Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T22:34:12.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The First Steps Towards Innovation: A Reference Process for Developing Product Profiles

Part of:Design Methods and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Miriam Wilmsen,
Katharina Dühr,
Jonas Heimicke and
Albert Albers

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Successful companies spend many of their resources in the initiation and realisation of innovation projects, which might be successful at the market. Especially in the early phase of these projects, there is a high degree of uncertainty and therefore, product profiles established themselves as methodological support for product developers. However, it is not possible to give developers a straight and always equal process to follow for developing these product profiles. Based on this problem, this contribution investigates context-independent process steps to develop promising product profiles. Thus, this work provides a possible reference process to develop product profiles to support product developers in the early stage of innovation projects. Therefore, 631 process steps of 16 innovation projects were analysed and 100 process steps were derived from literature. Based on an expert workshop, 48 of these process steps were identified as relevant to consider in a context-independent reference process model. In a further empirical Live-Lab study, process patterns were investigated and the usability and relevance of the process steps were evaluated as positive.

Keywords

Design processInnovationProcess modellingProduct ProfileEarly design phases

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019, pp. 1673 - 1682
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Albers, A. (2010), “Five Hypotheses about Engineering Processes and their Consequences”, Proceedings of the TMCE 2010.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N., Heimicke, J., Walter, B. and Reiß, N. (2017), “20 years of co-creation using case based learning. An integrated approach for teaching innovation and research in Product Generation Engineering”, in Auer, M.E., Guralnick, D. and Uhomoibhi, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th ICL Conference, Springer, pp. 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73204-6_69Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N. and Rapp, S. (2016a), “PGE - Product Generation Engineering - Case Study of Dual Mass Flywheel”, in Marjanović, D., Štorga, M., Pavković, N., Bojčetić, N. and Škec, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference, pp. 791–800.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Walter, B., Basedow, G.N., Reiß, N., Heitger, N., Ott, S. and Bursac, N. (2018), “Product Profiles. Modelling customer benefits as a foundation to bring inventions to innovations”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.044Google Scholar
Albers, A., Reiss, N., Bursac, N. and Richter, T. (2016b), “iPeM – Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.168Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a design research methodology, Springer, Dordrecht, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1_2Google Scholar
Boehm, B. and Turner, R. (2003), “Using risk to balance agile and plan- driven methods”, Computer, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2003.1204376Google Scholar
Chong, Y.T. and Chen, C.-H. (2010), “Customer needs as moving targets of product development: a review”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 48 No. 1-4, pp. 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2282-6Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1987), “Success factors in product innovation”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 215–223.Google Scholar
Dörner, D. (1979), “Problemlösen als Informationsverarbeitung”, Kohlhammer-Standards Psychologie Studientext, 2. Aufl., Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gassmann, O. and Bader, M.A. (2017), Patentmanagement: Innovationen erfolgreich nutzen und schützen, 4th ed., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Ge, X. and Leifer, L. (2017), “Design Thinking at the Core: Learn New Ways of Thinking and Doing by Reframing”, in Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference -- 2017, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, Sunday 6 August 2017, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2017-67172Google Scholar
Heimicke, J., Reiss, N., Albers, A., Walter, B., Breitschuh, J., Knoche, S. and Bursac, N. (2018), “Agile Innovative Impulses in the Product Generation Engineering. Creativity by Intentional Forgetting”, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2018), No. 8, p. 183–190.Google Scholar
Lawson, B. and Samson, D. (2001), “Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach”, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 05 No. 03, pp. 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919601000427Google Scholar
Münch, J., Fagerholm, F., Johnson, P., Pirttilahti, J., Torkkel, J. and Jäarvinen, J. (2013), “Creating Minimum Viable Products in Industry-Academia Collaborations”, in Mylopoulos, J., Rosemann, M., Valerdi, R. and Morgan, L. (Eds.), Lean Enterprise Software and Systems: 4th International Conference, LESS 2013, Galway, Ireland, December 1-4, 2013, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 167, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44930-7_9Google Scholar
Ropohl, G. (1975), Einführung in die Systemtechnik.: Systemtechnik—Grundlagen und Anwendungen, Carl Hanser Verlag, München.Google Scholar
Schäfer, M. and Keppler, D. (2013), “Modelle der technikorientierten Akzeptanzforschung Überblick und Reflexion am Beispiel eines Forschungsprojekts zur Implementierung innovativer technischer Energieeffizienz-Maßnahmen”.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S. and Paetzold, K. (2016), “Agilität als Alternative zu traditionellen Standards in der Entwicklung physischer Produkte: Chancen und Herausforderungen”, DFX 2016: Proceedings of the 27th Symposium Design for X, pp. 255–267.Google Scholar
Schwaber, K. and Sutherland, J. (2017), The Scrum Guide.Google Scholar
Smith, R.P. and Morrow, J.A. (1999), “Product development process modeling”, Design Studies, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 237–261.Google Scholar
Thomke, S. and Reinertsen, D. (1998), “Agile Product Development: Managing Development Flexibility in Uncertain Environments”, California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165973Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2018), “Process models in design and development”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 161–202.Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C. and Eckert, C.M. (2017), “Perspectives on iteration in design and development”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0226-3Google Scholar