Ellis. New York: Hall, 1992. 21–36.Google Scholar
van den Broek, Paul. “The Causal Inference Maker: Towards a Process Model of Inference Generation in Text Comprehension.” Comprehension Processes in Reading. Ed. Balota, D.A., Flores d'Arcais, G.B., and Rayner, K. New York: Erlbaum, 1990. 423–46.Google Scholar
van den Broek, Paul, and Gustafson, Mary. “Comprehension and Memory for Texts: Three Generations of Reading Research.” Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence. Ed. Goldman, Sue R., Graesser, Arthur C., and Broek, van den. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1999. 15–34.Google Scholar
van den Broek, Paul, and Kremer, Kathleen E. “The Mind in Action: What It Means to Comprehend during Reading.” Reading for Meaning. Ed. Taylor, B., Graves, M., and Broek, van den. New York: Teachers Coll., 1999. 1–31.Google Scholar
van den Broek, Paul, Robert F. Lorch Jr., Tracy Linderholm, and Mary Gustafson. “The Effects of Readers' Goals on Inference Generation and Memory for Texts.” Memory and Cognition 29 (2001): 1081–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Broek, Paul, Rapp, David N., and Kendeou, Panayiota. “Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension.” Discourse Processes 39 (2005): 299–316.Google Scholar
van den Broek, Paul, Young, Michael, Tzeng, Yuhtsuen, and Linderholm, Tracy. “The Landscape Model of Reading: Inferences and the Online Construction of a Memory Representation.” The Construction of Mental Representations during Reading. Ed. Goldman, Susan R. and Oostendorp, Herre van. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1999. 71–98.Google Scholar
Vann, J. Don. “Fraser's Magazine.” Sullivan 3: 171–75.Google Scholar
Wagner-Lawlor, Jennifer A. “The Pragmatics of Silence, and the Figuration of the Reader in Browning's Dramatic Monologues.” Victorian Poetry 35 (1997): 287–302.Google Scholar
Wallins, Roger P. “Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine.” Sullivan. 2: 45–53.Google Scholar
Woolford, John. “Periodicals and the Practice of Literary Criticism, 1855–64.” The Victorian Periodical Press: Samplings and Soundings. Ed. Shattock, Joanne and Wolff, Michael. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1982. 109–42.Google Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A. Aspects of Literary Comprehension: A Cognitive Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A., Mark C. Langston, and Graesser, Arthur C. “The Construction of Situation Models in Narrative Comprehension: An Event-Indexing Model.” Psychological Science 6 (1995): 292–97.Google Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A., and Madden, Carol J. “Updating Situation Models.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004): 283–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, Rolf A., Joseph P. Magliano, and Graesser, Arthur C. “Dimensions of Situation Model Construction in Narrative Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995): 386–97.Google Scholar