Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:21:42.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to “Aurality and Literacy”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Christopher Cannon  and
Matthew Rubery
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 135 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 350 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Christopher Cannon and Matthew Rubery

References

Works Cited

Alderson-Day, Ben, et al. “Uncharted Features and Dynamics of Reading: Voices, Characters, and Crossing of Experiences.” Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 49, Mar. 2017, pp. 98–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bede, . Ecclesiastical History of the English People. edited by Colgrave, Bertram and Mynors, R. A. B., Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Theodora. Henry James at Work. edited by Powers, Lyall H., U of Michigan P, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymn, Cædmon's. The Manuscripts of Cædmon's Hymn and Bede's Death Song, with a Critical Text of the Epistola Cuthberti de obitu Bedae, edited by Elliott Van Kirk Dobbie, Columbia UP, 1937, pp. 10–48. Columbia University Studies in English and Comparative Literature 128.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. The Kiss of Lamourette: Reflections in Cultural History. W. W. Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
Gatz. Elevator Repair Service, www.elevator.org/shows/gatz/.Google Scholar
Havelock, Eric. “The Oral-Literate Equation: A Formula for the Modern Mind.” Literacy and Orality, edited by Olson, David R. and Torrance, Nancy, Cambridge UP, 1991, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
The Holy Bible: Douay Version. Catholic Truth Society, 1956.Google Scholar
Kelber, Werner H. The Oral and the Written Gospel: The Hermeneutics of Speaking and Writing in the Synoptic Tradition, Mark, Paul, and Q. 1983. Indiana UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich A. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated by Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey and Wutz, Michael, Stanford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
“Listening Is the New Reading.” Advertisement. Audible, 25 Feb. 2018, www.audible.com/ep/tmo.Google Scholar
Lord, Albert B. The Singer of Tales. Atheneum, 1960.Google Scholar
McDowell, Paula. The Invention of the Oral: Print Commerce and Fugitive Voices in Eighteenth-Century Britain. U of Chicago P, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. “The Future of the Book.” Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews, edited by McLuhan, Stephanie and Staines, David, McClelland and Stewart, 2003, pp. 173–86.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, Katherine O'Brien. Visible Song: Transitional Literacy in Old English Verse. Cambridge UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Routledge, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J. “Oral Residue in Tudor Prose Style.” PMLA, Vol. 80, No. 3, June 1965, pp. 145–54.Google Scholar
Powers, Richard. “How to Speak a Book.” The New York Times, 7 Jan. 2007, www.nytimes.com/2007/01/07/books/review/Powers2.t.html.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. “Literature, Oral-Aural and Optical.” Complementarities: Uncollected Essays, edited by Russo, John Paul, Harvard UP, 1976, pp. 201–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rilke, Rainer Maria. Duino Elegies. Translated by Young, David, W. W. Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Stock, Brian. Listening for the Text: On the Uses of the Past. Johns Hopkins UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Waugh, Patricia. “The Novelist as Voice Hearer.” Lancet, Vol. 386, 5 Dec. 2015, pp. e54–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar