Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T20:02:04.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secularism in the Framework of Heterodoxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Gauri Yiswanathan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The rise of the religious right in societies around the world has brought back the contentious issue of religion's place in modern life. The secularization thesis is constantly invoked to explain the historical devaluation of religion's function in society (at least in the Protestant world) from normative to nominal as religion is relegated to the private space of individual belief. While the subject has engaged historians, sociologists, and religious scholars for a long time, yielding a vast and proliferating body of work (Asad; Berger; Casanova; Connolly; Taylor, Secular Age; Wilson), the field of literary studies has not witnessed a corresponding breadth of scholarship. This may be partly due to literature's self-definition as a secular vehicle for ideas whose possible religious origins were subsequently effaced as religious sensibility became absorbed into aesthetic form and imagery, especially in modernist writing. Contributing in no small measure to the perception that literature represents an outgrowth of secularism is Matthew Arnold's influential claim that literature succeeds a depleted Christianity and contains the moral values and direction once supplied by a religious ethos.

Information

Type
The Changing Profession
Information
PMLA , Volume 123 , Issue 2 , March 2008, pp. 466 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by The Modern Language Association of America

References

Works Cited

Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy. 1869. Ed. Wilson, John Dover. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayly, C. A. The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. 1967. New York: Anchor, 1990.Google Scholar
Besant, Annie. Ancient Wisdom. 1897. Madras: Theosophical, 1939.Google Scholar
Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. A Land of Mystery. 1880. Bangalore: Theosophy, 1982.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Trans. Robert M. Wallace. Cambridge: MIT P, 1983.Google Scholar
Caputo, John D., and Vattimo, Gianni. After the Death of God. Ed. Robbins, Jeffrey W. New York: Columbia UP, 2007.Google Scholar
Carlson, Maria. “No Religion Higher Than Truth”: A History of the Theosophical Movement in Russia, 1875–1922. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Casanova, José. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William. Why I Am Not a Secularist. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1999.Google Scholar
During, Simon. “Literary Subjectivity.” ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature 31.1–2 (2000): 33–50.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion. Trans. Oscar Burge. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip. “Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ca. 1300–1700.” American Sociological Review 65.1 (2000): 138–67.Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, Wouter. New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Thought. Leiden: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Karen. What Is Gnosticism? Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. Meaning in History. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1949.Google Scholar
Masuzawa, Tomoko. The Invention of World Religions; or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Frederic W. H. Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, 1903. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Nelson, Victoria. The Secret Life of Puppets. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Owen, Alex. The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecora, Vincent. Secularization and Cultural Criticism: Religion, Nation, and Modernity. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006.Google Scholar
Sinnett, Alfred P. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett: From the Mahatmas M. and K. H. Ed. A. T. Barker. 1923. Madras: Theosophical, 1979.Google Scholar
Styers, Randall. Making Magic: Religion, Magic, and Science in the Modern World. New York: Oxford UP, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. “Closed World Structures.” Religion after Metaphysics. Ed. Wrathall, Mark A. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2007. Thomas, Keith. Religion and the Decline of Magic. New York: Scribner's, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viswanathan, Gauri. Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India. New York: Columbia UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, Gauri. Outside the Fold: Conversion, Modernity, and Belief. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Ed. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C. New York: Oxford UP, 1946.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bryan R. Religion in Secular Society. London: Watts, 1966.Google Scholar