Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T06:44:12.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Victor Hugo as a Humorist before 1840

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Olin H. Moore*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University Columbus 10

Extract

There has long been rather general agreement, especially among American critics, that Victor Hugo was devoid of a sense of humor. For example, in 1869, J. Burroughs commented in a review of The Man Who Laughs: “Most American readers … will feel the want of humor more than anything else.”1 If a book by Hugo dealing with laughter fell ignominiously below the proud American standard of humor, it is not surprising to find T. S. Perry criticizing such “wild novels” as BugJargal and Han d'Islande for being “without a trace of humor.”2 More modern American critics usually continue in the same vein. Rather typical is the comment of C. H. C. Wright, who declares that “Hugo was quite without a sense of humor.”3 Even Elliott M. Grant, one of the leading contemporary defenders of Hugo, can argue in extenuation of the poet-novelist-dramatist's alleged lack of written humor only that his conversation was sometimes witty.4 In general, critics seem to reason a priori that the supremely egotistic disciple of the melancholy Chateaubriand could not possibly have become a humorist.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable