Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T05:14:12.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Native Books and the “English Book”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Moradewun Adejunmobi
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Those of us working in the american academy have so internalized the grammar of postcolonial theory that we now take for granted interstices, hybridity, slippage, and liminality, among other terms commonplace in the discourse of postcolonialism. Beyond the terms themselves, we have taken to heart, absorbed, and extended the lessons from Homi K. Bhabha's The Location of Culture. Those lessons furnished a stimulative template for analyzing particular power asymmetries. Nevertheless, scholars have not referred as widely as we might expect to Bhabha's work in general and The Location of Culture in particular, especially in some fields for which postcolonial theory was supposed to be a natural fit, such as African literary studies. The index of African Literature: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, a 764-page compendium assembling many of the most important interventions in African literature from the 1970s to the early twenty-first century, is an instructive example: it lists only three entries for Bhabha (Olaniyan and Quayson). Given that postcolonial theory and African literary studies share an interest and a language (the aftermath of British colonialism and English) in their research agendas, we might also ponder the frequency with which postcolonial theory in the vein of Bhabha, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, and Edward Said has elicited critique from scholars working with African literary texts and in African studies writ large. Individual persuasion is at work in these critiques but so also undoubtedly are positionality and location. We should read the critiques, then, not for their universal resonance, but for an understanding of debates unfolding in specific locations around the world, as well as in relation to the subject positions of individual scholars and their ideological proclivities.

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 132 , Issue 1 , January 2017, pp. 135 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2017

References

Works Cited

Adejunmobi, Moradewun. Vernacular Palaver: Imaginations of the Local and Non-native Languages in West Africa. Multilingual Matters, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajayi-Soyinka, Omofolabo. “Transcending the Boundaries of Power and Imperialism: Writing Gender, Constructing Knowledge.” Female Circumcision and the Politics of Knowledge: African Women in Imperialist Discourses, edited by Nnaemeka, Obioma, Praeger Publishers, 2005, pp. 47–80.Google Scholar
Bandele, Biyi. “Why Can't Nigerians Watch Country's Biggest Movie?” CNN, 21 May 2014, www.cnn.com/2014/05/21/opinion/why-cant-nigerians-half-yellow-sun/.Google Scholar
Barber, Karin, editor and translator. Print Culture and the First Yoruba Novel: I. B. Thomas's Life Story of Me, Segilola and Other Texts. Brill, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Gikandi, Simon. “In the Shadow of Hegel: Cultural Theory in the Age of Displacement.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 27, no. 2, 1996, pp. 139–50.Google Scholar
Kachifo Limited. kachifo.com/home/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2016.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Neil. The Postcolonial Unconscious. Cambridge UP, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lydia. “Script in Motion: Writing as Imperial Technology, Past and Present.” PMLA, vol. 130, no. 2, 2015, pp. 375–83.Google Scholar
Mbembe, Achille. On the Postcolony. Translated by Berrett, A. M. et al., U of California P, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, Anne. “The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term ‘Post-colonialism.‘” Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader, edited by William, Patrick and Chrisman, Laura, Columbia UP, 1994, pp. 291–303.Google Scholar
Mudimbe, V. Y. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. Indiana UP, 2008.Google Scholar
“A New Kind of Romance.” This Day, 7 Apr. 2016, www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2016/04/07/a-new-kind-of-romance/.Google Scholar
Olaniyan, Tejumola. “African Cultural Studies: Of Travels, Accents, and Epistemologies.” Rethinking African Cultural Production, edited by Ekotto, Frieda and Harrow, Kenneth W., Indiana UP, 2015, pp. 94–108.Google Scholar
Olaniyan, Tejumola. “Postmodernity, Postcoloniality, and African Studies.” Postmodernism, Postcoloniality, and African Studies, edited by Magubane, Zine, Africa World Press, 2003, pp. 39–53.Google Scholar
Olaniyan, Tejumola, and Quayson, Ato, editors. African Literature: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory. Blackwell Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Quayson, Ato. Postcolonialism: Theory, Practice or Process'? Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Shercliff, Emma, and Bakare-Yusuf, Bibi, editors. Valentine's Day Anthology, 2015. Ankara Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Yaeger, Patricia. “Editor's Column: The End of Post-colonial Theory? A Roundtable with Sunil Agani, Fernando Coronil, Gaurav Desai, Mamadou Diouf, Simon Gikandi, Susie Tharu, and Jennifer Wenzel.” PMLA, vol. 122, no. 3, 2007, pp. 633–51.Google Scholar