Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:53:50.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrative Structure in Maupassant: Frames of Desire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Angela S. Moger
Angela S. Moger*
Affiliation:
Sarah Lawrence College Bronxville, New York
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay explores the dynamics of framed narrative through readings of two Maupassant stories that illustrate the range of potential in the frame. Scrutiny of “La rempailleuse” and “En voyage” reveals, in particular, how a frame modifies the effect of, and reaction to, the narrative it surrounds. The more general principle that emerges is that the seemingly gratuitous border consisting of the “extra” narrator and his addressees operates, paradoxically, against closure, casting the reader into a metacommunicative realm where a second sign system springs from the first. Thus, in “En voyage,” romantic love, the thematic content, serves as the basis for a poetics of narrative and illuminates the larger implications of the interminability of the paratactic structure. Issues addressed are the strategies latent in the frame and the way the form itself calls into question the very nature and function of narrative.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , May 1985, pp. 315 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Paris: Seuil, 1970.Google Scholar
Chklovski, Victor. “La construction de la nouvelle et du roman.” Théorie de la littérature. Ed. Todorov, T. Paris: Seuil, 1965. 170–96.Google Scholar
Crouzet, Michel. “Une rhétorique de Maupassant?” Revue d'histoire littéraire de la France 80 (1980): 233–61.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Self-Consuming Artifacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature. Berkeley: U of California P, 1972.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Figures III. Paris: Seuil, 1972.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1974.Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J. Maupassant: La sémiotique du texte: Exercices pratiques. Paris: Seuil, 1976.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1974.Google Scholar
Lubbock, Percy. The Craft of Fiction. 1921. Rpt. New York: Scribner's, 1955.Google Scholar
Maupassant, Guy de. Contes et nouvelles. Ed. Schmidt, Albert-Marie. Paris: Albin Michel, 1973.Google Scholar
Maupassant, Guy de. Œuvres complètes. Paris: Louis Conard, 1947.Google Scholar
Moger, Angela S. “That Obscure Object of Narrative.” Yale French Studies 63 (1982): 129–38.Google Scholar
Pierrot, Jean. “Espace et mouvement dans les récits de Maupassant.” Flaubert et Maupassant: Ecrivains normands. Ed. Joseph-Marc Bailbé. Paris: PUF, 1981. 167–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Gerald. “Introduction à l'étude du narrataire.” Poétique 14 (1973): 178–96.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald. “Nom et destin dans ‘La parure.‘” French Review 56 (1982): 267–71.Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Poetic Closure: A Study of How Poems End. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1968.Google Scholar
Spoerri, Theophil. “Mérimée and the Short Story.” Yale French Studies 2.2 (1949): 3–11.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. Poétique de la prose. Paris: Seuil, 1971.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo. Guy de Maupassant. Trans. Tcherkoff, U. 1898. London: Haskell, 1974.Google Scholar