Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T14:03:29.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vanity Fair through Plate Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Andrew Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Material goods in William Thackeray's work constantly circulate and incessantly dispirit, eliciting and frustrating the desires of characters. While these commodities present themselves as metonyms of enduring fulfillment and utopian pleasure, the images of contentment they provide are repeatedly undermined. This pattern, derived from Thackeray's own economic experience of loss, represents not a private obsession but the effects of the Victorian economy working through Thackeray's biography and his literary products. Vanity Fair, which represents this pattern most fully, derives its narrative energy from its characters' desires, and it suffers, as a result, an analogous disenchantment: the narrative itself, this essay argues, takes the form of the commodities Thackeray describes, and writer and reader experience the text in the way that the characters experience commodities.

Information

Type
Victorian Cluster
Information
PMLA , Volume 105 , Issue 5 , October 1990 , pp. 1042 - 1054
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Adorno, Theodor. “Bach Defended against His Devotees.” Prisms. Trans. Weber, Samuel and Weber, Shirley. Cambridge: MIT P, 1981. 133–46.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. “Letters to Walter Benjamin.” Trans. Harry Zohn. New Left Review 81 (1973): 55–80.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. Minima Moralia. TVans. E.F.N. Jephcott. London: Verso, 1978.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. Philosophy of Modern Music. Trans. Mitchell, Anne and Blomster, Wesley. New York: Seabury, 1973.Google Scholar
Aeschylus, . Agamemnon. Trans. Lattimore, R. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1959.Google Scholar
Bagehot, Walter. “Sterne and Thackeray.” The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Ed. Norman, St. John-Stevas. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1965. 279–311. 15 vols. 1965–86.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. The Accursed Share. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Zone, 1988.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. “The Notion of Expenditure.” Visions of Excess. Trans. Stoekl, Allan. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1985. 116–29.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “The Author as Producer.” Reflections. Trans. Jephcott, Edmund. New York: Schocken, 1986. 220–38.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. On the Origin of German Tragic Drama. Tïans. John Osborne. London: New Left, 1977.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Carey, John. Thackeray: Prodigal Genius. London: Faber, 1977.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1966.Google Scholar
Howes, Craig. “Pendennis and the Controversy on the ‘Dignity of Literature.‘” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 41 (1986): 269–98. Rpt. in William Makepeace Thackeray. Ed. Bloom, Harold. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 233–53.Google Scholar
Hyde, Lewis. The Gift. New York: Random, 1979.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. “The Power of Discourse and the Subordination of the Feminine.” ThisSex Which Is Not One. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 68–85.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. Marxism and Form. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “Pleasure: A Political Issue.” Formations of Pleasure. London: Routledge, 1983. 1–14. Rpt. in Ideologies of Theory. Vol. 2. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1988. 61–74. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Knoepflmacher, U.C.Laughter and Despair. Berkeley: U of California P, 1971.Google Scholar
Kucich, John. Repression in Victorian Fiction. Berkeley: U of California P, 1987.Google Scholar
Levine, George. The Realistic Imagination. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981.Google Scholar
Loofbourow, John. Thackeray and the Form of Fiction. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, Georg. History and Class Consciousness. Trans. Livingstone, Rodney. Cambridge: MIT P, 1968.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital. Trans. Fowkes, Ben. New York: Vintage-Random, 1977.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Ed. Dirk Struik. Trans. Martin Milligan. Karl Marx, Fredrick Engels Collected Works. Vol. 3. London: Lawrence, 1975. 229–346. 43 vols. 1975–88.Google Scholar
Masson, David. “Thackeray and Dickens.” North British . Review 20.29 (1851): 30–47. Rpt. in Thackeray: TheCritical Heritage. Ed. Tillotson, Geoffrey. London: Routledge, 1968. 111–26.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift. Trans. Cunnison, Ian. London: Cohen, 1954.Google Scholar
Mayhew, Henry. London Labour and the London Poor. Vol. 1. New York: Dover, 1968. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Orwell, George “Oysters and Brown Stout.” The Collected Essays of George Orwell. Ed. Orwell, Sonia and Angus, Ian. Vol. 3. New York: Harcourt, 1968. 299–302. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Uneven Developments. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1989.Google Scholar
Ray, Gordon, ed. The Letters and Private Papers of William Makepeace Thackeray. 4 vols. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1945–46.Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard. “Plate Glass.” Raritan 6.4 (1987): 1–15.Google Scholar
Smith, Charles Manby. The Little World of London. London: Hall, 1857.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. “A Brother of the Press on the History of a Literary Man, Laman Blanchard, and the Chances of the Literary Profession.” Thackeray, Complete Works 25: 465–79.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. The Complete Works of William Makepeace Thackeray. 25 vols. New York: Harper, 1904.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. “Diary.” 10–15 Mar. 1848. Ray 2: 358–65.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. Novels by Eminent Hands. Thackeray, Complete Works 12: 467–540.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. Philip. Thackeray, Complete Works. Vols. 20–21.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. Sketches and Travels in London. Thackeray, Complete Works 12: 541–674.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. Vanity Fair. Ed. Sutherland, John. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1983.Google Scholar
“Things Talked of in London.” Chambers's Edinburgh Journal 26 Apr. 1851: 269–71.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Mentor-NAL, 1953.Google Scholar