Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:08:55.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Johnson's Dictionary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Robert DeMaria Jr
Robert DeMaria Jr*
Affiliation:
Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In definitions, occasional comments, and especially the selection of illustrative quotations, Johnson's Dictionary both conveys specific linguistic information and presents its readers with knowledge of the broadest kind. Like the abstract authority “the dictionary,” Johnson's Dictionary is an active instrument of the culture it reflects and helps to shape. As such, Johnson's book embodies a politics, while transmitting political views on every one of its quotation-filled pages. As a collection of quotations, the Dictionary tends to display an underlying political consensus founded on cultural assumptions winnowed from the arguments of combatants on a variety of different but, at a distance, analogous controversies. As a cultural act in its own right the Dictionary supports the growth of democracy and liberalism through its assistance to and dependence on the growing population of literate, book-buying, voting English citizens.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , January 1989, pp. 64 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Addison, Joseph. The Freeholder. Ed. Leheny, James. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.Google Scholar
Arbuthnot, John. The History of John Bull. Ed. Bower, Alan W. and Erickson, Robert A. Oxford: Clarendon, 1976.Google Scholar
Ashcraft, Richard. Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Works. 4 vols. London, 1740.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. The Life of Samuel Johnson. Ed. Hill, G. B. Rev. L. F. Powell. 6 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1934–50.Google Scholar
Boyce, Benjamin, and Boyce, Dorothy G. “Dr. Johnson's Definitions of ‘Tory’ and ‘Whig.‘” Notes and Queries 198 (Apr. 1953): 161–62.Google Scholar
DeMaria, Robert Jr. Johnson's Dictionary and the Language of Learning. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1986.Google Scholar
DeMaria, Robert Jr. “The Theory of Language in Johnson's Dictionary.” Johnson after Two Hundred Years. Ed. Korshin, Paul. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1986. 159–74.Google Scholar
Downie, J. A. Jonathan Swift, Political Writer. London: Routledge, 1984.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1969.10.1017/CBO9780511558436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. “The Politics of Locke in England and America in the Eighteenth Century.” John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Ed. Yolton, John W. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1969. 45–80.Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas. Letters. Ms. 1012 Bodleian Library, Oxford.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert. Patriarcha. Patriarcha and Other Political Works of Sir Robert Filmer. Ed. Laslett, Peter. Oxford: Blackwell, 1949. 49–126.Google Scholar
Giddings, Robert. “The Fall of Orgolio: Samuel Johnson as Parliamentary Reporter.” Samuel Johnson: New Critical Essays. Ed. Grundy, Isobel. Totowa: Barnes, 1984. 86–106.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark. “The Revolution of 1689: Pamphlets and the Allegiance Controversy.” Bulletin of Research in the Humanities 83 (1980): 473–564.Google Scholar
Greene, Donald. The Politics of Samuel Johnson. New Haven: Yale UP, 1960.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. “In and Out of the Language Lab.” TLS 11–17 Dec. 1987: 1373.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. London: Strahan, 1755.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. The Preceptor. Ed. Dodsley, Robert. 2 vols. London, 1748.Google Scholar
Kenyon, J. P. Revolution Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Kernan, Alvin. Printing Technology, Letters and Samuel Johnson. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Langford, Paul. The Excise Crisis: Society and Politics in the Age of Walpole. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar
Lock, F. P. Swift's Tory Politics. Newark: U of Delaware P, 1983.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1960.Google Scholar
Plumb, J. H. The Growth of Political Stability in England: 1675–1725. London: MacMillan, 1967.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. “The Myth of John Locke and the Obsession with Liberalism.” John Locke. Los Angeles: Willliam Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1980. 1–24.Google Scholar
Jürgen, Schäfer. Documentation in the O.E.D. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980.Google Scholar
Sledd, James, and Kolb, Gwin. “Johnson's Definitions of Whig and Tory.” PMLA 67 (1952): 882–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, Jonathan. Works. 19 vols. Dublin: Faulkener, 1756–68.Google Scholar
Temple, Sir William. “An Essay upon the Original and Nature of Government.” Works. Vol. 1. London, 1757. 29–57. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Thompson, Martyn P. “The Reception of Locke's Two Treatises of Government 1690–1705.” Political Studies 24.2 (1976): 184–91.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William K. “Johnson's Treatment of Bolingbroke in the Dictionary.” Modern Language Review 43 (1948): 78–80.Google Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha. “The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the ‘Author.‘” Eighteenth-Century Studies 17 (1984): 425–48.10.2307/2738129CrossRefGoogle Scholar