Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:50:42.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

For a Poetics of Verse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Simon Jarvis
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Reader! No time for pleasantries.

The study of poetry is still obstructed and dominated by the unsolved question as to what poetry is. Most have concluded that it is unproductive to try to answer this question too quickly or even, perhaps, to ask it. This creates a block. Where terms such as poetry, lyric, and form remain academically current, they may do so as a kind of revered but disbelieved magic. Lyric suffers from some of the same difficulties as poetry (Culler; Prins; Terada). These difficulties go further than those attending any indistinct yet prevalent cultural concept. They concern also the long “war embrace” between poetry and philosophy, an antagonistic cooperation (Coleridge 191).

Information

Type
Thinking the Future
Information
PMLA , Volume 125 , Issue 4: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century , October 2010, pp. 931 - 935
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

References

Works Cited

Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: Continuum, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. “Parataxis: On Hölderlin's Late Poetry.” Notes to Literature. Vol. 2. Trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia UP, 1992. 109–49. Print. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Derek, Attridge. “Poetry Unbound? Observations on Free Verse.” Proceedings of the British Academy 73 (1987): 353–73. Print.Google Scholar
Derek, Attridge. The Rhythms of English Poetry. London: Longman, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Roland, Barthes. “Le plaisir du texte.” Œuvres complètes. Vol. 4. Paris: Seuil, 2002. 219–61. Print. 5 vols.Google Scholar
Blasing, Mutlu Konuk. Lyric Poetry: The Pain and the Pleasure of Words. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Richard, Bradford. Augustan Measures: Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Writings on Prosody and Metre. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria. Ed. Leask, Nigel. London: Everyman, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
John, Creaser. “‘Service Is Perfect Freedom’: Paradox and Prosodic Style in Paradise Lost.” Review of English Studies 58 (2007): 268–315. Print.Google Scholar
John, Creaser. “‘Through Mazes Running’: Rhythmic Verve in Milton's ‘L'Allegro’ and ‘Il Penseroso.‘” Review of English Studies 52 (2001): 376–410. Print.Google Scholar
Jonathan, Culler. “Why Lyric?” PMLA 123.1 (2008): 201–06. Print.Google Scholar
Eric, Griffiths. The Printed Voice of Victorian Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Groves, Peter L. Strange Music: The Meter of the English Heroic Line. Victoria: U of Victoria, 1998. Print. Eng. Lit. Studies Monograph Ser. 74.Google Scholar
Simon, Jarvis. “The Melodics of Long Poems.” Textual Practice 24.4 (2010): 607–22. Print.Google Scholar
Simon, Jarvis. “Unfree Verse: On John Wilkinson's The Speaking Twins.” Rhythm in Literature after the Crisis of Verse. Ed. Peter Dayan and David Evans. Spec. issue of Paragraph 33.2 (2010): 280–95. Print.Google Scholar
Simon, Jarvis. “What Does Art Know?” Aesthetics and the Work of Art. Ed. Bolla, Peter De and Uhlig, Stefan H. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2009. 57–70. Print.Google Scholar
Simon, Jarvis. Wordsworth's Philosophic Song. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Michaels, Walter Benn. The Shape of the Signifier: 1967 to the End of History. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Yopie, Prins. “Historical Poetics, Dysprosody, and The Science of English Verse.” PMLA 123.1 (2008): 229–34. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Roubaud. La vieillesse d'Alexandre: Essai sur quelques états récents du vers français. Paris: Maspero, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
Scherr, Barry P. Russian Poetry: Meter, Rhythm, and Rhyme. Berkeley: U of California P, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Clive, Scott. The Poetics of French Verse: Studies in Reading. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Clive, Scott. The Riches of Rhyme: Studies in French Verse. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Clive, Scott. Vers Libre: The Emergence of Free Verse in France, 1886–1914. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Garrett, Stewart. Reading Voices: Literature and the Phonotext. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Susan, Stewart. “Lyric Possession.” Critical Inquiry 22.1 (1995): 34–63. Print.Google Scholar
Sugimura, N. K. “Matter of Glorious Trial”: Spiritual and Material Substance in Paradise Lost. New Haven: Yale UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Marina, Tarlinskaia. English Verse: Theory and History. The Hague: Mouton, 1976. Print. De Proprietatibus Litterarum, Series Practica 117.Google Scholar
Rei, Terada. “After the Critique of Lyric.” PMLA 123.1 (2008): 195–200. Print.Google Scholar
Gordon, Teskey. Delirious Milton: The Fate of the Poet in Modernity. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Yuri, Tynianov. The Problem of Verse Language. Ed. and trans. Sosa, Michael and Harvey, Brent. Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Veselovskij, A. N. . Ed. V. M. Žirmunskij. Leningrad: Xudožestvennaja, 1940. Print.Google Scholar
Michael, Wachtel. The Development of Russian Verse: Meter and Its Meanings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Donald, Wesling. The Scissors of Meter: Grammetrics and Reading. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
John, Wilkinson. The Lyric Touch: Essays on the Poetry of Excess. Great Wilbraham: Salt, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Wright, George T. Shakespeare's Metrical Art. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žirmunskij, V. M. Ed. Dmitrij Tschižewski. München: Fink, 1970. Print. Slavische Propyläen: Texte in Neu- und Nachdrucken 71.Google Scholar