No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Reactions in France to Jean-Pierre Jeunet's phenomenally successful film Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain (2001) tend to fall into two groups. According to one perspective, the film is a superficial and racially sanitized form of cine-tourism; according to another, it is a profound and sincere celebration of traditional French values. For both groups, the cultural work the film performs coalesces around close-ups of the face of Audrey Tautou, the film's star. This essay asks how Tautou's face and the close-up shot it exemplifies can say so much while showing so little. By drawing on the theoretical history of camera distance, it argues that the formal design of the close-up, which demands simultaneously an analytic and an affective response to the visual image, usefully informs the relations between political reactions to the film and French debates around the question of national identity at the start of the twenty-first century.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- PMLA , Volume 126 , Issue 4: Special Topic: Celebrity, Fame, Notoriety , October 2011 , pp. 1042 - 1060
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2011
References
Works Cited
Agacinski, Sylviane. Politique des sexes: Précédé de mise au point sur la mixité. Paris: Points, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Agulhon, Maurice. Marianne au pouvoir. L'imagerie et la symbolique républicaines de 1880 à 1914. Paris: Flammarion, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Agulhon, Maurice. Marianne into Battle: Republican Imagery and Symbolism in France, 1789–1880. Trans. Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Alion, Yves. “La liberté à tout prix: Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain de Jean-Pierre Jeunet.” Avant-scène cinéma 502 (2001): 125–26. Print.Google Scholar
Amélie. Dir. Jean-Pierre Jeunet. Miramax, 2002. DVD.Google Scholar
Andrew, Dudley. “Amélie; or, Le Fabuleux Destin du Cinéma Français.” Film Quarterly 57.3 (2004): 34–46. Print.10.1525/fq.2004.57.3.34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augé, Marc. Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. Trans. John Howe. London: Verso, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Austin, J. F. “Digitizing Frenchness in 2001: On a Historic Moment in the French Cinema.” French Cultural Studies 15.3 (2004): 281–99. Print.Google Scholar
Balázs, Béla. Theory of the Film: Character and Growth of a New Art. Trans. Edith Bone. New York: Dover, 1970. Print.Google Scholar
Belleret, Robert. “L'édifiante histoire du fabuleux succès d'Amélie Poulain.” Le monde 6–7 May 2001: 22. Print.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. New York: Schocken, 1969. 217–51. Print.Google Scholar
Bergery, Benjamin. “Cinematic Impressionism.” American Cinematographer Dec. 2004: 58–69. Print.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Pascal, and Bancel, Nicolas, eds. Culture post-coloniale, 1961–2006. Traces et mémoires coloniales en France. Paris: Autrement, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Bonnaud, Frédéric. “The Amélie Effect.” Trans. Alice Lovejoy. Film Comment 37.6 (2001): 36–38. Print.Google Scholar
Braudy, Leo. The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and Its History. New York: Vintage, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Bresson, Gilles, Dely, Renaud, and Hassoux, Didier. “‘Un besoin de bonheur simple.‘” Libération 2–3 June 2001: 2–3. Print.Google Scholar
Celestin, Roger, and DalMolin, Eliane. France from 1851 to the Present. New York: Palgrave, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delerm, Philippe. La première petite gorgée de bière et autres plaisirs minuscules. Paris: Gallimard, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Deltombe, Thomas. L'islam imaginaire: La construction médiatique de l'islamophobie en France, 1975–2005. Paris: La Découverte, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. “The Close-up: Scale and Detail in the Cinema.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 14.3 (2003): 89–111. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. “Veiling over Desire: Close-ups of the Woman.” Femmes Fatales: Feminism, Film Theory, Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge, 1991. 44–75. Print.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Sergei. Film Form: Essays in Film Theory. Trans. Jay Leyda. New York: Harcourt, 1949. Print.Google Scholar
Epstein, Jean. “Magnification and Other Writings.” October 3 (1977): 9–25. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erkkila, Betsy. “Greta Garbo: Sailing beyond the Frame.” Critical Inquiry 11.4 (1985): 595–619. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezra, Elizabeth. “The Death of an Icon: Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain.” French Cultural Studies 15.3 (2004): 301–10. Print.Google Scholar
Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain. Dir. Jean-Pierre Jeunet. Perf. Audrey Tautou and Mathieu Kassovitz. UGC, 2001. Film.Google Scholar
