Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T14:31:13.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dulness Unbound: Rhetoric and Pope's Dunciad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Fredric V. Bogel
Fredric V. Bogel*
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has long been recognized that the American formalists' rehabilitation of Alexander Pope depended on a renewed interest in rhetoric. In fact, there is a remarkable structural congruence between the formalists image of Pope's poetry and their conception of rhetoric, for both are item-centered, combinatory, and ultimately unifying. A single model of unified diversity, then, governs not only the formalist image of Pope's couplet rhetoric and theodicean scheme but formalist conceptions of rhetoric and “organic form” as well. An alternative (and complementary) model of rhetoric, however, insisting on creation as an act of structuring through differentiation rather than through unification, can help us to a fuller understanding of The Dunciad, and especially of the place of Dulness in that poem. Such a model can also generate a poetics capable of granting to satire and mock forms an appropriately primary status. (FVB)

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 97 , Issue 5 , October 1982 , pp. 844 - 855
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Trans. Miller, Richard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1974.Google Scholar
Cohen, Murray. “Versions of the Lock: Readers of The Rape of the Lock.” ELH 43(1976): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, John. Critical Works of John Dennis. Ed. Hooker, E. N. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1939. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas R. This Dark Estate: A Reading of Pope. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Empson, William. The Structure of Complex Words. London: Chatto and Windus, 1951.Google Scholar
Erskine-Hill, H. H. “The ‘New World’ of Pope's Dunciad.” In Essential Articles for the Study of Alexander Pope. Ed. Mack, Maynard. Rev. and enl. ed. Hamden, Ct.: Archon, 1968, 803–24.Google Scholar
Griffin, Dustin. Alexander Pope: The Poet in the Poems. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey. “The Voice of the Shuttle: Language from the Point of View of Literature.” In Beyond Formalism. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1970, 337–55.Google Scholar
Jack, Ian. Augustan Satire. Oxford: Clarendon, 1952.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. “Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasie Disturbances.” In Morris Halle and his Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton, 1975, 69–96.Google Scholar
Jones, Emrys. “Pope and Dulness.” In Pope: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Guerinot, J. V. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972, 124–57.Google Scholar
Mack, Maynard. “Wit and Poetry and Pope: Some Observations on His Imagery.” In Pope and His Contemporaries. Ed. Clifford, James L. and Landa, Louis A. Oxford: Clarendon, 1949, 20–40.Google Scholar
Paulson, Ronald. “Satire, and Poetry, and Pope.” In English Satire. Los Angeles: Clark Memorial Library, 1972, 57–102.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. Poetry and Prose of Alexander Pope. Ed. Williams, Aubrey. Boston: Houghton, 1969.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. The Prose Works of Alexander Pope, 1711–1720. Ed. Ault, Norman. Oxford: Blackwell, 1936.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. The Twickenham Edition of the Works of Alexander Pope. Ed. Butt, John et al. Vol. 1: Pastoral Poetry and An Essay on Criticism. Ed. Williams, E. Audra and Williams, Aubrey. London: Methuen; New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1961. Vol. 5: The Dunciad. Ed. James Sutherland. 2nd rev. ed. London: Methuen; New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. The Works of Alexander Pope. Ed. W. Elwin and W. J. Courthope. Vol. 10. London, 1886.Google Scholar
Price, Martin. To the Palace of Wisdom: Studies in Order and Energy from Dryden to Blake. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1964.Google Scholar
Price, Martin., ed. The Restoration and Eighteenth Century. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. The Arte of English Poésie. Ed. Willcock, Gladys D. and Walker, Alice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Rawson, C. J. “Order and Cruelty: A Reading of Swift (with Some Comments on Pope and Johnson).” Essays in Criticism 20(1970): 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Pat. “The Name and Nature of Dulness: Proper Nouns in The Dunciad.” Anglia 92(1974): 79–112.Google Scholar
Seidel, Michael. Satiric Inheritance, Rabelais to Sterne. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Sewell, Elizabeth. The Human Metaphor. Notre Dame, Ind.: Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Sitter, John E. The Poetry of Pope's Dunciad. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. An Argument of Images: The Poetry of Alexander Pope. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Tanner, Tony. “Reason and the Grotesque: Pope's Dunciad” Critical Quarterly 7(1965): 145–60.Google Scholar
Williams, Aubrey L. Pope's Dunciad: A Study of Its Meaning. London: Methuen, 1955.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. “Rhetoric and Poems: Alexander Pope” and “One Relation of Rhyme to Reason.” In his The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. New York: Noonday, 1954, 153–85.Google Scholar