Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:25:27.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychopathology and Boolean Factor Analysis: a mismatch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Hans O. F. Veiel
Hans O. F. Veiel*
Affiliation:
Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Mannheim, West Germany
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr H. O. F. Veiel, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit 6800 Mannheim 1, J5, Postfach 5970, West Germany.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

It has recently been claimed that Boolean Factor Analysis (BFA) is superior to more traditional approaches to empirical syndrome identification in psychopathology (Weber & Scharfetter, 1984). This paper examines the underlying assumptions and the empirical basis of this claim. A hypothetical data set, with a more complex structure than the examples used by Weber & Scharfetter to support their claim, is analysed by means of both BFA and Ordinary Factor Analysis (OFA). It is shown that, as data sets resemble empirical conditions more closely, BFA may break down completely while OFA continues to yield adequate results.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , August 1985, pp. 623 - 628
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–III). APA: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E. & Erbaugh, J. K. (1962). Reliability of psychiatric diagnosis: 2. A study of consistency in clinical judgements and ratings. American Journal of Psychiatry 119, 351–357.Google Scholar
Cantor, N., Smith, E. E., French, R. D. & Mezzich, J. (1980). Psychiatric diagnosis as prototype categorization. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 89, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, W. J., Brown, M. B., Engelman, L., Frane, J. W., Hill, M. A., Jennrich, R. I. & Toporek, J. D.(1981). BMDP Statistical Software. University of California Press: Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hibbert, G. A., Teasdale, J. D. & Spencer, P. (1984). Covariation of depressive symptoms over time. Psychological Medicine 14, 451–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. C., Fleiss, J. L., Endicott, J. & Cohen, J. (1967). Mental Status Schedule: proportion of factor-analytically derived scales. Archives of General Psychiatry 16, 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A. C. & Scharfetter, C. (1984). The syndrome concept: history and statistical operationalizations. Psychological Medicine 14, 315–325.Google Scholar