Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T10:11:39.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Voting by Mail Increase Participation? Using Matching to Analyze a Natural Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Thad Kousser and
Megan Mullin
Thad Kousser
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0521. e-mail: tkousser@ucsd.edu
Megan Mullin
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Temple University, 408 Gladfelter Hall (025-22), 1115 West Berks Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122-6089. e-mail: mmullin@temple.edu (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Would holding elections by mail increase voter turnout? Many electoral reform advocates predict that mail ballot elections will boost participation, basing their prediction on the high turnout rate among absentee voters and on the rise in voter turnout after Oregon switched to voting by mail. However, selection problems inherent to studies of absentee voters and Oregon give us important reasons to doubt whether their results would extend to more general applications of voting by mail. In this paper, we isolate the effects of voting in mail ballot elections by taking advantage of a natural experiment in which voters are assigned in a nearly random process to cast their ballots by mail. We use matching methods to ensure that, in our analysis, the demographic characteristics of these voters mirror those of polling-place voters who take part in the same elections. Drawing on data from a large sample of California counties in two general elections, we find that voting by mail does not deliver on the promise of greater participation in general elections. In fact, voters who are assigned to vote by mail turn out at lower rates than those who are sent to a polling place. Analysis of a sample of local special elections, by contrast, indicates that voting by mail can increase turnout in these otherwise low-participation contests.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , Autumn 2007, pp. 428 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

References

Abadie, Alberto, Druckker, David, Herr, Jane Leber, and Imbens, Guido W. 2004. Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. Stata Journal 4: 290–311.Google Scholar
Abadie, Alberto, and Imbens, Guido W. 2006. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74: 235–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H. 1982. The decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review 76: 502–21.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matt, Streb, Matthew, Guerra, Fernando, and Marks, Mara. 2006. Do absentee voters differ from polling place voters? New evidence from California. Public Opinion Quarterly 70: 224–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Burns, Nancy, and Traugott, Michael W. 2001. Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-by-mail systems. Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 178–97.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Bill. 2005. A Better Way to Vote. Washington Post, November 19, B07.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and McNulty, John E. 2004. The costs of voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. Presented at the 2004 annual meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Stanford University, July 29-31.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Patterson, Samuel C. 1982. Contextual influences on participation in U.S. legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 7: 359–81.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Munger, Michael C. 1989. Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 U.S. House elections. American Political Science Review 83: 217–31.Google Scholar
Davidow, Julie. 2002. No Polling Places for Some in S.J. Stockton Record , February 2.Google Scholar
Davis, Susan. 2005. Voting by Mail Could Improve American Democracy. Roll Call, June 22.Google Scholar
Dobuzinskis, Alex. 2004. Mail-Only Elections on the Way. Daily News of Los Angeles, April 22, N3.Google Scholar
Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Kalsow, Gretchen A. 1996a. Comparing absentee and precinct voters: A view over time. Political Behavior 18: 369–92.Google Scholar
Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Kalsow, Gretchen A. 1996b. Comparing absentee and precinct voters: Voting on direct legislation. Political Behavior 18: 393–411.Google Scholar
Elections Task Force, City of San Diego. 2006. Elections task force recommendation: Mail-only ballot election. San Diego, CA: City of San Diego. http://www.sandiego.gov/electionstaskforce/pdf/reports/mail_balloting_report.pdf (accessed June 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P. 2000a. The effect of a nonpartisan get-out-the-vote drive: An experimental study of leafletting. Journal of Politics 62: 846–57.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P. 2000b. The effects of canvassing, direct mail, and telephone contact on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review 94: 653–63.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P. 2001. Do phone calls increase voter turnout? A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 75–85.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Shachar, Ron. 2003. Voting may be habit forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science 47: 540–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S. 2004. Get out the vote! How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Gerber, Alan S., and Nickerson, David W. 2003. Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics 65: 1083–96.Google Scholar
Hanmer, Michael J., and Traugott, Michael W. 2004. The impact of voting by mail on voter behavior. American Politics Research 32: 375–405.Google Scholar
Harris, Rachel. 1999. Voting-by-mail: A look at modernizing the electoral system. CRB Note, Vol. 6, No. 3. Sacramento, CA: California Research Bureau.Google Scholar
Highton, Benjamin. 1997. Easy registration and voter turnout. Journal of Politics 59: 565–75.Google Scholar
Highton, Benjamin, and Wolfinger, Raymond E. 1998. Estimating the effects of the national voter registration act of 1993. Political Behavior 20: 79–104.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A. 2007. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis. 10.1093/pan/mpl013.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido W. 2004. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 4–29.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido W., and Angrist, Joshua D. 1994. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 61: 467–76.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert A. 1993. Voter mobilization in the 1986 midterm election. Journal of Politics 55: 1081–99.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert A. 1996. A reassessment of voter mobilization. Political Research Quarterly 49: 331–49.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A. 2000. Going postal: How all-mail elections influence turnout. Political Behavior 22: 223–39.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A. 2001. Absentee voting, mobilization, and participation. American Politics Research 29: 183–95.Google Scholar
Keith, Tamara. 2002. California report. Kissack, Andrea, senior producer. Morning Edition, February 22. San Francisco, CA: KQED-FM.Google Scholar
Newton, Edmund. 1989. Recall Vote Underscores Weight of Absentee Ballot. Los Angeles Times, June 22, A1.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric. 1996. The effects of eligibility restrictions and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. American Journal of Political Science 40: 498–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 1983. Getting out the vote: Participation in gubernatorial elections. American Political Science Review 77: 675–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 1985. Mailing in the vote: Correlates and consequences of absentee voting. American Journal of Political Science 29: 766–88.Google Scholar
Pool, Bob. 2002. Some Forced to Mail in their Votes. Los Angeles Times, March 1, part 2, 3.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1986. American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review 80: 17–43.Google Scholar
Roberts, Gregory. 2006. Unlikely Allies Fight All-Mail Voting. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 18, B2.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Rubin, Donald B. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70: 41–55.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, Margaret. 1995. All-mail-ballot elections. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Election Administration, Federal Election Commission.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sbranti, J. N. 2003. It's Not Too Late for Ballots: 30,000 Have Sent in Votes So Far in Modesto's Mayor, Council Runoffs. Modesto Bee, December 9: A1.Google Scholar
Southwell, Patricia L., and Burchett, Justin. 1997. Survey of vote-by-mail in the Senate election in the state of Oregon. PS: Political Science and Politics 30: 53–7.Google Scholar
Southwell, Patricia L., and Burchett, Justin. 2000. The effect of all-mail elections on voter turnout. American Politics Quarterly 28: 72–9.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M. 1998. Early voting. Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 57–69.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M., and García-Monet, Patricia A. 1997. Voting early but not often. Social Science Quarterly 78: 657–71.Google Scholar
Suo, Steve. 2000. Some ‘Inactive’ Voters Aren't: A Look at Multnomah County Election Records Finds that Postal Errors Caused Some Active Voters to be Purged from the Rolls. The Oregonian, August 27, C01.Google Scholar
Timpone, Richard J. 1998. Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review 92: 145–58.Google Scholar
Trevilo, Joseph. 2002. One Person, No Polling Place. LA Weekly, March 1, 17.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism and American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wildermuth, John. 2006. Counties Push for Mail-Only Vote. San Francisco Chronicle, January 12, B3.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., Highton, Benjamin, and Mullin, Megan. 2005. How postregistration laws affect the turnout of registrants. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5: 1–23.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J. 1980. Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar