Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T09:25:53.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Studies and Close Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Angus Connell Brown
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Why did it take so long to start writing the history of close reading? For the best part of a century, close reading has grounded literary studies in the university, structuring assessment, teaching, employment, and publication. A basic proficiency in close reading has long been a professional obligation for faculty members and a course requirement for students. It makes sense, then, that Caroline Levine's Forms begins with a description of our method in action. A reader is settling down to work with a copy of Jane Eyre. She has a lengthy education behind her and a wealth of interpretive techniques for the book in front of her. Still, one thing is certain: our critic will broach the forms of the novel by drawing from “close reading methods” while using “historical research methods to analyze sociopolitical experience.” “But,” Caroline Levine asks, “would our critic be right to distinguish between the formal and the social?” (1).

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 132 , Issue 5 , October 2017, pp. 1187 - 1193
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 The Modern Language Association of America

References

Works Cited

Anker, Elizabeth S., and Felski, Rita. Introduction. Critique and Postcritique, edited by Anker, and Felski, , Duke UP, 2017, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris. The Social Mission of English Criticism, 1848–1932. 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Best, Stephen, and Marcus, Sharon. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations, vol. 108, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Stephen, et al. “Building a Better Description.” Representations, vol. 136, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Buurma, Rachel, and Heffernan, Laura. “The Common Reader and the Archival Classroom: Disciplinary History for the Twenty-First Century.” New Literary History, vol. 43, no. 1, Winter 2012, pp. 113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. “The Closeness of Close Reading.” ADE Bulletin, vol. 149, 2010, pp. 20–25, doi: 10.1632/ade .149.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dames, Nicholas. The Physiology of the Novel: Reading, Neural Science, and the Form of Victorian Fiction. Oxford UP, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Andrew, and Lentricchia, Frank, editors. Close Reading: The Reader Duke UP, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Empson, William. “Answers to Comments.” Essays in Criticism, vol. 3, no. 1, Jan. 1953, pp. 114–20.Google Scholar
Empson, William. Argufying: Essays on Literature and Culture. edited by Haffenden, John, Chatto and Windus, 1987.Google Scholar
Empson, William. Seven Types of Ambiguity. Chatto and Windus, 1930.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. U of Chicago P, 2015. Gallop, Jane. “Close Reading in 2009.” ADE Bulletin, vol. 149, 2010, pp. 15–19, doi:10.1632/ade.149.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Deaths of the Author: Reading and Writing in Time. Duke UP, 2011.Google Scholar
Gang, Joshua. “Behaviourism and the Beginnings of Close Reading.” English Literary History, vol. 78, no. 1, Spring 2011, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillory, John. “Close Reading: Prologue and Epilogue.” ADE Bulletin, vol. 149, 2010, pp. 8–14, doi:10.1632/ade .149.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. U of Chicago P, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “Encoding/Decoding.” Culture, Media, Language, edited by Hall, et al., Hutchinson / Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, 1980, pp. 15–47.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “The Formation of a Diasporic Individual: An Interview with Stuart Hall by Kuan-Hsing Chen.” Morley and Chen, pp. 486–505.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “Marx's Notes on Method: A ‘Reading’ of the ‘1857 Introduction.‘” Cultural Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, 2003, pp. 113–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “New Ethnicities.” Morley and Chen, pp. 442–51.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “Subjects in History: The Making of a DiasporicGoogle Scholar
Individual.“ The House That Race Built: Original Essays by Toni Morrison, Angela Y. Davis, Cornel West, and Others on Black Americans and Politics in America Today, edited by Lubiano, Wahneema, Pantheon Books, 1997, pp. 289–300.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, et al. Policing the Crisis. Macmillan Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart, et al. The Popular Arts. 1964. Duke UP, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hancher, Michael. “Re: Search and Close Reading.” Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, edited by Gold, Matthew K. and Klein, Lauren F., U of Minnesota P, 2016, pp. 118–39.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. A Companion to Marx's Capital. Verso, 2010.Google Scholar
Jackson, Virginia. Dickinson's Misery: A Theory of Lyric Reading. Princeton UP, 2005.Google Scholar
James, David, editor. Modernism and Close Reading. Oxford UP, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Leavis, F.R., editor. A Selection from Scrutiny. vol. 2, Cambridge UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph M. The Battle of the Books: History and Literature in the Augustan Age. Cornell UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Love, Heather. “Close but Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn.” New Literary History, vol. 41, no. 2, 2010, pp. 371–91.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital. Translated by Ben Fowkes, vol. 1, Penguin Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Miller, D.A. Hidden Hitchcock. U of Chicago P, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D.A. Jane Austen; or, The Secret of Style. Princeton UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading. Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Morgan, Benjamin. “Critical Empathy: Vernon Lee's Aesthetics and the Origins of Close Reading.” Victorian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Social, Political, and Cultural Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, 2012, pp. 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, David, and Chen, Kuan-Hsing, editors. Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
North, Joseph. Literary Criticism: A Concise Political History. Harvard UP, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jessica. Digital Modernism: Making It New in New Media. Oxford UP, 2013.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Translated by Savage, Dennis, Yale UP, 1970.Google Scholar
Serpell, C. Namwali. Seven Modes of Uncertainty. Harvard UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Thaventhiran, Helen. Radical Empiricists: Five Modernist Close Readers. Oxford UP, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society, 1780–1850. Columbia UP, 1958.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Fontana Paperbacks, 1976.Google Scholar