Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T03:46:52.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telegraphic Realism: Henry James's In the Cage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Richard Menke
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In setting his 1898 tale In the Cage in a telegraph office, Henry James was adapting and investigating a metaphor that earlier novelists had used for the workings of fiction. As invoked by writers such as Elizabeth Gaskell and Charles Dickens, the idealized image of the electric telegraph hints at some of the formal and ideological properties of Victorian realism. With In the Cage James proves to be more alert than such predecessors not only to the social and technological mechanics of telegraphy but also to the significance of mediation—in telegraphy as well as in realist fiction. Analyzing the conjunction this essay calls “telegraphic realism” indicates the ways in which a medium's imaginative possibilities may change over time and suggests the connections between the histories of media and of literature.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 115 , Issue 5 , October 2000, pp. 975 - 990
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Aswell, E. Duncan. “James's In the Cage: The Telegraphist as Artist.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 8 (1966): 375–37.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Holquist, Michael. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, . Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.Google Scholar
Bauer, Dale M., and Lakritz, Andrew. “Language, Class, and Sexuality in Henry James's In the Cage.” New Orleans Review 14.3 (1987): 61–69.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. “‘Wireless’: Popular Physics, Radio, and Modernism.” Cultural Babbage: Technology, Time, and Invention. Ed. Spufford, Francis and Uglow, Jenny. London: Faber, 1996. 149–14.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles F, and Maverick, Augustus. The Story of the Telegraph, and a History of the Great Atlantic Cable. New York: Rudd and Carleton, 1858.Google Scholar
Cameron, Sharon. Thinking in Henry James. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1989.Google Scholar
Clayton, Jay. “The Voice in the Machine: Hazlitt, Hardy, James.” Language Machines: Technologies of Literary and Cultural Production. Ed. Masten, Jeffrey, Stallybrass, Peter, and Vickers, Nancy. New York: Routledge, 1997. 209–20.Google Scholar
Coe, Lewis. The Telegraph: A History of Morse's Invention and Its Predecessors in the United States. Jefferson: Mc-Farland, 1993.Google Scholar
Cohn, Dorrit. “Optics and Power in the Novel.” New Literary History 26 (1995): 3–20.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Bleak House. 1852–53. Ed. Norman Page. London: Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Charles Dickens' Book of Memoranda: A Photographic and Typographic Facsimile of the Notebook Begun in January 1855. Transcribed and annotated by Fred Kaplan. New York: New York Public Lib., 1981.Google Scholar
Edel, Leon. The Life of Henry James. 1953–72. 5 vols. New York: Avon, 1978.Google Scholar
Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. Realism and Consensus in the English Novel: Time, Space and Narrative. 1983. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Gabler-Hover, Janet. “The Ethics of Determinism in Henry James's In the Cage.” Henry James Review 13 (1992): 253–25.10.1353/hjr.2010.0359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. The Letters of Mrs Gaskell. Ed. Chappie, J. A. V. and Pollard, Arthur. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1967.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. A Laodicean; or, The Castle of the De Stancys: A Story of To-day. 1881. Ed. Jane Gatewood. Oxford: World's Classics-Oxford UP, 1991.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Critical Muse: Selected Literary Criticism. Ed. Gard, Roger. London: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar
James, Henry. In the Cage. 1898. Complete Stories, 1892–1898. New York: Lib. of Amer., 1996. 835–923.Google Scholar
James, Henry. Letters. Ed. Edel, Leon. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 1984.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Portrait of a Lady. 1881. Ed. Geoffrey Moore. London: Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar
James, Henry. Preface. What Maisie Knew; In the Cage; “The Pupil.” New York Ed. Vol. 11. New York: Scribner's, 1908. v-xxii.Google Scholar
James, Henry. What Maisie Knew. 1897. Ed. Paul Theroux. London: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “Modernism and Imperialism.” Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature. By Terry Eagleton, Jameson, and Edward W. Said. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1990. 43–66.Google Scholar
Kipling, Rudyard. “The Deep-Sea Cables.” Rudyard Kipling, Complete Verse: Definitive Edition. New York: Anchor-Doubleday, 1989. 173.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich A Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Trans. Michael Metteer, with Chris Cullens. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Kreilkamp, Ivan. “A Voice without a Body: The Phonographic Logic of Heart of Darkness.” Victorian Studies 40 (1997): 211–21.Google Scholar
Marvin, Carolyn. When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking about Electric Communication in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Moody, Andrew J “The Harmless Pleasure of Knowing': Privacy in the Telegraph Office and Henry James's In the Cage.” Henry James Review 16 (1995): 53–65.10.1353/hjr.1995.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Heath. “More Royalist Than the King: The Governess, the Telegraphist, and Mrs. Gracedew.” Criticism 24 (1982): 16–35.Google Scholar
Morus, Iwan Rhys. “The Electric Ariel: Telegraphy and Commercial Culture in Early Victorian England.” Victorian Studies 39 (1996): 339–33.Google Scholar
Nixon, Nicola. “The Reading Gaol of Henry James's In the Cage.” ELH 66 (1999): 179–201.10.1353/elh.1999.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrman, Ralf. “The Intercepted Telegram Plot in Henry James's In the Cage.” Notes and Queries ns 24 (1977): 425–42.Google Scholar
Rowe, John Carlos. The Other Henry James. Durham: Duke UP, 1998.10.1215/9780822398530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savoy, Eric, “In the Cage and the Queer Effects of Gay History.” Novel 28 (1995): 284–307.10.2307/1345925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, Mark. Bodies and Machines. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Mark. “The Graphic Unconscious: A Response.” New Literary History 26 (1995): 21–28.10.1353/nlh.1995.0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standage, Tom. The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century's Online Pioneers. New York: Walker, 1998.Google Scholar
Stevens, Hugh. “Queer Henry In the Cage.” The Cambridge Companion to Henry James. Ed. Freedman, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. 120–12.Google Scholar
Stoker, Bram. Dracula. 1897. Ed. A. N. Wilson. Oxford: World's Classics-Oxford UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Thurschwell, Pamela. “Henry James and Theodora Bosanquet: On the Typewriter, In the Cage, at the Ouija Board.” Textual Practice 13 (1999): 5–23.10.1080/09502369908582327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. An Autobiography. 1883. Ed. Michael Sadleirand Frederick Page. Oxford: World's Classics-Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. “The Telegraph Girl.” 1877. Later Short Stories. Ed. Sutherland, John. Oxford: World's Classics-Oxford UP, 1995. 354–35.Google Scholar
Wicke, Jennifer. “Henry James's Second Wave.” Henry James Review 10 (1989): 146–14.10.1353/hjr.2010.0347CrossRefGoogle Scholar