Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T22:32:30.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lamentations of Don Juan and Macbeth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Edmund J. Goehring
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In 1772, Gottlieb Stephanie introduced an adaptation of Macbeth to replace a banned Viennese Don Juan scenario. This essay uses Stephanie's “new stone guest” to uncover broader historical and thematic connections between Macbeth and Don Juan literature. Both tales have roots in anti-Machiavellian theater, which describes the psychic wreckage brought about when one suppresses the conscience in attempting to subdue fortune. Stephanie expresses this shared vision most vividly by folding a lamento into his tragedy. A closing lamentation delivered from hell was a fixture in Don Juan lore, and modern scholarship tends to interpret it as a carnivalesque defiance of temporal and divine stricture. Stephanie, however, draws on a different treatment of the episode: the protagonist's plaint represents a quest for immortality that has turned into a desire for annihilation. Instead of offering defiance, Stephanie's Macbeth follows the course of many Don Juans in despairing over the possibility of grace.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 120 , Issue 5 , October 2005, pp. 1524 - 1542
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2005

References

Works Cited

Bertati, Giovanni. Don Giovanni o sia Il convitato di pietra. Venice: Casali, 1787.Google Scholar
Biblia sacra. Vulgatae editionis, editio nova. London: n.p., 1857.Google Scholar
Buchanan, George. The History of Scotland. London: Jones, 1690.Google Scholar
[Cerlone, Francesco]. Il nuovo convitato di pietra. Bologna: n.p., 1789.Google Scholar
Il convitato di pietra. [C. 1650]. Macchia 213–29. Ms. Biblioteca Casanatense, Rome.Google Scholar
Cremeri, Cremeri Benedikt Dominikus. Don Juan oder der steinerne Gast. [Vienna]: n.p., 1788.Google Scholar
Da Ponte, Lorenzo. Don Giovanni, ossia Il dissoluto punito. Prague: Di Schoenfeld, 1787.Google Scholar
Goldoni, Carl. Don Giovanni Tenorio ossia Il dissoluto. Venice: n.p., 1736.Google Scholar
Gumpenhuber, Philippe de. “Repertoire de tous les spectacles, qui ont été donné au Theatre de la Ville depuis le 1:er janvier jusqu’ au dernier decembre de l'année 1768.” Ms. Houghton Lib., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Holinshed, Raphael. The Description of Scotland. [London]: n.p., 1585.Google Scholar
Lazzaro-Weis, Carol. “Parody and Farce in the Don Juan Myth in the Eighteenth Century.” Eighteenth-Century Life 8.3 (1983): 35–48.Google Scholar
Macchia, Giovanni. Vita, avventure e morte di Don Giovanni. Piccola Biblioteca Adelphi 267. Milan: Adelphi, 1991.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince. The Prince: A Revised Translation, Backgrounds, Interpretations, Marginalia. Ed. and trans. Adams, RobertMartin. New York: Norton, 1992. 1–75.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Il principe. Opere. Vol. 1. Ed. Corrado Vivanti. Biblioteca della Pléiade 23. Turin: Einaudi, 1997. 119–92.Google Scholar
Marinelli, Karl von. Dom Juan, oder Der steinerne Gast. Vienna: n.p., 1783.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher. Doctor Faustus. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1962.Google Scholar
Mayer, Hans. Doktor Faust und Don Juan. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1979.Google Scholar
Molière. Don Juan, ou Le festin de pierre. Paris: n.p., 1665.Google Scholar
Molina, Tirso de. El burlador de Sevilla y convidado de piedra. 1630. Ed. Juan Manuel Oliver Cabañes. Madrid: Clásicos Libertarias, 2003.Google Scholar
Molina, Tirso de. The Playboy of Seville; or, Supper with a Statue. Trans. Adrienne M. Schizzano and Oscar Mandel. The Theatre of Don Juan. Ed. Mandel, Oscar. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1963. 47–99.Google Scholar
Müller-Kampel, Beatrix. Dämon, Schwärmer, Biedermann: Don Juan in der deutschen Literatur bis 1918. Philologische Studien und Quellen 126. Berlin: Schmidt, 1993.Google Scholar
Porta, Nunziato. Il convitato di pietra, o sia Il dissoluto. Prague: n.p., 1776.Google Scholar
Riebling, Barbara. “Virtue's Sacrifice: A Machiavellian Reading of Macbeth.” SEL 31 (1991): 273–86.Google Scholar
Rommel, Otto. Die Alt-Wiener Volkskomödien: Ihre Geschichte vom barocken Welt-Theater bis zum Tode Nestroys. Vienna: Scholl, 1952.Google Scholar
Rosimond. Le nouveau festin de pierre ou L'athée foudroyé. Paris: R. Guignard, 1670.Google Scholar
Russell, Charles C. The Don Juan Legend before Mozart. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1993.Google Scholar
Sashegyi, Oskar. Zensur und Geistesfreiheit unter Joseph II. Studia Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 16. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1958.Google Scholar
Shadwell, Thomas. The Libertine. London: Herringman, 1676.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Ed. Braunmuller, A. R. New Cambridge Shakespeare. New York: Cambridge UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Das steinerne Gastmahl, oder die redende Statua, samt Arie welche von Hanns=Wurst singet; nebst denen Versen des Eremiten und denen Verzweiflungs-Versen des Don Juans bey dessen unglückseeligen Lebens-Ende. [Vienna]: n.p., [c. 1730].Google Scholar
Stephanie, Gottlieb. Macbeth: Ein Trauerspiel. Stephanies sämmtliche Schauspiele. Vol. 2. Vienna: Ghelen, 1774. 276–360.Google Scholar
Szarota, Elida Maria, and Lang, Franciscus. Das Jesuitendrama im deutschen Sprachgebiet: Eine Periochen-Edition: Texte und Kommentare. Munich: Fink, 1980.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “Don Giovanni as an Idea.” W. A. Mozart: Don Giovanni. By Julian Rushton. New York: Cambridge UP, 1981. 81–91.Google Scholar
Yates, W. E. Theatre in Vienna: A Critical History, 1776–1995. New York: Cambridge UP, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zehentner, Paolo. Promontorium Malae Spei Impiis Periculose Navigantibus Propositum. Graz: Widmanstad, 1643.Google Scholar