Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T19:46:31.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

We Want to Know Who Our Students Are

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Patricia Bizzell
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Composition studies concentrates on students, not texts. We in this field want to know who our students are. What abilities to use language do they bring to the academy? What new kinds of intellectual work are they able to do? What challenges does academic discourse pose for them? These are research questions we explore with rigor but also compassion and, sometimes, admiration. My favorite origin story claims that this field's modern iteration sprang from reluctance to use first-year writing courses, required at most universities, simply to eject the “boneheads.” Instead, we learned from Mina Shaughnessy and others to regard even the most struggling undergraduate writers as agents, operating among intersecting and competing discourse communities. For us, student writers are not solitary creators, nor are they intertextual blurs.

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 129 , Issue 3 , May 2014, pp. 442 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

References

Works Cited

Bizzell, Patricia. “Composition Studies Saves the World!” College English 72.2 (2009): 174–87. Rpt. in Profession (2009): 94–98. Print.Google Scholar
Carter, Shannon, and Dent, Kelly L. “East Texas Activism (1966-68): Locating the Literacy Scene through the Digital Humanities.” Enoch and Gold, Digital Humanities 152–70.Google Scholar
Cushman, Ellen. “Wampum, Sequoyan, and Story: Decolonizing the Digital Archive.” Enoch and Gold, Digital Humanities 115–35.Google Scholar
Dickinson Electronic Archives. Marta Werner, Julie Enszer, and Jessica Beard, gen. eds. Dickinson Editing Collective, 2013. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.Google Scholar
Enoch, Jessica, and Gold, David, eds. The Digital Humanities and Historiography in Rhetoric and Composition. Spec. issue of College English 76.2 (2013): 105–93. Print.Google Scholar
Enoch, Jessica, and Gold, David. “Seizing the Methodological Moment: The Digital Humanities and Historiography in Rhetoric and Composition.” Introduction. Enoch and Gold, Digital Humanities 105–14.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Save the World on Your Own Time. New York: Oxford UP, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, Bruce, Lu, Min-Zhan, Royster, Jacqueline Jones, and Trimbur, John. “Language Difference in Writing: Toward a Translingual Approach”. College English 73.3 (2011): 303–21. Print.Google Scholar
Mao, LuMing. “Beyond Bias, Binary, and Border: Mapping Out the Future of Comparative Rhetoric”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43.3 (2013): 209–25. Print.Google Scholar
Remixing Rural Texas: Local Texts, Global Contexts. Ed. Shannon Carter et al. Texas A&M U, Commerce, n.d. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, Mina. Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing. New York: Oxford UP, 1977. Print.Google Scholar