Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T01:55:22.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thinking in La vida es sueño

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

C. Christopher Soufas Jr
C. Christopher Soufas Jr*
Affiliation:
West Chester University West Chester, Pennsylvania
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Examining the epistemological assumptions governing Calderón's theocentric view of life provides an accessible framework to overcome the many difficulties in reading La vida es sueño as a document of human experience. Segismundo's problems arise from an incomplete understanding of himself and the world. A prisoner since birth, the prince overcompensates intellectually for a life of sensual deprivation. Alienated from both the world and the sensitive centers of his humanity, he thinks to excess because his principal conduit to the world, his imagination, has remained underdeveloped. Through his palace experiences and his three encounters with Rosaura, Segismundo learns to adapt his inappropriate thinking by understanding that he must dialogue with the world rather than construct arguments against it.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , May 1985, pp. 287 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologica. Basic Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas. Ed. Pegis, Anton C. 2 vols. New York: Random, 1945. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Bandera, Cesáreo. “El ‘confuso abismo’ de La vida es sueño.” MLN 87 (1972): 214–31. Rpt. in Calderón y la crítica: Historica y antología. Ed. Durán, Manuel and Echevarría, Roberto González. 2 vols. Madrid: Gredos, 1976. 2: 723-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Eric. “The Universality of the Comedia.” Hispanic Review 38 (1970): 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryans, J. V. “Rosaura Liberated or a Woman's Rebellion: A New Reading of the Subplot of La vida es sueño.” University of British Columbia Hispanic Studies. Ed. Liverman, Harold. London: Tamesis, 1971. 19–32.Google Scholar
Calderón de la Barca, Pedro. La vida es sueño. Ed. Sloman, A. E. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1961.Google Scholar
Calderón de la Barca, Pedro. El pintor de su deshonra. Dramas de Honor. Ed. Briones, Angel Valbuena. 3rd ed. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1970. 119–231.Google Scholar
Cilveti, Angel. El significado de La vida es sueño. Valencia: Albatros, 1971.Google Scholar
Covarrubias Horozco, Sebastian de. Tesoro de la lengua castellana o española. Ed. Martín de Riquer. Barcelona: Horta, 1943.Google Scholar
DeArmas, Frederick A. “The Return of Astrea: An Astral-Imperial Myth in Calderón's La vida es sueño.” Calderón de la Barca at the Tercentenary: Comparative Views. Lubbock: Texas Tech P, 1982. 135–59.Google Scholar
DeArmas, Frederick A. “The Serpent Star: Dream and Horoscope in Calderón's La vida es sueño.” Forum for Modern Language Studies 19 (1983): 208–23.Google Scholar
Diccionario de autoridades. Madrid: Gredos, 1979.Google Scholar
Escribano, F. S. “Sobre el origen de ‘El delito mayor / del hombre es haber nacido,‘ La vida es sueño, I, 111-112.” Romance Notes 3 (1962): 50–51.Google Scholar
Farinelli, Arturo. La vita è un sogno. Torino: Fratelli Bocca, 1916.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Harper, 1972.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage-Random, 1973.Google Scholar
Fox, Dian. “Kingship and Community in La vida es sueño.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 58 (1981): 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracián, Baltasar. Agudeza y arte de ingenio. Madrid: Castalia, 1969.Google Scholar
Green, Otis H. “El ingenioso hidalgo.” Hispanic Review 25 (1957): 175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, H. B. “Poetic Justice in La vida es sueño: A Further Comment.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 46 (1969): 128–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, H. B. “Segismundo and the Rebel Soldier.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 45 (1968): 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiple, Daniel L. “The Tradition behind the Punishment of the Rebel Soldier in La vida es sueño.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 50 (1973): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiple, Daniel L. “Renaissance Medical Psychology in Don Quijote.” Ideologies and Literature 2 (1979): 65–72.Google Scholar
Hesse, Everett W. “Calderón's Concept of the Perfect Prince in La vida es sueño.” Wardropper, Essays 114–33.Google Scholar