Fischer, Lucy. “Greta Garbo and Silent Cinema: The Actress as Art Deco Icon.” Camera Obscura 16.3 (2001): 83–110. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourest, Caroline. La dernière utopie. Menaces sur l'universalisme. Paris: Grasset, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Frodon, Jean-Michel. “Une chevauchée fantastique sans pareil.” Le monde 1 Jan. 2002: 24. Print.Google Scholar
Geisser, Vincent. “L'intégration républicaine: Réflexion sur une problématique post-coloniale.” Blanchard and Bancel 145–62.Google Scholar
Grand débat sur l'identité nationale. Ministère de l'Immigration, de l'Intégration, de l'Identité Nationale et du Développement Solidaire, n.d. Web. 21 June 2010.Google Scholar
Haun, Harry. “Fantasy in Paris: Jean-Pierre Jeunet Delights Audiences with Tale of Amélie.” Film Journal International 1 Nov. 2001: 14–16. Print.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism; or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Jeancolas, Jean-Pierre. “The Reconstruction of French Cinema.” France in Focus: Film and National Identity. Ed. Ezra, Elizabeth and Harris, Sue. New York: Berg, 2000. 13–21. Print.Google Scholar
Lançon, Philippe. “Le frauduleux destin d'Amélie Poulain.” Libération 2 June 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Lavoignat, Jean-Pierre. “Le Paris de Jean-Pierre Jeunet.” Studio 158 (2000): 12–17. Print.Google Scholar
Lebovics, Herman. Bringing the Empire Back Home: France in the Global Age. Durham: Duke UP, 2004. Print.10.1215/9780822386117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Léger, Fernand. “A New Realism: The Object.” An Introduction to the Art of the Movies. Ed. Jacobs, Lewis. New York: Noonday, 1960. Print.Google Scholar
Lorrain, F. G. “Le douloureux destin de Mathilde.” Le point 21 Oct. 2004: 72–73. Print.Google Scholar
Martin-Castelnau, David, and Bigot, Guillaume. “Le secret d'Amélie Poulain.” Libération 28 May 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. “The Autonomy of Affect.” Deleuze: A Critical Reader. Ed. Patton, Paul. London: Blackwell, 1996. 217–39. Print.Google Scholar
Metz, Christian. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. Trans. Michael Taylor. New York: Oxford UP, 1974. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moine, Raphaëlle. “Vieux genres? Nouveaux genres? Le fabuleux destin de quelques films français.” Cinéma contemporain: État des lieux. Ed. Esquenazi, Jean-Pierre. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2004. 151–66. Print.Google Scholar
Mulard, Claudine, and Sotinel, Thomas. “Amélie Poulain, un tour du monde en 17 millions d'entrées.” Le monde 1 Jan. 2002: 24. Print.Google Scholar
Napoléon. Dir. Abel Gance. Perf. Albert Dieudonné. Société Générale des Films, 1927. Film.Google Scholar
Nora, Pierre. “Entre mémoire et histoire. La problématique des lieux.” Les lieux de mémoir. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, 1997. 23–42. Print.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, Charlotte. “Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain!' Sight and Sound Oct. 2001: 40–41. Print.Google Scholar
Pardo, Carlos. “Crimes, pornographie et mépris du peuple: Des films français fascinés par le sordide.” Le monde diplomatique (2000): 28. Print.Google Scholar
Péron, Didier. “Quatre millions d'adhérents au parti d'Amélie Poulain.” Libération 2–3 June 2001: 2–3. Print.Google Scholar
Powrie, Philip. “Transtitial Woman: New Representations of Women in Contemporary French Cinema.” L'Esprit Créateur 52.3 (2002): 81–91. Print.10.1353/esp.2010.0429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosello, Mireille. “Auto-portraits glanés et plaisirs partagés: Les glaneurs et la glaneuse et Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain.” L'Esprit Créateur 52.3 (2002): 3–16. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelle, Scatton-Tessier. “Le Petisme: Flirting with the Sordid in Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain.” Studies in French Cinema 4.3 (2004): 197–207. Print.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. Reading the Detail: Aesthetics and the Feminine. New York: Methuen, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. Parité! Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005. Print.10.7208/chicago/9780226741093.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. Politics of the Veil. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiesse, Anne-Marie. Faire les Français: Quelle identité nationale? Paris: Stock, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Thrift, Nigel. “Understanding the Material Practices of Glamour.” The Affect Theory Reader. Ed. Gregg, Melissa and Seigworth, Gregory J. Durham: Duke UP, 2010. 289–308. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turvey, Malcolm. “The Avant-Garde and the ‘New Spirit’: The Case of Ballet mécanique.” October 102 (2002): 35–58. Print.Google Scholar
Westbrook, John. “Cultivating Kitsch: Cultural Bovéism.” Sites: The Journal of Twentieth-Century Contemporary French Studies 6.2 (2002): 424–35. Print.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Daniel. “Going Sweet and Sentimental Has Its Rewards.” New York Times 28 Oct. 2001, sec. 1: 13. Print.Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 1
- Cited by