Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:28:44.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scripture and Poetic Discourse in The Subjection of Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Susan Hardy Aiken
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although critics have largely overlooked the literary properties of The Subjection of Women, the essay's effectiveness as theory is inseparable from its poetic dimension. To persuade an unsympathetic audience of a radically subversive thesis, Mill weaves into his argument a poetic subtext modeled on the preeminent mythos of the Western world, the biblical account of history from the fall to paradise. At the same time, aware that Scripture has historically been used to authorize patriarchal values, he exploits the self-critical impulse inherent in biblical hermeneutic traditions, formulating a thematics of language, writing, and interpretation that allows him to turn patriarchal discourse against itself. He dismantles the very myth he employs in order to remake it as a vehicle for his liberating vision.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , May 1983, pp. 353 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Abrams, M. H. Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. “Mill and The Subjection of Women.” Philosophy 52 (April 1977): 179–94.Google Scholar
August, Eugene. John Stuart Mill: A Mind at Large. New York: Scribner's, 1975.Google Scholar
August, Eugene. “Mill's Autobiography as Philosophic Cornmedia.” Victorian Poetry 11 (1973): 143–62.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Rise B. “Argument and Strategy in Mill's The Subjection of Women.” Victorian Newsletter 46 (1974): 10–14.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex. Trans. Parshley, H. M. New York: Knopf, 1953.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. History and Eschatology. New York: Harper, 1957.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “New Testament and Mythology.” In Kerygma and Myth. Ed. Bartsch, Hans Werner. Trans. Fuller, Reginald H. London: S.P.C.K., 1953, 1–44.Google Scholar
Carr, Wendell Robert, introd. The Subjection of Women. By John Stuart Mill. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Christ, Carol P., and Plaskow, Judith, eds. Womanspirit Rising: A Feminist Reader in Religion. New York: Harper, 1978.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. “Sorties.” In La Jeune Née. By Cixous and Catherine Clément. Paris: Union Générale d'Editions, 1975, 115–246.Google Scholar
Cohn, Norman. The Pursuit of the Millennium. Rev. ed. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Dale, Peter Allen. The Victorian Critic and the Idea of History. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. Beyond God the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women's Liberation. Boston: Beacon, 1973.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. The Church and the Second Sex with a New Feminist Postchristian Introduction. New York: Harper Colophon, 1975.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon, 1978.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. La vita nuova. Trans. Reynolds, Barbara. New York: Penguin, 1967.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “La Différence.” In Marges de la philosophic Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1972, 3–29.Google Scholar
Ford, George H. Introd. to John Stuart Mill. In The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. Abrams, M. H. et al. 4th ed. New York: Norton, 1979, 2:1049–51.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor: Their Friendship and Subsequent Marriage. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Houghton, Walter. The Victorian Frame of Mind. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Annette. “Dancing through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, Practice, and Politics of a Feminist Literary Criticism.” Feminist Studies 6 (1980): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koonz, Claudia, and Bridenthal, Renate. Becoming Visible: Women in European History. Boston: Houghton, 1977.Google Scholar
Landow, George. Victorian Types, Victorian Shadows: Biblical Typology in Victorian Literature, Art, and Thought. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Trans. Bell, James H. et al. Rev. ed. Boston: Beacon, 1969.Google Scholar
Marks, Elaine, and de Courtivron, Isabelle, eds. The New French Feminisms. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1963–. Vol. 1: Autobiography and Literary Essays. Ed. Jack Stillinger. 1981. Vol. 10: Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. Ed. John Robson. 1969. Vols. 12 and 13: The Earlier Letters of John Stuart Mill. Ed. Francis E. Mineka. 1963. Vol. 15: The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1849–1873. Ed. Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley. 1972. Vol. 17: The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1849–1873. Ed. Mineka and Lindley. 1972.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Dissertations and Discussions. Boston: William Spencer, 1867.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Early Essays. Ed. J. M. W. Gibbs. London, 1897.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. The Letters of John Stuart Mill. Ed. Elliot, Hugh S. R. London: Longmans, Green, 1910.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women. In Essays on Sex Equality. By John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor Mill. Ed. Alice Rossi. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1970, 123–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, Kate. Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday, 1969.Google Scholar
Neff, Emery. Carlyle and Mill. Rev. ed. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Rev. of Brian Vickers' Classical Rhetoric in English Poetry. College English 33 (1972): 612–16.Google Scholar
Richman, Michèle. “Eroticism in the Patriarchal Order.” Diacritics 6 (1976): 46–53.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. M. A History of Freethought in the Nineteenth Century. London: Watts, 1929.Google Scholar
Robson, John M. The Improvement of Mankind. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Robson, John M. “John Stuart Mill.” In Victorian Prose: A Guide to Research. Ed. DeLaura, David J. New York: MLA, 1973, 187–218.Google Scholar
Rossi, Alice, ed. Essays on Sex Equality. By John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor Mill. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gay le. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women. Ed. Reiter, Rayna R. New York: Monthly Review, 1975, 157–210.Google Scholar
Ruether, Rosemary Radford, ed. Religion and Sexism: Images of Women in the Jewish and Christian Traditions. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1974.Google Scholar
Russell, Lettie. The Liberating Word. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1976.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. “The Text, the World, the Critic.” In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ed. Harari, Josué V. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press, 1979, 161–88.Google Scholar
Schneidau, Herbert. Sacred Discontent: The Bible and Western Tradition. 1976; rpt. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Schweik, Robert G. “Rhetorical Art and Literary Form in Mill's The Subjection of Women.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 61 (1975): 23–30.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Elinor S. Kubla Khan and the Fall of Jerusalem: The Mythological School in Biblical Criticism and Secular Literature, 1770–1880. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Sharpless, Parvin. The Literary Criticism of John Stuart Mill. Paris: Mouton, 1967.Google Scholar
Sharpless, Parvin, introd. Essays on Poetry by John Stuart Mill. Columbia: Univ. of South Carolina Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Stillinger, Jack, introd. Autobiography and Other Writings. By John Stuart Mill. Boston: Houghton, 1969.Google Scholar
Tatalovich, Anne. “John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women: An Analysis.” Southern Quarterly 12 (July 1974):87–105.Google Scholar
Trible, Phyllis. “Depatriarchalizing in Biblical Interpretation.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 41 (1973):30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1973.Google Scholar