Hesse, Everett W. “La vida es sueño and the Divided Self.” Theology, Sex, and the Comedia and Other Essays. Madrid: José Porrúa Turranzas, 1983. 112–26.Google Scholar
Honig, Edwin. “Reading What's in La vida es sueño.” Theatre Annual 20 (1963): 63–71.Google Scholar
Huarte de San Juan, Juan. Examen de ingenios. Biblioteca de autores españoles 65. Madrid: Atlas, 1953.Google Scholar
Ife, Barry W. “Castigos y premios en La vida es sueño.” Hacia Calderón: Tercer Coloquio Anglogermano, Londres, 1973. Ed. Flasche, Hans. Berlin: Gruyter, 1976. 32–46.Google Scholar
Jones, Cyril A. “Tirso de Molina's El melancólico and Cervantes' El licenciado vidriera.” Studio Ibérica: Festschrift für Hans Flasche. Ed. Körner, Karl-Herman and Rühl, Klaus. Bern: Francke, 1973. 295–305.Google Scholar
Lavroff, Ellen C. “Who Is Rosaura? Another Look at La vida es sueño.” Revue des langues vivantes 42 (1976): 482–96.Google Scholar
Maurin, Margaret S. “The Monster, the Sepulchre, and the Dark: Related Patterns of Imagery in La vida es sueño.” Hispanic Review 35 (1967): 161–78.Google Scholar
May, T. E. “Segismundo y el soldado rebelde.” Hacia Calderón: Coloquio Anglogermano, Exeter, 1969. Ed. Flasche, Hans. Berlin: Gruyter, 1970. 71–75.Google Scholar
Mejía, Pedro. Silva de varia leccion. Madrid: Sociedad de Bibliófilos Españoles, 1933.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pelayo, Marcelino. Calderón y su teatro. Madrid, 1881.Google Scholar
Merrick, C. A. “Clotaldo's Role in La vida es sueño.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 50 (1973): 256–69.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Thomas A. “Is the Spanish Comedia a Metatheater?” Hispanic Review 43 (1975): 275–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palley, Julian. “‘Si fue mi maestro un sueño’: Segismundo's Dream.” Kentucky Romance Quarterly 23 (1976): 149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Alexander A. “Calderón's Rebel Soldier and Poetic Justice.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 46 (1969): 120–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Alexander A. “Towards a Definition of Calderonian Tragedy.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 39 (1962): 222–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Alan K. G. “The Traffic of the Stage in Calderón's La vida es sueño.” Renaissance Drama 4 (1971): 155–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pring-Mill, Robert. “Los calderonistas de habla inglesa y La vida es sueño: Métodos de análisis temático-estructural.” Litterae Hispanae et Lusitanae. Ed. Flasche, Hans. München: Heuven, 1968. 369–413.Google Scholar
Reichenberger, Arnold G. “The Uniqueness of the Comedia.” Hispanic Review 27 (1959): 303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J. The Discourse of Modernism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Serna, Ven. “Rosaura: Mujer, varón y monstruo.” Actas del Sexto Congreso Internacional de Hispanistas. Ed. Gordon, Alan M. and Rugg, Evelyn. Toronto: Dept. of Spanish and Portuguese, U of Toronto, 1980. 691–93.Google Scholar
Sloman, A. E. “The Structure of Calderón's La vida es sueño.” Wardropper, Essays 90–100.Google Scholar
Soufas, Teresa Scott. “Calderón's Melancholy Wife-Murderers.” Hispanic Review 52 (1984): 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez-Galbán, Eugenio. “Vuelta a Segismundo y el Soldado Rebelde.” Romance Notes 13 (1971): 143–46.Google Scholar
Suárez-Galbán, Eugenio. “El conflicto de Clotaldo: Visión psicológica.” La Torre 65 (1969): 69–83.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Henry W. “Tam clara et evidens: ‘Clear and Distinct Ideas’ in Calderón, Descartes and Francisco Suárez S. J.” Perpectivas de la Comedia. Ed. Ebersole, Alva V. 2 vols. Valencia: Albatros Hispanófila, 1979. 2: 128–36.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis. Obras completas. 2 vols. Madrid: Aguilar, 1948.Google Scholar
Wardropper, Bruce W. “‘Apenas llega cuando llega a penas.‘” Modern Philology 57 (1960): 240–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardropper, Bruce W., ed. Critical Essays on the Theatre of Calderón. New York: New York UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Wardropper, Bruce W. “The Standing of Calderón in the Twentieth Century.” Approaches to the Theatre of Calderón. Ed. McGaha, Michael D. Washington: Catholic U of America P, 1982. 1–16.Google Scholar
Wardropper, Bruce W. “The Wife-Murder Plays in Retrospect.” Revista Canadiense de Esudios Hispánicos 5 (1981): 383–95.Google Scholar
Whitby, William M. “Rosaura's Role in the Structure of Calderón's La vida es sueño.” Wardropper, Essays 101–13.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. M. “On La vida es sueño.” Wardropper, Essays 63–89.Google Scholar