Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T18:53:23.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Fast, Easy, and Efficient Estimator for Multiparty Electoral Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

James Honaker ,
Jonathan N. Katz  and
Gary King
James Honaker
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472. e-mail: tercer@ucla.edu
Jonathan N. Katz
Affiliation:
Division of Humanities and Social Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. e-mail: jkatz@caltech.edu
Gary King
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. e-mail: king@harvard.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Katz and King have previously developed a model for predicting or explaining aggregate electoral results in multiparty democracies. Their model is, in principle, analogous to what least-squares regression provides American political researchers in that two-party system. Katz and King applied their model to three-party elections in England and revealed a variety of new features of incumbency advantage and sources of party support. Although the mathematics of their statistical model covers any number of political parties, it is computationally demanding, and hence slow and numerically imprecise, with more than three parties. In this paper we produce an approximate method that works in practice with many parties without making too many theoretical compromises. Our approach is to treat the problem as one of missing data. This allows us to use a modification of the fast EMis algorithm of King, Honaker, Joseph, and Scheve and to provide easy-to-use software, while retaining the attractive features of the Katz and King model, such as the t distribution and explicit models for uncontested seats.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 84 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aitchison, J. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, E. M. L., and Little, R. J. A. 1975. “Missing Data in Multivariate Analysis.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 37:129–145.Google Scholar
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. 1977. “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm (with Discussion).” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39:1–38.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1994. “A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans.” American Journal of Political Science 38(2): 514–554.Google Scholar
Gibson, John, and Cielecka, Anna. 1995. “Economic Influences on the Political Support for Market Reform in Post-communist Transitions: Some Evidence from the 1993 Polish Parliamentary Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies 47(5): 765–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honaker, James, Joseph, Gary King, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2000. Amelia: A Program for Missing Data (Gauss Version). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu.Google Scholar
Katz, Jonathan, and King, Gary. 1999. “A Statistical Model for Multiparty Electoral Data.” American Political Science Review 93(1): 15–32.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, Anne Joseph, James, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 49–69.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analysis: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44:341–355.Google Scholar
Little, Roderick J.A., and Rubin, Donald. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Liu, Chuanhai. 1994. Statistical Analysis Using the Multivariatet Distribution . Dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Liu, Chuanhai, and Rubin, Donald. 1994. “A Simple Extension to EM and ECM with Faster Monotone Convergence.” Biometrika 81:633–648.Google Scholar
Schafer, Joseph L. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Honaker et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Honaker et al. supplementary material(File)
File 394.9 KB