Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:01:22.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas Jefferson and the Anglo-Saxon Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Stanley R. Hauer
Stanley R. Hauer*
Affiliation:
University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout his life, Jefferson maintained an active but intermittent interest in the study of Old English. He collected a sizable library in the subject and advocated the utility of Old English to the professions, especially law. His major work, the Essay on the Anglo-Saxon Language, proposed radical simplifications in pedagogy and instituted at the University of Virginia the first college course of Old English ever taught in America. In several important ways Jefferson accurately predicted the future of Old English studies, and he rightly criticized the Latinate bias of contemporary grammars. Nevertheless, his ignorance of Germanic philology undermined many of his ideas on the grammar and phonology of Old English.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 5 , October 1983, pp. 879 - 898
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Adams, Eleanor N. Old English Scholarship in England from 1566–1800. Yale Studies in English 55. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1917.Google Scholar
Allen, Edward A. “Thomas Jefferson and the Study of English.” Academy (Syracuse) 4 (1889): 1–10.Google Scholar
Arnold, Malcolm Heartwell. “Thomas Jefferson: An American Pioneer in the Study of Old English.” 2 vols. Diss. Univ. of Virginia 1915.Google Scholar
Ashdown, Margaret. “Elizabeth Elstob, the Learned Saxonist.” Modern Language Review 20 (1925): 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. A History of the English Language. 3rd ed. Rev. Thomas Cable. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1978.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. “Thomas Jefferson, Linguistic Liberal.” In Studies for William A. Reed. Ed. Kaffee, Nathaniel E. and Kirby, Thomas A. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press, 1940, 88–108.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. W. “Hickes' ”Thesaurus': A Study in Oxford Book Production.“ English Studies 1 (1948): 28–45.Google Scholar
Berman, Eleanor Davidson. Thomas Jefferson among the Arts. New York: Philosophical Library, 1947.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. Life of Johnson. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Brodie, Fawn M. Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History. New York: Norton, 1974.Google Scholar
Bruce, Philip A. History of the University of Virginia, 1819–1919. 5 vols. New York: Macmillan, 1920–21.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon, 1959.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. Munro. The Study of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Heffer, 1941.Google Scholar
Colbourn, H. Trevor. The Lamp of Experience. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Cometti, Elizabeth. Jefferson's Ideas on a University Library. Charlottesville, Va.: McGregor Library, 1950.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. J., ed. The Old English Version of the Heptateuch, Aelfric's Treatise on the Old and New Testament and His Preface to Genesis. EETS 160. London: Humphrey Milford, 1922.Google Scholar
Croft, Herbert. Letter from Germany to the Princess Royal of England: On the English and German Languages. Hamburg, 1797.Google Scholar
Everett, Edward. Rev. of Proceedings and Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. North American Review 10 (1830): 115–37.Google Scholar
Fisher, John H., and Bornstein, Dianne, eds. In Forme of Speche Is Chaunge: Readings in the History of the English Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Sir John. The Difference between an Absolute and Limited Monarchy; As It More Particularly Regards the English Constitution … Publish'd with Some Remarks by Sir John Fortescue-Aland, Kt. 2nd ed. London, 1719.Google Scholar
Henneman, J. B. “Two Pioneers in the Historical Study of English—Thomas Jefferson and Louis F. Klipstein: A Contribution to the History of the Study of English in America.” Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Modern Language Association. Appendix to PMLA 8 (1893): xliii–xlix.Google Scholar
Hickes, George. Linguarum Vett. Septentrionalium Thesauri Grammatico-Critici et Archaeologici Pars Prima: Seu Institutiones Grammaticae Anglo-Saxonicae et Moeso-Gothicae. Oxford, 1703.Google Scholar
Holthausen, F. Altenglisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1974.Google Scholar
Honeywell, Roy J. The Educational Work of Thomas Jefferson. Harvard Studies in Education 16. 1931; rpt. New York: Russell & Russell, 1964.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Ed. Julian P. Boyd. 20 vols, to date. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Ed. Paul Leicester Ford. 10 vols. New York: Putnam's Sons, 1904–05.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Memorial Edition. Ed. Andrew A. Libscomb and Albert Ellery Bergh. 20 vols. Washington, D.C.: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Assn., 1903.Google Scholar
Keller, Wolfgang. Angelsächsische Paléographie. 2 vols. Palaestra 43.1–2. Berlin: Mayer & Müller, 1906.Google Scholar
Kimball, Marie. Jefferson, the Road to Glory, 1743 to 1776. New York: Coward-McCann, 1943.Google Scholar
Laird, Charlton. “Etymology, Anglo-Saxon, and Noah Webster.” American Speech 21 (1946):3–15.Google Scholar
Leonard, Sterling A. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage, 1700–1800. Madison, Wise: n.p., 1929.Google Scholar
Malone, Dumas. Jefferson and His Time. 6 vols. Boston: Little, 1948–81.Google Scholar
Mencken, H. L. The American Language: Supplement II. New York: Knopf, 1948.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1970.Google Scholar
More, Paul Elmer. “The Paradox of Oxford.” In his Aristocracy and Justice. Shelburne Essays 9. Boston: Houghton, 1915, 69–100.Google Scholar
Murphy, Michael A. “Methods in the Study of Old English in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.” Mediaeval Studies 30 (1968): 345–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Frederick D. Thomas Jefferson's Architectural Drawings. Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society, 1961.Google Scholar
Padover, Saul K., ed. The Complete Jefferson. New York: Tudor, 1943.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. J. The Rise of English Studies. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Peterson, Merrill D. Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Prokosch, E. A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America & Univ. of Pennsylvania, 1939.Google Scholar
Pyles, Thomas. The Origins and Development of the English Language. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, 1971.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, and Wrenn, C. L. An Old English Grammar. New York: Holt, n.d.Google Scholar
Randall, Henry S. The Life of Thomas Jefferson. 3 vols. New York, 1858.Google Scholar
Read, Allen W. “American Projects for an Academy to Regulate Speech.” PMLA 51 (1936): 1141–79.Google Scholar
Sanford, Charles B. Thomas Jefferson and His Library. Hamden, Conn.: Archon, 1977.Google Scholar
Schoeck, Richard J. “Early Anglo-Saxon Studies and Legal Scholarship in the Renaissance.” Studies in the Renaissance 5 (1958): 102–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setzler, E[dwin] B[oinest]. “Thomas Jefferson and the Study of Anglo-Saxon.” Anglo-Saxon (Newberry, S.C.) 1 (1926):1–5.Google Scholar
Setzler, E[dwin] B[oinest], Setzler, Edwin Lake, and Setzler, Hubert Holland. The Jefferson Anglo-Saxon Grammar and Reader. New York: Macmillan, 1938.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Henry E. “Thomas Jefferson as a Philologist.” American Journal of Philology 3 (1882): 211–14.Google Scholar
Sledd, James H., and Kolb, Gwin J. Dr. Johnson's Dictionary: Essays in the Biography of a Book. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Sowerby, E. Millicent. Catalogue of the Library of Thomas Jefferson. 5 vols. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 1952–59.Google Scholar
Sowerby, E. Millicent. “Thomas Jefferson and His Library.” Bibliographical Society of America 50 (1956): 213–28.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. R. “The Study of Anglo-Saxon in America.” English Studies 18 (1936): 241–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Constance E., Berkeley, Francis L., and Casteen, John, eds. The Jefferson Papers of the University of Virginia. Charlottesville: Univ. Press of Virginia, 1973.Google Scholar
Ticknor, George. Life, Letters, and Journals of George Ticknor. Ed. G. S. Hillard. 2 vols. Boston, 1876.Google Scholar
Tuve, Rosamond. “Ancients, Moderns, and Saxons.” ELH 6 (1939): 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“University of Virginia.” Southern Literary Messenger 8 (1842):50–54.Google Scholar
Vorlat, Emma. The Development of English Grammatical Theory, 1586–1737. Leuven, Belg.: Univ. Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Warfel, Harry. Noah Webster. New York: Macmillan, 1936.Google Scholar
Yeager, Robert F. “Some Turning Points in the History of Teaching Old English in America.” Old English Newsletter 13.2 (1980): 9–20.Google Scholar