Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:24:56.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimization of a dried residue specimen preparation method for quantifying analytes in plutonium metal using WDXRF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2012

Christopher G. Worley and
Lisa P. Colletti
Christopher G. Worley
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Lisa P. Colletti
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Get access

Abstract

A novel method for preparing thin films was investigated for quantifying gallium and iron in plutonium solutions using WDXRF. This technique was developed to eliminate the potential for radioactive liquid to leak into the spectrometer, decrease specimen preparation time, and minimize waste. Samples were cast in μL quantities onto Kapton, and a surfactant was added to disperse the solution uniformly across the Kapton. After drying the specimens, they were sealed in a cell for analysis. Results to date indicate the method can provide a relative precision of ∼0.5% for gallium and ∼2% for iron, which is more than sufficient for routine sample analyses.

Keywords

WDXRFplutoniumdried residuethin film

Information

Type
X-Ray Fluorescence
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2007, pp. 152 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Colletti, L. P. and Havrilla, G. J. (1999). “Development of the dried spot specimen preparation methodology and application to MXRF analysis,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 41, 291–300.Google Scholar
Martell, C. J. and Hansel, J. M. (1988). Determining Gallium from Plutonium Using Anion Exchange and X-Ray Fluorescence, Report LA-11435 (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, C. and King, B.-S. (1991). “Trace element analysis of solutions at the PPB level,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 34, 41–55.Google Scholar
Murata, M., Omatsu, M., and Mushimoto, S. (1984). “Solvent extraction-microdroplet X-ray fluorescence analyses of trace amounts of heavy metal ions,” X-Ray Spectrom.XRSPAX10.1002/xrs.1300130209 13, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, A. J., Turner, D. C., Wilson, A., Wherry, D. C., and Wong, R. (1997). “An order of magnitude improvement in detection limits achieved by using a new sample support in small spot XRF analysis,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 39, 799–804.Google Scholar
Worley, C. G. (2002). “Quantification of gallium in dried residue samples by XRF: an improved sample preparation method for analyzing plutonium metal,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 45, 421–426.Google Scholar
Worley, C. G. (2003). “Accurate quantification of radioactive materials by X-ray fluorescence: gallium in plutonium metal,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 46, 369–374.Google Scholar
Worley, C. G. and Colletti, L. P. (2004). “Improvements in XRF specimen preparation using the dried residue method: gallium in plutonium metal,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 47, 98–103.Google Scholar
Worley, C. G. and Havrilla, G. J. (2001). “Accurate quantification of dried residue thin films using X-ray fluorescence,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 44, 392–397.Google Scholar