Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:16:57.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oral Composition in the Medieval Spanish Epic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Matthew Bailey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This essay addresses the question of whether the Spanish epic was composed orally or was a literary creation using the oral techniques of bards but composed in writing. Oral dictation played an important role in even the most literate works of the time. Theme was an important compositional aid employed by bards during performance, and its presence is evident in passages of the Cantar de Mio Cid and the Mocedades de Rodrigo. A new tool of analysis is introduced, the intonation unit, which leads to an understanding of Spanish epic narrative as orally composed and governed by the cognitive constraints of speech. Oral composition eventually included literate individuals whose contributions are linked to the social and political circumstances under which these poems were preserved on parchment.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 118 , Issue 2 , March 2003, pp. 254 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2003

References

Works Cited

Alfonso-Pinto, Fátima, ed. Mocedades de Rodrigo. Bailey, Mocedades 183–216.Google Scholar
Armistead, Samuel G. La tradición épica de las Mocedades de Rodrigo. Salamanca: U de Salamanca, 2000.Google Scholar
Bailey, Matthew. “Las asonancias inusitadas de las Mocedades de Rodrigo.” Revista de poética medieval 3 (1999): 9–30.Google Scholar
Bailey, Matthew, ed. Las Mocedades de Rodrigo: Estudios críticos, manuscrito y edición. London: King's College London Centre for Late Antique and Medieval Studies, 1999.Google Scholar
Bailey, Matthew. The Poema del Cid and the Poema de Fernán González: The Transformation of an Epic Tradition. Madison: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies, 1993.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert. “How Oral Is Oral Composition?” Signs of Orality. Ed. Mackay, E. Anne. Leiden: Brill, 1999. 29–48.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert. Poetry in Speech: Orality and Homeric Discourse. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantar de Mio Cid. Per Abbat ms. (vitrina 7–17). Biblioteca Nacional, Madrid. Cantar de Mio Cid. Ed. Matthew Bailey et al. 2002. Liberal Arts Instructional Technology Services, U of Texas, Austin. 20 Feb. 2003 <http://www.lamc.utexas.edu/cid/>..>Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. “The Deployment of Consciousness in the Production of Narrative.” The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Ed. Chafe. Norwood: Ablex, 1980. 9–50.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. Properties of Written and Spoken Language. Berkeley: U of California P, 1987.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T. From Memory to Written Record: England, 1066–1307. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Deyermond, Alan. “La autoría de las Mocedades de Rodrigo: Un replanteamiento.” Bailey, Mocedades 1–15.Google Scholar
Deyermond, Alan. La literatura perdida de la Edad Media. Catálogo y estudio, I: Epica y romances. Salamanca: U de Salamanca, 1995.Google Scholar
Duggan, Joseph J. “Formulaic Diction in the Cantar de mio Cid and the Old French Epic.” Forum for Modern Language Studies 10 (1974): 260–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, Nancy Joe. “Crónica de veinte reyes' Use of the Cid Epic: Perspectives, Method, and Rationale.” Romance Philology 33 (1979–80): 534–44.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin: U of Texas P, 1990.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Richard. The Quest for El Cid. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Richard, Fletcher, and Barton, Simon, eds. and trans. The World of El Cid: Chronicles of the Spanish Reconquest. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Fradejas Lebrero, José. “Valores literarios de la Crónica de veinte reyes.” Crónica de veinte reyes. Ed. Asencio, José Manuel Ruiz. Burgos: Ayuntamiento, 1991. 31–51.Google Scholar
Geary, John Steven. Formulaic Diction in the Poema de Fernán González and the Mocedades de Rodrigo: A Computer-Aided Analysis. Madrid: Porrúa, 1980.Google Scholar
Gómez Redondo, Fernando. Poesía española, 1, Edad Media: Juglaría, clerecía y romancero. Barcelona: Crítica, 1996.Google Scholar
Gómez Redondo, Fernando. “Recitación y recepción del Cantar: La transmisión de los modelos ideológicos.” El Cid: De la materia épica a las crónicas caballerescas. Ed. Alvar, Carlos, Redondo, Gómez, and Martin, Georges. Alcalá de Henares: U de Alcalá, 1999. 181–210.Google Scholar
Lord, Albert Bates. The Singer of Tales. 1960. Introd. Stephen Mitchell and Gregory Nagy. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Lord, Albert Bates. The Singer Resumes His Tale. Ed. Lord, Mary Louise. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Martin, Georges. Les juges de Castile: Mentalités et discours historique dans l'Espagne médiévale. Paris: Séminaire d'Etudes Médiévales Hispaniques, U de Paris–XIII, 1992.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón, ed. Cantar de mio Cid: Texto, gramática y vocabulario. Vol. 1. Madrid: Bailly-Baillière, 1908. 3 vols.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. De primitiva lírica española y antigua épica. Buenos Aires: Espasa-Calpe, 1951.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. En torno al Poema de mio Cid. Barcelona: EDHASA, 1963.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. Poesía juglaresca y juglares: Aspectos de la historia literaria y cultural de España. 2nd ed. Buenos Aires: Espasa-Calpe, 1945.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón, ed. Primera crónica general. Madrid: Bailly-Baillière, 1906.Google Scholar
Miletich, John S. “The Quest for the ‘Formula’: A Comparative Reappraisal.” Modern Philology 74 (1976–77): 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miletich, John S. “Repetition and Aesthetic Function in the Poema de mio Cid and South-Slavic Oral and Literary Epic.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 58 (1981): 189–96.Google Scholar
Montaner, Alberto, ed. Cantar de mio Cid. Barcelona: Crítica, 1993.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Thomas. “Adjective Patterning in Spanish Epic.” Olifant 17 (1993): 168–76.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Thomas. “The Lengthened Lines of the Mocedades de Rodrigo.” Romance Philology 38 (1984): 1–14.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Thomas. Medieval Spanish Epic: Mythic Roots and Ritual Language. University Park: Penn State UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Thomas. “Oral Art in Transition.” Mio Cid Studies. Ed. Deyermond, A. D. London: Tamesis, 1977. 91–112.Google Scholar
Pellen, René. “Forum on Manuscript Culture in Medieval Spain.” La corónica 27.1 (1998): 183–205.Google Scholar
Powell, Brian. Epic and Chronicle: The Poema de Mio Cid and the Crónica de veinte reyes. London: Modern Humanities Research Assn., 1983.Google Scholar
Rubin, David C. Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-Out Rhymes. New York: Oxford UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Russell, P. E. “San Pedro de Cardeña and the Heroic History of the Cid.” Medium Aevum 28.2 (1958): 57–79.Google Scholar
Smith, Colin. “On the ‘Lost Literature’ of Medieval Spain.” Guillaume d'Orange and the Chanson de geste. Ed. Wolfgang van Emden and Phillip E. Bennett. Reading: Société Rencesvals, 1984. 137–50.Google Scholar
Stock, Brian. The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Webber, Ruth House. “Formulaic Language in the Mocedades de Rodrigo.” Hispanic Review 48 (1980): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaderenko, Irene. Problemas de autoría, de estructura y de fuentes en el Poema de mio Cid. Alcalá de Henares: U de Alcalá, 1998.Google Scholar