No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Impact of Facility Damages on Hospital Capacities for Decision Support in Disaster Response Planning for an Earthquake
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 June 2012
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Hospitals provide life-saving functions and emergency assistance to communities when disaster strikes. Any damage to hospitals from a disaster, either structural and non-structural, can impair these capabilities. In addition, an inaccurate estimation of the treatment capacities available at hospitals in a disaster-affected region can severely affect the success of emergency relief plans. In this paper, the impact of facility damage on hospital operations is estimated using a generic simulation model. From the simulation results, parametric models are developed for estimating hospitals' capacities and patient waiting times that could be used by emergency response teams in making casualty dispatching/routing decisions.
Information
- Type
- Original Research
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2009
References
1Gendzwill, D: Glossary of Seismic Techniques and Terminology. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
2Boer, Jde, Brismar, B, Eldar, R, Rutherford, WH: The medical severity index of disasters. J Emerg Med 1989;7(3):269–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Kanter, RR, Moran, JR: Hospital emergency surge capacity: An empiric New York statewide study. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50(3):314–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Ballard, SM, Kuhl, ME: The Use of Simulation to Determine Maximum Capacity in the Surgical Suite Operating Room. Winter Simulation Conference, Monterey, CA, 2006;433–438 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Yi, P, George, SK, Paul, JA, Lin, L: Hospital Capacity Planning for Emergency Management in Disaster Mitigation. Socio-Economic Sciences 2009, (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Paul, JA, George, SK, Yi, P, Lin, L: Transient modeling in simulation of hospital operations for emergency response. Prehosp Disaster Med 2006;21(3):223–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Paul, JA, Hariharan, G: Hospital capacity planning for efficient disaster mitigation during a bioterrorist attack. Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, 2007, pp 1139–1147.Google Scholar
8PAHO: Principles of Disaster Mitigation in Health Facilities. Disaster Mitigation Series. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, Regional Office of the World Health Organization.Google Scholar
9Tong, M, Lee, G, Rzhevsky, V, Qi, J, Shinozuka, M: A Comparision of seismic risk of non-structural systems in a hospital before and after a major structural retrofit. ATC-29-2 seminar on seismic design, retrofit, and performance of nonstructural components in critical facilities, Newport Beach, CA, 23–24 October 2003.Google Scholar
10Shinozuka, M, Cheng, TC, Jin, X, Dong, X, Penn, D: System performance analysis of power networks, Seventh US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (7NCEE), Boston, Massachusetts, July 2002:21–25.Google Scholar
11Soong, TT, Garcia, DL: Seismic vulnerability and protection of nonstructural components. Applied Technology Council-29, 2, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. Proceedings of Seminar on Seismic Design, Performance, and Retrofit of Nonstructural Components in Critical Facilities Newport Beach, CA, 23–24 October.Google Scholar
12Gibson, G: An introduction to seismology. Information Management & Computer Security 1996;4:20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Bath, M: Lateral inhomogeneities in the upper mantle. Tectonophysics 1965; 2(6):483–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Kircher, CA, McCann, MW: 1983. Development of fragility curves for estimation of earthquake-induced damage. Proceedings of Conference XXIII: A Workshop on Continuing Actions to Reduce Potential Losses from Future Earthquakes in Arkansas and Nearby States. Open-File Report 81–437. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey (USGS).Google Scholar
15Park, YJ, Ang, AH, Wen, YK: Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete building. Journal of Structural Engineering 1985;111:740–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Grigoriu, M, Kafali, C: Fragility analysis for nonstructural systems in critical facilities, Proceedings: ATC-29-2 eminar on Seismic Design, Performance, and Retrofit of Nonstructural, Components in Critical Facilities, Newport Beach, CA, 23–24 October 2003.Google Scholar
17Shinozuka, M, Cheng, TC, Maria, Q, Feng, Mau ST: Seismic performance analysis of electric power systems. Proceedings of the Eighth US–Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures Against Soil Liquefaction.Google Scholar
18Jacobson, A: Fragility Analysis of a water supply system. Seismic Design and Analysis of Lifeline Systems, Student accomplishments, MCEER, 2002-2003.Google Scholar
19Chang, SE, Chamberlin, C: Assessing the role of lifeline systems in community disaster resilience. Earthquake Spectra 2004;20:739–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Gallagher, RP, Reasenberg, PA, Poland, CD: Earthquake aftershocks–Entering damaged buildings. ATC TechBrief 2, Applied Technology Council, 1999.Google Scholar
21Yeo, GL, Cornell, CA: Building tagging criteria based on aftershock PSHA. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004.Google Scholar
22FEMA: Hazards US Multi Hazard (HAZUS-MH). Available at http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/hz_overview.shtm. Accessed August 2005.Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 10
- Cited by