Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T09:28:33.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professionalism, Relativism, and Rationality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

James L. Battersby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Translation, interpretation, adjudication, and objective knowledge are possible in a world without a foundation, a world that precludes the testing and squaring of claims against a reality external to conceptual schemes. In critical studies the prevailing relativist views assume that meanings and references are unstable, that facts, things, emphases, and values depend on various culture- or community-driven conceptual schemes, and hence that defining the inherent interests of literary and other texts is impossible. On the contrary, texts are knowable as internally justified, preregistered systems of intentionality and rationality. Each text exists as such a system prior to interpretation, and it is this system of determinate values and emphases to which interpretive analysis is accountable.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 107 , Issue 1: Special Topic: Theory of Literary History , January 1992 , pp. 51 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Barnes, Annette On Interpretation: A Critical Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Craige, Betty Jean Literary Relativity: An Essay on Twentieth-Century Narrative. Lewisburg; Bucknell UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon-Oxford UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47 (1974): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Walter A “The Fisher King: Wille zur Macht in Baltimore.” Critical Inquiry 10 (1984): 668–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Man, Paul “The Return to Philology.” Times Literary Supplement 10 Dec. 1982: 1355–13.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley “Anti-professionalism.” New Literary History 17 (1985): 89–108. (Rpt. in Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke UP, 1989. 215–46.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley “Resistance and Independence: A Reply to Gerald Graff.” New Literary History 17 (1985): 119–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson “Notes on a Well-Made World.” Partisan Review 51 (1984): 276–27.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald “Interpretation on Tlön: A Response to Stanley Fish.” New Literary History 17 (1985): 109–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr “The Politics of Theories of Interpretation.” Critical Inquiry 9 (1982): 235–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.Google Scholar
Phelan, James “Data, Danda, and Disagreement.” Diacritics 13 (1983): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Michael The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1967.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary “The Craving for Objectivity.” New Literary History 15 (1984): 229–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary Realism and Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary Representation and Reality. Cambridge: MIT P, 1988.Google Scholar
Putnam, Ruth Anna. “Poets, Scientists, and Critics.” New Literary History 17 (1985): 17–21.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V Theories and Things. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Rader, Ralph W “Fact, Theory, and Literary Explanation.” Critical Inquiry 1 (1974): 245–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1982.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1988.Google Scholar