No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
From Animal to Animality Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
When Jack London's human characters interact with dogs and wolves in texts such as the call of the wild (1903) and White Fang (1906), erotic fireworks often light up the wild. The love between the dog Buck and his human partner, John Thornton, in The Call of the Wild is characterized as “[l]ove, genuine passionate love. … love that was feverish and burning, that was adoration, that was madness” (59–60). In White Fang, the half wolf of the title experiences a love for Weedon Scott that “manifested itself to [White Fang] as a void in his being—a hungry, aching, yearning void that clamored to be filled. It was a pain and an unrest; and it received easement only by the touch of the new god's presence” (244). Instead of reading these passionate nonhuman characters as “real” animals, literary and cultural critics often read them as “men in furs,” in Mark Seltzer's memorable phrase, leading to interesting and important discussions of, for example, homoerotic interactions between men.
Information
- Type
- Theories and Methodologies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009
References
Works Cited
“About ICAS.” Critical Animal Studies. Inst. for Critical Animal Studies, n.d. Web. 13 Aug. 2008.Google Scholar
Rachel, Adams. Sideshow U.S.A.: Freaks and the American Cultural Imagination. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Bruce, Bagemihl. Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity. New York: St. Martin's, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Gillian, Beer. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Bert, Bender. Evolution and “the Sex Problem”: American Narratives during the Eclipse of Darwinism. Kent: Kent State UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Bradford, Phillips Verner, and Blume, Harvey. Ota Benga: The Pygmy in the Zoo. New York: St. Martin's, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
George, Chauncey. Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Makings of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940. New York: Basic, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Midas, Dekkers. Dearest Pet: On Bestiality. 1992. Trans. Paul Vincent. London: Verso, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Scott, Derrick. “Making a Heterosexual Man: Gender, Sexuality, and Narrative in the Fiction of Jack London.” Rereading Jack London. Ed. Cassuto, Leonard and Reesman, Jeanne Campbell. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1996. 110–29. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. “The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow).” Trans. David Wills. Critical Inquiry 28.2 (2002): 369–418. Print.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. An Introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon, 1978. Print. Vol. 1 of The History of Sexuality.Google Scholar
Sigmund, Freud. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. 24 vols. London: Hogarth, 1953–75. Print.Google Scholar
Hale, Nathan G. Freud and the Americans: The Beginnings of Psychoanalysis in the United States, 1876–1917. New York: Oxford UP, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
H-Animal Discussion Network. “Resources.” H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online. Michigan State U, 1995–2006. Web. 13 Aug. 2008.Google Scholar
Donna, Haraway. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Donna, Haraway. “Teddy Bear Patriarchy: Taxidermy in the Garden of Eden, New York City, 1908–1936.” Cultures of United States Imperialism. Ed. Kaplan, Amy and Pease, Donald E. Durham: Duke UP, 1993. 237–91. Print.Google Scholar
Heise, Ursula K. “The Hitchhiker's Guide to Ecocriticism.” PMLA 121.2 (2006): 503–16. Print.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Roger N. The Trouble with Nature: Sex in Science and Popular Culture. Berkeley: U of California P, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Edward J. Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion. New York: Basic, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
George, Levine. Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Alphonso, Lingis. “Animal Body, Inhuman Face.” Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal. 1998. Ed. Wolfe, Cary. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2003. 165–82. Print.Google Scholar
Michael, Lundblad. “Epistemology of the Jungle: Progressive-Era Sexuality and the Nature of the Beast.” American Literature, forthcoming. Print.Google Scholar
Saul, Rosenzweig. The Historic Expedition to America (1909): Freud, Jung, and Hall the King-Maker, with G. Stanley Hall as Host and William James as Guest. 2nd, rev. ed. Saint Louis: Rana, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Andrew, Ross. The Chicago Gangster Theory of Life: Nature's Debt to Society. London: Verso, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Joan, Roughgarden. Evolution's Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People. Berkeley: U of California P, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Jennifer, Terry. “‘Unnatural Acts’ in Nature: The Scientific Fascination with Queer Animals.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 6.2 (2000): 151–93. Print.Google Scholar
Cary, Wolfe. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Marlene, Zuk. Sexual Selections: What We Can and Can't Learn about Sex from Animals. Berkeley: U of California P, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 15
- Cited by